http://www.ebikehub.com/forum/viewtopic ... 4661#p4658


Thud wrote:thats no way to talk about my alter ego Dogman![]()
look at my next build:
If a chicken & a 1/2 can lay an egg & a 1/2 in a day & a 1/2........
I am going to go for 3k posts just in this thread! (dare me?)



Miles wrote:Piercing analysis: http://www.ebikehub.com/forum/viewtopic ... 4662#p4662




nicobie wrote:Miles wrote:Piercing analysis: http://www.ebikehub.com/forum/viewtopic ... 4662#p4662
The guy really is a dillweed isn't he.![]()


TPA wrote:That's like 5 pages of only one dude yammering



TPA wrote:That's like 5 pages of only one dude yammering

veloman wrote: but what I have read leads me to believe he has more knowledge than most when it comes to ebikes.


AussieJester wrote:veloman wrote: but what I have read leads me to believe he has more knowledge than most when it comes to ebikes.
While this maybe true, Safe repeatadly prooved he couldnt
accept he was wrong and/OR follow the already very very lax rules of a forum. He was quite skilled with his hands used minimal tools and built some decent e-bikes, e-bikes several eyars ago people mocked, fast forward and we have a small group trying to build e-race bikes....albeit with a tad more power than SiR Safes EBRR 1000watt 'input' or is that 'output' i forget either way, his 1000watt carry-on would be as much fun as a poke in the eye with a stick, i use ~double the power just getting out my driveway LoL...
KiM


veloman wrote:I think his limited-power angle is good. It's good because it's important to strive for efficiency in some cases. There is value in not needing 2kw+, and still getting around quickly for a bike. Less cost, weight, smaller motor, again less weight, able to ride a lighter bike, much easier to mount less battery, it retains more of a bike feel, vastly better range. I myself have been upping the power and enjoying it, but I am not going to say "<1000watts" is useless and a waste of time.


Ypedal wrote:dude.. can i quote that reply in the future ? lol... +1 and perfectly worded sir.

liveforphysics wrote:veloman wrote:I think his limited-power angle is good. It's good because it's important to strive for efficiency in some cases. There is value in not needing 2kw+, and still getting around quickly for a bike. Less cost, weight, smaller motor, again less weight, able to ride a lighter bike, much easier to mount less battery, it retains more of a bike feel, vastly better range. I myself have been upping the power and enjoying it, but I am not going to say "<1000watts" is useless and a waste of time.
The reason he was banned has NOTHING to do with wanting sub 1kw bikes. That's a personal choice thing, and more power to him if he wants to preach sub 1kw bikes.
The problem was, he could go to elaborate lengths on a near-daily basis to try to spread incorrect information about how motors worked, controllers worked, aero, gearing, motor winds, etc.
It took a team of guys here working for quite a bit of time everyday just to constantly refute the absurdly wrong things he would post continuously, badly confusing newbs who need correct information more than anyone to have a good start in ebikes.
After YEARS of folks trying to set him straight on basic concepts of how a motor works, how gearing works etc, he STILL was trying to preach 100% wrong BS everywhere on the forum he could everyday.
This is why he was banned. Totally not related to wanting sub 1kw ebikes.






oatnet wrote:
Wow, I didn't realize we had over 10,000 members now. Explosive growth!
-JD
