Ever since moving to Seattle, I find it's much too large and far too labyrinthine to spontaneously find "bicycle friendly" streets(And, this city is crowded with cars on 'main ways', of which there are many everywhere) so I needed something to navigate. What do you guys do to navigate?
I just recently purchased a $260 netbook(A miniature laptop with a 9 inch screen, weighs around 2.3 pounds and has a 5 hour battery life. Sports a 1.6 ghz processor and 1 GB memory, so good enough for everyday XP tasks.) and added a touch screen so that it's now truly ultra portable as it can be easily used standing up. Needing a map of this entire city and thinking how accurate google maps is, I went to investigate: Apparently, using google maps as outlined at http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1073912/g ... arge_maps/, you can save extremely huge google maps to whatever size you need. It seems google maps usually displays 640 by 480 or less maps which can be less than exciting for a map for the whole city, but upping the resolution to street-level so I can actually read street names(and it's the hybrid satellite/road form so I can see actual buildings and parking lots, too!) and increasing the map size to 8,000x20,000 did the trick! Of course, it seems the map took forever to load(It took about 40 minutes) and I had memory issues as it consumed around 2 gb in memory on my 1 gb RAM machine, but I eventually got it to work(Despite the 2 gb in memory consumption, the actual data is only 100 mb in size). So, I know how a portable map of the entire Seattle area with satellite imagery and road names, and I can easily access it wherever with my ultra portable netbook. Now, I can navigate around Seattle without taking rather risky routes. I just need an umbrella that I don't have to carry with my hands to use it anywhere, any time in Seattle(It rains often enough).
(Now I need to manipulate the data on a more powerful computer at school so that I can chop it down to a more CPU and memory friendly form.)
One problem I seem to be having is that FireFox's ScreenDrag doesn't seem to particularly like 8000x20,000 images as it seems to freeze when requested to save the page so it's currently in offline html form, which doesn't appear to be so kind on the memory(I think it heavily uses algorithms to recreate the image, which consumes a bit of memory for larger maps).
I just recently purchased a $260 netbook(A miniature laptop with a 9 inch screen, weighs around 2.3 pounds and has a 5 hour battery life. Sports a 1.6 ghz processor and 1 GB memory, so good enough for everyday XP tasks.) and added a touch screen so that it's now truly ultra portable as it can be easily used standing up. Needing a map of this entire city and thinking how accurate google maps is, I went to investigate: Apparently, using google maps as outlined at http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1073912/g ... arge_maps/, you can save extremely huge google maps to whatever size you need. It seems google maps usually displays 640 by 480 or less maps which can be less than exciting for a map for the whole city, but upping the resolution to street-level so I can actually read street names(and it's the hybrid satellite/road form so I can see actual buildings and parking lots, too!) and increasing the map size to 8,000x20,000 did the trick! Of course, it seems the map took forever to load(It took about 40 minutes) and I had memory issues as it consumed around 2 gb in memory on my 1 gb RAM machine, but I eventually got it to work(Despite the 2 gb in memory consumption, the actual data is only 100 mb in size). So, I know how a portable map of the entire Seattle area with satellite imagery and road names, and I can easily access it wherever with my ultra portable netbook. Now, I can navigate around Seattle without taking rather risky routes. I just need an umbrella that I don't have to carry with my hands to use it anywhere, any time in Seattle(It rains often enough).
(Now I need to manipulate the data on a more powerful computer at school so that I can chop it down to a more CPU and memory friendly form.)
One problem I seem to be having is that FireFox's ScreenDrag doesn't seem to particularly like 8000x20,000 images as it seems to freeze when requested to save the page so it's currently in offline html form, which doesn't appear to be so kind on the memory(I think it heavily uses algorithms to recreate the image, which consumes a bit of memory for larger maps).