
JRP3 wrote:deVries wrote:
Sutho, I hope that guarantee would *not* require you to return the bad module, because it would be a "worthless" guarantee if you had to do that. It seems just a digital picture showing the lower "defective voltage" of the pack voltage emailed to them should be sufficient to get a free module replacement (+shipping).
No way, too easy to fake, and the "bad" module still has valuable components, as you know. Basically everyone better be ready to keep whatever they get.
oatnet wrote:Three 7s3p modules in a box weighed 102lbs.
HumboldtRC wrote:The modules dimensions are 6.5" wide x 9" long x 9.5" tall
I don't own a scale, besides my little one I got from HK, so no weight. The shipping crate said 31kg and I think the cream weighs ~4 pounds, so the modules could weight 14.5kg...?? I'll take them to the a shipping store tomorrow and weigh them.

deVries wrote:JRP3 wrote:deVries wrote:
Sutho, I hope that guarantee would *not* require you to return the bad module, because it would be a "worthless" guarantee if you had to do that. It seems just a digital picture showing the lower "defective voltage" of the pack voltage emailed to them should be sufficient to get a free module replacement (+shipping).
No way, too easy to fake, and the "bad" module still has valuable components, as you know. Basically everyone better be ready to keep whatever they get.
I have to disagree.
Seriously, how many DIY guys here buying these modules are going to lie, cheat, fake, steal about receiving a defective module!Zero! IMO. We are not thieves. We just want exactly what we were told we were getting... no more no less. That's a perfectly reasonable expectation and a standard that everyone can & should stand by... on both sides of this equation, meaning, seller & buyer.
Yes, we have to keep what is defective, since it would be unreasonable to return it.![]()



JRP3 wrote:Yes, you'll get to keep it, and you won't get a refund. The seller has already stated as much.
JRP3 wrote:I'm equally sure that the seller in China is not going to count on that honesty and start sending free replacement packs on the basis of a picture of a voltmeter.

deVries wrote:Who's side are you on?Anyway, you are not the seller, so it's not for you to push the issue or agenda on their behalf. IMO.


Pure wrote:Also, if you bring up the issue of their packing, you need to tread lightly. This vendor has already threatened to not sell to us over seas customers. If packing them becomes too problematic, they may just say no more sales. Trust me when I say they really don't need our business. There is more than enough of a market in china for these things. They really don't "need" to sell them out of country.




999zip999 wrote:Dr.Bass and Steveo how do you name on the top of this thread ?
zzoing wrote:victpower is a serious sounding company but the battery i bought from them in 2k9 was technically abit low quality, the cells were not so durable and it went tits up on me when i charged it in 3 4 degrees temperature on a 2.5 amp charger so i think they need some serious considering to review their products first. i had posted to ask about the low temp charging and no one answered at the time, and the victpower leaflet didnt say either... but they were known to be dodgy cells when i posted the image on here afterwards.
njloof wrote:If anyone's interested, I just received my 7s3p pack; it seems normal and tests OK on the voltmeter but I think overall it's more of a R&D effort than I'm up for to build a full size car pack. If you're in the US and want to buy it from me I'm happy to send pics; I promise to ship in a much bigger box filled with lots of packing material

deVries wrote:zaxxon wrote:If ordering the 28s3p, then I definitely suggest *insisting* that much more foam protection is used. These modules are expensive & there is no reason -or- "excuse" they should not package these much more carefully with foam padding all sides AND also covering the total entire module surface area too, imo.![]()
Zaxxon, where were your three 28s3p modules shipped to?


TheWizard wrote:A123 is also a big player in grid storage, I wonder if these packs may be swap-er-oos for a power company customer.

Ratking wrote:Pure wrote:Also, if you bring up the issue of their packing, you need to tread lightly. This vendor has already threatened to not sell to us over seas customers. If packing them becomes too problematic, they may just say no more sales. Trust me when I say they really don't need our business. There is more than enough of a market in china for these things. They really don't "need" to sell them out of country.
I would like to know more about your inside information. How do you know shit about how the Chinese marked is?
I would say close to the opposite, but thats just my subjective opinion just as yours as long as you don't give us some proof.
It's like you want to feed the seller with arguments.
In China, electric bicycles are leaving cars in the dust. Last year, Chinese bought 21 million e-bikes, compared with 9.4 million autos. While China now has about 25 million cars on the road, it has four times as many e-bikes.
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/ ... z1trJRXzfA

TheWizard wrote:I ordered 3 7s3p's and just got them today. took about 5 days from Shenzen to Phoenix. the delivery man missed me at my house, so I went to the airport depot and picked em up myself.

deVries wrote:Can you weigh your modules to give us the individual weight(s) & any variances or differences too, please.


oatnet wrote:I took my packs apart today.

SlyCayer wrote:deVries wrote:Can you weigh your modules to give us the individual weight(s) & any variances or differences too, please.
Is it me or it's hard to get the weight of the modules? I promise that if we do not have a weight by the time I get mine, I will provide a very accurate weight.

oatnet wrote:30.6 lbs minus 14 screws, and when I removed the BMS/front cover it dropped to 30lbs even, so maybe 8lbs of packaging/wiring/buss bars on top of the weight of the cells. The 28s (I am tired of adding "3p" to "7s" and "28s") is heavier than I want to lift at the moment.
oatnet wrote:...2 modules were at 22.x v and the third at 19.x v, so I assume it has a bad 3p cell.


oatnet wrote:Just for you, deVries and SlyCayer. 30.6 lbs

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], migueralliart, Popstar, Racenut286 and 11 guests