



bane77087 wrote:Dillholes... I mean really if they would just sell those damm 20AH pouches to the public they would be having to hire ppl, not be laying them off. They would rather lay people off than to sell to the public that wants to buy.




flathill wrote:. It seems the gov is realizing the free market is bs and if you want to compete with Asia you have to have collusion



nicobie wrote:flathill wrote:. It seems the gov is realizing the free market is bs and if you want to compete with Asia you have to have collusion
Sad but true

‘A123 VP Jason Forcier said in an interview with Forbes that the contract is a “major win” for the company. A123 will be providing the full battery system for the Spark, including not just the battery but also associated enclosures, electronics and cooling. The Spark goes into production in 2013; Forcier says the deal should be providing substantial revenue to A123 by 2014. He notes that the company will start producing the batteries for the Spark in its existing facility in Livonia, Michigan, which it also produces batteries for Fisker and Navistar vehicles, but will consider adding more capacity at a second site A123 owns five miles down the road in Romulus, Michigan’.

liveforphysics wrote:nicobie wrote:flathill wrote:. It seems the gov is realizing the free market is bs and if you want to compete with Asia you have to have collusion
Sad but true
You simply need less government interference to compete with Asia.
The US is massively absurdly subsidized in its industry. From food to energy, its the tax payers here that carry a burden to ensure the best working option doesn't happen only what gets subsided happens.
Asia has steel subsidies. We piss and moan about that somehow making an unfair advantage. Seems like a hell of a lot smarter option than our subsidies of corn to the point it sells for below the cost of production, and absurd oil enscentives to ensure alternative energies stay in too low of economies of scale to be naturally competitive.




Jason27 wrote:There will never be free trade until china stops manipulating its currency...





Jason27 wrote:
The Obama admin refuses to label china a currency manipulator. I wonder why?

liveforphysics wrote:http://www.google.com/finance?source=an ... CCMQ5QYwAA



Ricky_nz wrote:bane77087 wrote:Dillholes... I mean really if they would just sell those damm 20AH pouches to the public they would be having to hire ppl, not be laying them off. They would rather lay people off than to sell to the public that wants to buy.
I doubt selling to individuals would reach the required quantities to keep that many people employed.
On the plus side if they sold to individuals they would probably have to hire a huge number of lawyers.
I do however wish that we could buy the cells.


Me Babbbling wrote:The devaluation of the U.S dollar is related to the "monetary easing." So, yeah, in that sense we manipulate currency by printing more currency. But it also has to do with the fact that markets are less crazed. It was overvalued as was (?still is? I dont pay attention) gold because people relatively trust gold.
I guess a direct comparison is funky is all that I'm saying. China's currency is manipulated in so far as exports:imports are kept high, and they limit outside currency transfers (e.g, me buying 50 million yuan/) For what its worth, they did recently let to go up in part to combat inflation and/or bolster. It's just a number of variables, I'm saying. People argue that U.S is more hands-off, just primarily affecting interest rates, while complaining china's method is very hands-on. Economics are absurd :p, though.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests