Building the greenest office building ever

Kingfish

100 MW
Joined
Feb 3, 2010
Messages
4,064
Location
Redmond, WA-USA, Earth, Sol, Orion–Cygnus Arm, Mil
MSNBC today - Could this $30 million green tower be the future of world cities?

This is a project in the works going up in north Seattle.

The Bullitt Center, as the building will be known, is designed to use just a third of the energy consumed by a typical office building its size. It also aims to minimize its resource footprint by generating electricity from solar power, collecting water from rainfall and treating all sewage and wastewater onsite. It also will have no parking for cars -- just racks for bikes.

...

  • Solar panels on the roof that extend over the sides of the building will provide the electricity. (Panels have gained enough efficiency in recent years to make them operable even in places with as much cloud cover as Seattle.)
  • 26 geothermal wells, each 400 feet deep, will pump underground air that's a constant 55 degrees into the building to help offset heating costs in winter.
  • Rainwater will be collected in a 56,000 gallon basement cistern. Purification steps include a special membrane for the roof, ultrafiltration and ultraviolet light. Because the process has to be tested before Seattle will consider authorizing it for drinking water, sinks and showers, Hayes calls it "the last big hurdle" for the center.
  • Sewage will be sent to 10 basement composters and then shipped offsite to become fertilizer.
...

In Wallingford, a neighborhood of homes and low-rise commercial buildings in Seattle, a green developer inspired by the Bullitt project says it needs to exceed the city's height limit in order to make its building cost effective.

That has angered neighbors like <redacted>, herself an environmental activist, and put the project on hold as city government deals with the opposition.

Interesting conception. Seems like someone always wants to spoil the party...
~KF
 
Builders ALWAYS want to break the limits on height, setbacks, etc. etc.. in order to make it 'pencil out'. The other way to describe that is that they want maximum profit for their investment in the building, and since the property is a fixed cost, the more square footage you can build, the more money you make. The justifications are just cover for trying to maximize how much they make... push for everything with the threat that you won't build, thus not filling the government coffers with tax dollars later on, and eventually settle on what you can get away with. It doesn't matter what the regulations are at the start, it's what you can get away with. Even the LEEDs regulations have been turned into mostly bullshit as major developers added stuff in to make their buildings sound greener... things like points for a room somewhere in the building designated as bike storage... even if bikes aren't allowed in the building.
 
redorblack said:
The justifications are just cover for trying to maximize how much they make... push for everything with the threat that you won't build, thus not filling the government coffers with tax dollars later on, and eventually settle on what you can get away with. It doesn't matter what the regulations are at the start, it's what you can get away with.

Yep, that's life in any incorporated place. The only guarantee is the political process. Choose your community wisely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Place_(United_States_Census_Bureau)#Incorporated_place
 
Back
Top