New High capacity Li-Ion high cycle count

Batteries, Chargers, and Battery Management Systems.

New High capacity Li-Ion high cycle count

Postby microbrain » Mon May 21, 2012 4:15 am

Hi everyone, i'm mostly a reader around here, i've made some projects of my own, and now that i have more free time, i will try be more active and helpfull for this great forum.
I'm 31, from portugal, experienced in AVR's c and Computer software development. corently own a E-bike with a golden motor in it.


The reason for this post is this news i saw today ....

http://www.ntsworks.com/New_Battery.html

Hope this isnt a hoax.

:)
microbrain
1 µW
1 µW
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:42 am

mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby Paul_G » Mon May 21, 2012 11:30 am

mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

http://green.autoblog.com/2012/05/18/ne ... e-costs-l/
Paul_G
1 kW
1 kW
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:42 am
Location: Bronx, NY

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby Jeremy Harris » Mon May 21, 2012 12:15 pm

Also posted here, with a link to their website (which doesn't say much, unfortunately): viewtopic.php?f=14&t=39980
Please ask questions on the forum, rather than by PM, as it helps others and you'll get a better range of answers.
User avatar
Jeremy Harris
10 GW
10 GW
 
Posts: 4635
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Salisbury, UK

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby flathill » Mon May 21, 2012 1:46 pm

just need to gold plate the battery terminals and we should be all good
Neal mentions he needs investors and want to sell to DIYers but can't get around the liability issue
should just sell it kit form
flathill
10 kW
10 kW
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby Joe Perez » Mon May 21, 2012 3:47 pm

NTS Works wrote:The problem has been that cylindrical cells are hard to electrically connect together. The traditional way to interconnect them is with welded nickel strips. The drawback to this is that the electrical resistance is high, the welds break easily and welding together thousands of cells is very cumbersome.


So, spot-welded connections have a higher electrical resistance than two pieces of metal simply pressed against one another?

The ability to just pop cells in and out of a pack as though you were replacing the cells in your personal massage wand is certainly appealing, but when claims like the above are used as justification for any new technique or technology, it certainly makes me wonder about the underlying ethics and mindset of the company.
The concept of "average" requires that 50% of the population be below it.
User avatar
Joe Perez
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Sunny San Diego, CA

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby John in CR » Mon May 21, 2012 4:33 pm

flathill wrote:just need to gold plate the battery terminals and we should be all good
Neal mentions he needs investors and want to sell to DIYers but can't get around the liability issue
should just sell it kit form


I just want the 30ah 4s modules already in production and soon to be coming out of a US factory....good for thousands of cycles, safer than lifepo4, 160wh/kg, self balancing, and capable of 125A continuous. The only thing a pack of 18650's could have on them is more latitude in pack shape. I'm sworn to secrecy for now, but don't spend too much on batteries at this time. There's finally light at the end of the tunnel unless you need extreme power density.

John
John in CR
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 10387
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 12:58 am
Location: Paradise

Re: New High capacity Li-Ion high cycle count

Postby CamLight » Mon May 21, 2012 4:43 pm

Welcome to the ES forums!

If I read that article correctly, there's nothing new about the cell's they're using, just the way they connect the cells (and even that's been around for a while). They're using standard 18650 cells and connecting to the cell terminals via pressure instead of soldering ( :shock: ) or tab welding. With 1,440 cells for their electric morotcycle pack and (if I calculated correctly) about 10,000 cells for a car pack, I shudder to think about the pack's reliability with just pressure against the cell ends for the connections. :mrgreen: Especially with all that vibration/shock.

But perhaps 18650 cells do have an energy density advantage over other cell sizes/formats?
John M.
Owner
CamLight Systems
CamLight
10 kW
10 kW
 
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: New York City, USA

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby neptronix » Mon May 21, 2012 5:08 pm

Guys, they are using cells which are not really capable of more than 1C continuous, and will be rated for max life around something like 0.5C. The terminals do not have to carry a lot of current, and the pack will have to be massively oversized for whatever electric vehicle application they are used in.

This is the Tesla approach; super oversized low discharge rate battery. The cost ends up being low per kW-hr, but you need a hell of a lot of kW-hrs.
ES facebook group: http://facebook.com/#!/home.php?sk=group_125035107565566&ap=1

The all-arounder: 8T MAC motor on a Trek 4500.
The girlfriend bike: 350W front MAC on a 700c Trek.
The wheelie machine: 20" Rear Magic Pie II on a Trek 4300 MTB
The Bus: ??? on a 'da bomb' cargo bike frame

Pro-tips for noobs: Avoid BMS Battery like the plague | Charge RC Lipos to 4.15v, stop discharging at 3.5-3.6v | Use torque plates/arms! | Rear mounted hubs are always best
User avatar
neptronix
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 10305
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:56 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: New High capacity Li-Ion high cycle count

Postby neptronix » Mon May 21, 2012 5:09 pm

They conveniently leave out the fact that the C rating on those batteries is awful and that you need a massively oversized pack to get the same equivalent discharge..

This is the Tesla approach. Stinking huge battery of a lower C rate, to get high mileage. You can't go small on this battery or it will die an early death. It is cheaper per KW-Hr, but you need a lot of KW-Hrs to get decent output.
ES facebook group: http://facebook.com/#!/home.php?sk=group_125035107565566&ap=1

The all-arounder: 8T MAC motor on a Trek 4500.
The girlfriend bike: 350W front MAC on a 700c Trek.
The wheelie machine: 20" Rear Magic Pie II on a Trek 4300 MTB
The Bus: ??? on a 'da bomb' cargo bike frame

Pro-tips for noobs: Avoid BMS Battery like the plague | Charge RC Lipos to 4.15v, stop discharging at 3.5-3.6v | Use torque plates/arms! | Rear mounted hubs are always best
User avatar
neptronix
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 10305
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:56 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby Hillhater » Mon May 21, 2012 8:02 pm

neptronix wrote:Guys, they are using cells which are not really capable of more than 1C continuous, and will be rated for max life around something like 0.5C.

I wonder why they limited themselves to the older tech cells ?
Newer 18650's can output 2-5C rate continuous, and obviously the A123's could supply much more.
I guess pressure contact technology would not be reliable at more than a few amps. :?
This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
Hillhater
1.21 GW
1.21 GW
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:33 pm
Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby neptronix » Mon May 21, 2012 8:36 pm

Hillhater wrote:
neptronix wrote:Guys, they are using cells which are not really capable of more than 1C continuous, and will be rated for max life around something like 0.5C.

I wonder why they limited themselves to the older tech cells ?
Newer 18650's can output 2-5C rate continuous, and obviously the A123's could supply much more.
I guess pressure contact technology would not be reliable at more than a few amps. :?


It's newer tech. 250WHr/KG is cutting edge, as in, within 1 year old. A pack of those makes our 150WHr/KG RC Lipos look huge. It's what Tesla will be/is using in their cars ( which is why their packs are so large. )

Meanwhile, those 2-5C continuous 18650 cells you're talking about? They tend to store 130-175wHr/KG, coming in within what RC Lipo is at, in terms of size and weight.

In lithium batteries, as of writing, you can have high power, or high energy, but not necessarily both. The 'have your cake and eat it too' cell does not exist yet.
ES facebook group: http://facebook.com/#!/home.php?sk=group_125035107565566&ap=1

The all-arounder: 8T MAC motor on a Trek 4500.
The girlfriend bike: 350W front MAC on a 700c Trek.
The wheelie machine: 20" Rear Magic Pie II on a Trek 4300 MTB
The Bus: ??? on a 'da bomb' cargo bike frame

Pro-tips for noobs: Avoid BMS Battery like the plague | Charge RC Lipos to 4.15v, stop discharging at 3.5-3.6v | Use torque plates/arms! | Rear mounted hubs are always best
User avatar
neptronix
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 10305
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:56 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby Hillhater » Mon May 21, 2012 10:46 pm

The Panasonic 3.1 Ahr (NCR18650A) is rated for 2C ( 6.2A ) discharge ,..
and their 2.2Ahr CGR18650 is rated for 10A continuous ( 4.5C),
...so you get a choice of increased capacity or higher output.
Whilst the weight /size comparisons to RC lipo are valid, the point is that this system could lend itself to high capacity DIY pack builds using easily replaced , proven cells without a "spaghetti factory" of wiring connections.
RC Lipo will still win for cost and discharge rate, but this system could have advantages for weight in large packs.
However you would need to find a killer deal for cells to make the price reasonably bearable :wink:
This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
Hillhater
1.21 GW
1.21 GW
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:33 pm
Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby auraslip » Mon May 21, 2012 11:26 pm

a "spaghetti factory" of wiring connections.


I hate the spaghetti factory, and not just because I'm on a low carb diet.
User avatar
auraslip
1.21 GW
1.21 GW
 
Posts: 3646
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:19 pm

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby neptronix » Tue May 22, 2012 12:25 am

Hillhater wrote:The Panasonic 3.1 Ahr (NCR18650A) is rated for 2C ( 6.2A ) discharge ,..


Sure.. it can technically do 2C for a period of time, if you cool it and accept the fact that you're gonna lose *tons* of watt hours as waste heat :(

That 3.1AH capacity is rated at a 0.2C discharge. Discharge at 1C and you only get 2.8AH out of the cell, and it sags like crazy.

http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?338240-Test-Review-of-Orbtronic-18650-3100mAh-(Black)

Here is a spec sheet.

So yeah i'd consider them a 1C maximum cell. This is OK if you are going to build a wickedly huge pack. But it will definitely cost you $$$ to do so, unless you buy in super huge quantities.

Sorry to take a dump on your rainbow.
ES facebook group: http://facebook.com/#!/home.php?sk=group_125035107565566&ap=1

The all-arounder: 8T MAC motor on a Trek 4500.
The girlfriend bike: 350W front MAC on a 700c Trek.
The wheelie machine: 20" Rear Magic Pie II on a Trek 4300 MTB
The Bus: ??? on a 'da bomb' cargo bike frame

Pro-tips for noobs: Avoid BMS Battery like the plague | Charge RC Lipos to 4.15v, stop discharging at 3.5-3.6v | Use torque plates/arms! | Rear mounted hubs are always best
User avatar
neptronix
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 10305
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:56 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby csm » Tue May 22, 2012 1:07 am

flathill wrote:just need to gold plate the battery terminals and we should be all good


That is a brilliant idea! the gold could be re-cycle if needed. Perhaps could be DIY project.
csm
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 12:42 am

Re: mechanically connecting cells together with pressure

Postby csm » Tue May 22, 2012 1:21 am

Joe Perez wrote:
NTS Works wrote:The problem has been that cylindrical cells are hard to electrically connect together. The traditional way to interconnect them is with welded nickel strips. The drawback to this is that the electrical resistance is high, the welds break easily and welding together thousands of cells is very cumbersome.


So, spot-welded connections have a higher electrical resistance than two pieces of metal simply pressed against one another?


I have read reports that the spot welding process can cause an internal damage to the cell which can result in more internal resistance. I am not sure how to prove this.
I too am puzzled why we haven't seen more pop in batteries, like nimh. I suppose it has to do with trying to limit potential liability issues of people sticking them into chargers that over charge? Or sticking cells together that would be imbalanced? Perhaps with the newer lithium chemistry and more advanced charger technology, this will no longer be an issue? Perhaps cells could be embedded with RFID that communicates with the charger to give the important info on charging(voltage, AH, C charge rate).. and if it does not have the RFID tag, it just will not charge?
csm
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 12:42 am

Re: New High capacity Li-Ion high cycle count

Postby dogman » Tue May 22, 2012 7:40 am

Swimming with the sharks now eh? But the comments are correct. We've all been around the block a few times here, especially when the only source of good c rate cells was dismantled drill packs. A lot was learned about good and bad ways to make connections on little round cells. Mostly though, small round cells are a real pain. At least use 2 ah cells or larger.

When decent c rate RC lipo that didn't explode hit the market at good prices, we flocked to it like geese to a corn field.

Similaly, a lot of folks are now looking hard at 20 ah A123 pouch lifepo4 now that you can finally get your greedy hands on it.

What's hot here changes a couple times a year sometimes.
THE LIPO RULES. NEVER ABOVE 4.3V NEVER BELOW 2.7V DON'T PUNCTURE

Ideal charging /discharging range for Lipo, 3.65v minimum 4.1v maximum

See battery technology section, FAQ thread at the top of the page for lipo noob info.
User avatar
dogman
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 22035
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:53 pm
Location: Las Cruces New Mexico USA

NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby Pablo_1985 » Tue May 22, 2012 9:30 am

http://www.ntsworks.com/New_Battery.html

I get there from here:
http://green.autoblog.com/2012/05/18/ne ... #continued

It seems to be the same guy who developed Zero motorcycles.

Regards
"Todo depende de lo que te chines"-"Everything depends on how hard you try it"
Please english is not my language, correct me if you read something wrong :)
Pablo_1985
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:05 am

Re: NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby Lock » Tue May 22, 2012 10:08 am

Pablo_1985 wrote:http://www.ntsworks.com/New_Battery.html

Breakthrough Interconnection System
The problem has been that cylindrical cells are hard to electrically connect together. The traditional way to interconnect them is with welded nickel strips. The drawback to this is that the electrical resistance is high, the welds break easily and welding together thousands of cells is very cumbersome.

Our new patent pending interconnection system is entirely different. We mechanically connect the cells together with pressure. It is very difficult to make a reliable pressure contact that can carry up to 10 amps and do it for pennies of cost. This was an incredible challenge.


Hmmmm....

Upgradeable And Reusable
Having a standard sized cell that is easy to replace also means that when newer higher energy cells come out, it's easy to upgrade. There are already 4.1 ah versions of the 18650 cells due for production in 2013. This will be a 20-25% increase in energy density.


Hmmmm....

Neal T Saiki
Neal Saiki is a proven innovator of electric motorcycles, full suspension mountain bikes, rock climbing gear and numerous other products. HIs goal is always to always to refine technology until it is simplified elegance. In his spare time, his interests include martial arts, mountain biking, motorcycles, jewelry design, rock climbing and airplanes. Combining work and play has always been the common theme among Neal's endeavors.
SNIP
In 2005, Neal worked on electric motorcycles and founded Zero Motorcycles. Zero has become the leader in this fledgling industry. He retired from Zero in 2011 in order to resume working full time on the human powered helicopter.
If you like this message feel free to donate BeerCoins (BTC) to:
1LxAXWmbjY6SeMf8r9HHhSKt6pWyPvWg6L

Toronto Electric Riders Association:
http://www.ebikeriders.com/
Canada, eh?
User avatar
Lock
10 GW
10 GW
 
Posts: 4658
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 5:46 pm
Location: Toronto Harbour

Re: NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby docnjoj » Tue May 22, 2012 10:14 am

hmmmmmmmm... is right L0ck! Seeing will be maybe believing. If accurate and true it could help thos folks who like soldering together hundreds of connections. Not me anymore.
otherDoc
E-bike stable at our house
Bike-e electric front brushed C/L
Steintrike Mad Max full suspension trike rear 9C
Sun USX delta trike 9C front wheel sort of front suspension
Frame of homebuilt trike in shed with Bafang still on it
New Agniusm/A123 on the Steini and old 10ah Ping paralleled with 12 ah Fatpacks on USX
My wife and I ride the trikes
User avatar
docnjoj
10 GW
10 GW
 
Posts: 4405
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: Fairhope AL

Re: NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby deVries » Tue May 22, 2012 10:41 am

Here's a thread where I try to follow any battery capacity breakthroughs... If you haven't seen it yet, then you can find more related info there:

Attn Experts: When Will Battery Capacity Double ?

This NTS breakthrough seems to be more related to battery design & getting more efficient cell connections! Huge improvement if 15kWh gets you 100 REAL miles. 8)
deVries
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:29 pm
Location: Solar Powered 3000w Austin Texas

Re: NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby Lock » Tue May 22, 2012 11:13 am

From here:
http://www.ntsworks.com/Bicycles.html
World Class Bicycle Design
Although not widely publicized, Neal Saiki has been the designer behind dozens of world class bicycles for high end brands such as Haro, Santa Cruz and Mountain Cycles. Neal's product development business developed bicycle designs which would be sold or licensed to established brands.

Neal has been a long time motorcycle enthusiast and combining motorcycle suspension technology with bicycle design has revolutionized the mountain bike industry. In 1994 Neal designed one of the early full suspension mountain bikes and for the next fifteen years he has been at the leading edge of bicycle design.


...yet the emphasis at NTS seems more motorcycle-class... Perhaps the mechanical connection isn't rugged enough for bicycles, but do-able for larger road-going eMotorbikes

L
If you like this message feel free to donate BeerCoins (BTC) to:
1LxAXWmbjY6SeMf8r9HHhSKt6pWyPvWg6L

Toronto Electric Riders Association:
http://www.ebikeriders.com/
Canada, eh?
User avatar
Lock
10 GW
10 GW
 
Posts: 4658
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 5:46 pm
Location: Toronto Harbour

Re: NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby Jeremy Harris » Tue May 22, 2012 11:24 am

We now seem to have three threads running on this topic, perhaps we could merge them?

(the other two threads are: search.php?&sr=topics&search_id=newposts&start=50 and viewtopic.php?f=14&t=39980 )
Please ask questions on the forum, rather than by PM, as it helps others and you'll get a better range of answers.
User avatar
Jeremy Harris
10 GW
10 GW
 
Posts: 4635
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Salisbury, UK

Re: NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby neptronix » Tue May 22, 2012 11:28 am

please merge them :P
ES facebook group: http://facebook.com/#!/home.php?sk=group_125035107565566&ap=1

The all-arounder: 8T MAC motor on a Trek 4500.
The girlfriend bike: 350W front MAC on a 700c Trek.
The wheelie machine: 20" Rear Magic Pie II on a Trek 4300 MTB
The Bus: ??? on a 'da bomb' cargo bike frame

Pro-tips for noobs: Avoid BMS Battery like the plague | Charge RC Lipos to 4.15v, stop discharging at 3.5-3.6v | Use torque plates/arms! | Rear mounted hubs are always best
User avatar
neptronix
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 10305
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:56 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: NTS works: New battery breakthrough

Postby Pablo_1985 » Wed May 23, 2012 2:30 am

Merge them please, i did not see the other ones :S
"Todo depende de lo que te chines"-"Everything depends on how hard you try it"
Please english is not my language, correct me if you read something wrong :)
Pablo_1985
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:05 am

Next

Return to Battery Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 100volts+, Google [Bot], Melbourne and 1 guest