









mdd0127 wrote:Beautiful work!!!
I'm building something somewhat similar. I just finished up mounting the solar panels on my shop so the actual build starts tomorrow! It's neat to see someone really digging in to a non-hub, high powered off-road build!
I'm going to sound like a broken record again and recommend some type of slipper clutch just because I want to see your bike on the trails more than on the bench.
Also, we may be finishing our frames close to the same time. Mine is made from a little thicker stock but it's all 6061 so I might have some extra oven space available when it comes time to heat treat. They charge you for the whole oven whether it's full of not so if things work out right time wise, maybe we can share the oven or something. Just throwing it out there.

boostjuice wrote:You got the skillz and the toolz.![]()
It appears that you could make the adapter thinner however. I realise you want to be able to swap a new motor in without much fuss, but cutting the shaft length down to allow you to bring the gearhead>motor mating surfaces closer would save you some precious space inside your monocoque frame. It's not like cutting a shaft down takes longer than a few minutes. Just a suggestion anyway.
What is the gearhead part number? and how much did it cost?

Ratking wrote:mdd0127 wrote:Beautiful work!!!How thick aluminum will you use? I would love to get my frame heat treated, but I'm from Norway, and the shipping alone is too much. Thank you for the offer thou![]()
Ratking

I'm using 4.5mm and 6.5mm plate, 13mm od , 4mm wall tubing. It's going to be a beast. I didn't know you were in Norway but the offer stands. The best quote I've found so far has been $300US for solution heat treat and $300 for artificial aging/stress relief.
About the slipper clutch. It would just make it more idiot proof.....not to imply in any way that you're an idiot, just if someone else wanted to ride it you wouldn't have to give them a half hour training session about when to hit the juice and how much. Not only will it help your gearbox survive, the motor, controller, batteries... everything will just be more reliable with a little slip in there.

boostjuice wrote:You got the skillz and the toolz.![]()
It appears that you could make the adapter thinner however. I realise you want to be able to swap a new motor in without much fuss, but cutting the shaft length down to allow you to bring the gearhead>motor mating surfaces closer would save you some precious space inside your monocoque frame. It's not like cutting a shaft down takes longer than a few minutes. Just a suggestion anyway.
What is the gearhead part number? and how much did it cost?




boostjuice wrote:You got the skillz and the toolz.![]()
It appears that you could make the adapter thinner however. I realise you want to be able to swap a new motor in without much fuss, but cutting the shaft length down to allow you to bring the gearhead>motor mating surfaces closer would save you some precious space inside your monocoque frame. It's not like cutting a shaft down takes longer than a few minutes. Just a suggestion anyway.
What is the gearhead part number? and how much did it cost?

recumpence wrote:I concur on the clutch. 2 of my 3 bikes use them. They are fantastic if setup right and really add reliability to a system. That being said, if you have a stout enough setup, you will not need it.
Matt

mdd0127 wrote:On an off road bike you can also have situations where extreme shock loading is possible regardless of rolling starts. Say you come off a jump a little nose heavy, you can pin the throttle to bring the front wheel back up mid air. When you land though, if you don't get off the power in time, the drive train will be going much faster than actual speed. Even running over little bumps while accelerating causes thousands of tiny jolts every time the rear tire leaves the ground. LOTS of forces to think about in bike design.
It's not just coincidence that every road going vehicle uses some kind of disconnect or soft coupling between the engine and transmission.




Andje wrote:Awesome plan, can't wait to see it.
Im a noob on here with so take my advice with a grain of saltI've prbly read about... 40% of ES i figure.
Gearboxes have been tried by others, things like gb off of angle grinders or other power tools, cyclone engines and hub motors have planetaries, i know someone tried the banebots gearbox, and someone else has found success with a much heavier tranny designed for motorbikes.
Basically, they all report eventual failure of the internal gb gears, usually they are planetary, i'm not sure if yours is worm screw or something. Someone on here went so far as to investigate replacement internal gears that might be stronger, but as far as i know the eventual report was that the size of gear that fits in a typical ebike sized gearbox is quite weak and prone to stripping with the power often attached to them. I dont think anyone has tried your specific gb, but if you can find all the stats about it and post them with your motor/power stats i bet someone on here will do all the math for you, it's the kind of thing that happens all the time.
Having read a lot about stripping gearbox internals, i would absolutely include a slipper clutch in such a build in an attempt to prolong the life of my expensive gbMsg Recumpence, if you search his builds you can find pictures of his slipper clutch mounted on a bike, from memory i think it's about 2 inches across?

Return to E-Bike Non-hub Motor Drives
Users browsing this forum: mwkeefer, RustySpokes and 5 guests