Achieving precise BLDC torque control

brenoakiy

10 µW
Joined
Jan 16, 2020
Messages
6
Hello! I've been working on a project where I need to attach 2 hub motors to a tricycle, and come up with a control scheme involving torque control. Researching about BLDC motors and drivers I kept ending up in these forums, so I suppose this would be the best place to ask questions!

I'm using a Kelly controller in torque mode, KBS48051X, to control a brushless DC hub motor rated @ 250W, 15Nm. These Kelly controllers seem to have some popularity as far as Chinese components go, but I find the lack of information a bit troublesome.
My question is, how precise of a torque control can I expect from these controllers? Is it reasonable to expect both motors would give out similar torque for the same input?

I built a straightforward device to measure the output torque x input, using a moment arm pressing against a force sensor at stalled condition. What I found is the output torque is highly dependent on the stator-rotor angle, and stall torque is fairly unpredictable. I believe the reason might be due to the nonlinearity aspect of BLDC motors (such as the "cogging" behaviour), due to the structure and alignment of permanent magnets and stator, and perhaps the 6 step trapezoidal control scheme. Maybe when the motor is actually spinning I could get some consistent torque?

In addition, something else I've noticed is sometimes the motor won't start in torque mode, no matter the input. If I move it a little by hand, then it will start spinning. Basically, the motor won't start in torque mode for some specific angles. Could this be due to cogging? From what I read so far, cogging should be somewhat mild, and shouldn't prevent the motor from starting altogether.
 
Just because it's Sine Wave doesn't make it a true FOC controller. From my notes:

Apparently Kelly has only developed three: KBLS7280 (equal to KEB72801), KBLS7210 (equal to KEB72101), KBLS7212 (equal to KEB72121).

In general it seems Kelly doesn't have that great a rep in these circles.

Check out the Nucular, but long waitlist.

Sabvoton zombiess? also 72V150A

ASI BAC 2000 / BAC 4000 but need a pro to tune, Sevcon even more so

Votol reco, easier to program
e.g. Votol em72150
EM-200

APT too big & heavy?

_____
Edit, just realized you're talking much smaller motors than what I've been researching.

Check out Phaserunner
 
brenoakiy said:
Hello! I've been working on a project where I need to attach 2 hub motors to a tricycle, and come up with a control scheme involving torque control. Researching about BLDC motors and drivers I kept ending up in these forums, so I suppose this would be the best place to ask questions!

I'm using a Kelly controller in torque mode, KBS48051X, to control a brushless DC hub motor rated @ 250W, 15Nm. These Kelly controllers seem to have some popularity as far as Chinese components go, but I find the lack of information a bit troublesome.
My question is, how precise of a torque control can I expect from these controllers? Is it reasonable to expect both motors would give out similar torque for the same input?

I built a straightforward device to measure the output torque x input, using a moment arm pressing against a force sensor at stalled condition. What I found is the output torque is highly dependent on the stator-rotor angle, and stall torque is fairly unpredictable. I believe the reason might be due to the nonlinearity aspect of BLDC motors (such as the "cogging" behaviour), due to the structure and alignment of permanent magnets and stator, and perhaps the 6 step trapezoidal control scheme. Maybe when the motor is actually spinning I could get some consistent torque?

In addition, something else I've noticed is sometimes the motor won't start in torque mode, no matter the input. If I move it a little by hand, then it will start spinning. Basically, the motor won't start in torque mode for some specific angles. Could this be due to cogging? From what I read so far, cogging should be somewhat mild, and shouldn't prevent the motor from starting altogether.
KT motor controllers with our OpenSource firmware. There is torque control by controlling the motor phase current.
 
john61ct said:
Just because it's Sine Wave doesn't make it a true FOC controller. From my notes:

Apparently Kelly has only developed three: KBLS7280 (equal to KEB72801), KBLS7210 (equal to KEB72101), KBLS7212 (equal to KEB72121).

In general it seems Kelly doesn't have that great a rep in these circles.

Check out the Nucular, but long waitlist.

Sabvoton zombiess? also 72V150A

ASI BAC 2000 / BAC 4000 but need a pro to tune, Sevcon even more so

Votol reco, easier to program
e.g. Votol em72150
EM-200

APT too big & heavy?

_____
Edit, just realized you're talking much smaller motors than what I've been researching.

Check out Phaserunner

My controller is not even a sine wave controller, but a simple 6-step trapezoidal controller. I'm still unsure how that interferes with torque control, though. I was thinking depending on the discontinuous generated EM field angle in relation to the magnets, part of the current wouldn't always contribute to generating torque. But then again, simple current control on a brushed DC motor is supposed to work fine, with that same angle discontinuity problem.

That Phaserunner controller looks very interesting. Would the fact that its power rating is much higher than motor interfere with the performance (my motor is rated at 13A at 24V, the phaserunner is rated at over 45A at 24-72V)?
 
casainho said:
brenoakiy said:
Hello! I've been working on a project where I need to attach 2 hub motors to a tricycle, and come up with a control scheme involving torque control. Researching about BLDC motors and drivers I kept ending up in these forums, so I suppose this would be the best place to ask questions!

I'm using a Kelly controller in torque mode, KBS48051X, to control a brushless DC hub motor rated @ 250W, 15Nm. These Kelly controllers seem to have some popularity as far as Chinese components go, but I find the lack of information a bit troublesome.
My question is, how precise of a torque control can I expect from these controllers? Is it reasonable to expect both motors would give out similar torque for the same input?

I built a straightforward device to measure the output torque x input, using a moment arm pressing against a force sensor at stalled condition. What I found is the output torque is highly dependent on the stator-rotor angle, and stall torque is fairly unpredictable. I believe the reason might be due to the nonlinearity aspect of BLDC motors (such as the "cogging" behaviour), due to the structure and alignment of permanent magnets and stator, and perhaps the 6 step trapezoidal control scheme. Maybe when the motor is actually spinning I could get some consistent torque?

In addition, something else I've noticed is sometimes the motor won't start in torque mode, no matter the input. If I move it a little by hand, then it will start spinning. Basically, the motor won't start in torque mode for some specific angles. Could this be due to cogging? From what I read so far, cogging should be somewhat mild, and shouldn't prevent the motor from starting altogether.
KT motor controllers with our OpenSource firmware. There is torque control by controlling the motor phase current.

I checked your firmware page, but none of the supported KT controllers have a rating adequate to my motor.
Is FOC supposed to work better in torque control, specially at low speed ranges? Is 6-step control inadequate?
 
brenoakiy said:
I checked your firmware page, but none of the supported KT controllers have a rating adequate to my motor.
if the motors you are using are only 250w, per the below, then i think any of the kt controllers are easily capable of that.
brenoakiy said:
brushless DC hub motor rated @ 250W, 15Nm.
 
amberwolf said:
brenoakiy said:
I checked your firmware page, but none of the supported KT controllers have a rating adequate to my motor.
if the motors you are using are only 250w, per the below, then i think any of the kt controllers are easily capable of that.
brenoakiy said:
brushless DC hub motor rated @ 250W, 15Nm.

The problem is their rated continuous current, which seems to be 7A from what I could see in the photos in their website (http://www.szktdz.com/en/news.php?type=344).
My motors are rated 250W at 24 V, so around 10 A continuous would be the requisite, I suppose.
 
Phaserunner or the other Grins would be fine.

The controller being **capable** of higher power than the motor needs is A Good Thing.

CAv3 if you want to set enforced limits will help keep you from stressing the motor, extend range and longevity.
 
john61ct said:
Phaserunner or the other Grins would be fine.

The controller being **capable** of higher power than the motor needs is A Good Thing.

CAv3 if you want to set enforced limits will help keep you from stressing the motor, extend range and longevity.

How does the input map into the output torque on the Phaserunner?
I understand it has programmable parameters. If I set max current to, say, 10 A, does that mean the throttle at 5V (or whatever the upper limit is set to) will produce 10 A current?

My Kelly controller for instance, is rated at 50A peak. It has a maximum current parameter, but the input mapping stays the same. So if I send a 10% input (e.g. 1V), it'll produce a 5A current, regardless of the maximum current setting (considering it's set higher than 5A, of course).
 
Back
Top