I was thinking when it comes closer to time for me to place my order I will probably go for the iSolder option
But it's gonna be a few months worth of savings before this happens. I need to order about $7000 worth of LiPo from HK...


iovaykind wrote:I'm interested in some of those 4s boards if you've still got them. Tried to read through as much of this thread as possible, but I might've missed some stuff.. I guess I'll just let you know my setup and you can guide me on price. 16s2p setup (10ah) made up of 4s packs.
Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..

methods wrote:Most folks buy 4S packs to save a few $0.01/wh at the cost of lots of build labor wiring it all together. Although one could use our boards with 4S packs it would be an inefficient use and the added cost would offset the savings you made buying 4S packs.

Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..

Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..


chroot wrote:Methods- I'll take 8 piece of 4s lvc boards and I can stop by your friend's recycle shop whenever you are available.
Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..

methods wrote:We have a few one-offs for the adventurous. 2 or 3 of the epoxy boards. Maybe a handful of boards that are "factory re-certified". Etc. I will probably put all of these into an attractive package and sell them as a lot with some other one-off stuff like jumper cables that need re-wiring and maybe a big bag of old balance tap crap we dont use anymore.

Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..

methods wrote:chroot wrote:Methods- I'll take 8 piece of 4s lvc boards and I can stop by your friend's recycle shop whenever you are available.
I actually do not have a shop space in the recycle warehouse anymore - I am about 1 mile away. Email me and we can set up a time - but the boards are just now coming out of the cleaner and will not be ready until later this afternoon at the earliest. Still need to test themBut I like to test in batches to limit mistakes so I am finishing up the entire batch right now.
-methods

Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..


methods wrote:I finished testing out all the boards and everything is ready to ship.
I can just ship them to you if you want... it would be only 1 day via USPS Priority.
If you want to come over I am around pretty much all day today and tomorrow.
-methods

SpeedEBikes wrote:Can you explain the reasoning behind the cutoff threshholds of 3.0V LVC and 4.29V HVC?
I'm guessing the device is intended as a last resort fail safe to prevent destruction of the pack rather than the regular means for terminating either charge or discharge,
Are the cutoffs modifiable? I'd expect a tighter range, say 3.5V LVC to 4.2 HVC would be fine for many like myself who try to keep their batteries in a 3.7 to 4.1 volt operating range and don't want their occaisional screw ups to go too far out of bounds.

SpeedEBikes wrote:Can you explain the reasoning behind the cutoff threshholds of 3.0V LVC and 4.29V HVC?
3.0V to 4.2V is the commonly accepted range for Lipo. Setting cell level LVC to 3.5V would = fail because you would be bouncing off of LVC under load all the time. I understand the practice of discharging to only 3.5V but that can be done by the user watching voltages. Would not make sense to set hardware limits here. If you really want a limit that high use the CA pack level LVC Limit... no need for cell level protection when so far from cell limts.
The 4.29V comes from the fact that these are 18650 production parts - they were accounting for high internal resistance and the dynamic charge current verses the resting voltage. The reality is that if you were to cut charge at 4.2V under load it would settle to way below 4.2V - so cutting at 4.29V will usually result in a resting voltage of 4.2V. Again this is a situation where the user may choose to under-utilize the capacity of their batteries in order to gain a perceived increase in cycle life... but this can be done by simply setting the charger to a lower voltage. It would never make sense to actually set the hardware limit lower.
These boards are first and foremost developed for the motorcycle racing scene... and you better believe that those guys are getting as many wh into their packs as they can. I have seen many a rider pushing bikes across the finish line. The hesitancy to do deep cycles wears off quick in that community.
I'm guessing the device is intended as a last resort fail safe to prevent destruction of the pack rather than the regular means for terminating either charge or discharge,
The proper method for terminating charge is by setting the charger to the correct voltage for a balanced pack. I dont like the idea of relying on a BMS to terminate charge on a regular basis... this is how fires start. The Battery must be able to be hooked to the charger with no BMS for safe operation at all times.
For LVC -> I never recommend that people empty their packs - so the proper way to do this is to set Pack Level LVC in the CA -> that can cut one off early... but one still has the choice of getting more if they have a few miles to go.
Are the cutoffs modifiable? I'd expect a tighter range, say 3.5V LVC to 4.2 HVC would be fine for many like myself who try to keep their batteries in a 3.7 to 4.1 volt operating range and don't want their occaisional screw ups to go too far out of bounds.
Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..

amberwolf wrote:The reasoning and the voltages have been explained a few times in the various threads for thisbut basically that's what the parts are avaialble in, so no there's not really the option for other voltages.
It is indeed just a failsafe device, last ditch don't-destroy-your-pack kinda thing. For your regular LVC, you'd want to go with a pack LVC on your controller, Cycle Analyst, or whatever else you have on there. Regular HVC is the voltage on your charger--don't set it higher than pack voltage should be, and then it shouldn't overcharge unless there's a balancing problem, and that's the case this system is there for.
SpeedEBikes wrote:Can you explain the reasoning behind the cutoff threshholds of 3.0V LVC and 4.29V HVC?
I'm guessing the device is intended as a last resort fail safe to prevent destruction of the pack rather than the regular means for terminating either charge or discharge,
Are the cutoffs modifiable? I'd expect a tighter range, say 3.5V LVC to 4.2 HVC would be fine for many like myself who try to keep their batteries in a 3.7 to 4.1 volt operating range and don't want their occaisional screw ups to go too far out of bounds.
Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..



Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..


Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..


Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..


Return to Items for Sale - New
Users browsing this forum: cal3thousand, dutchlincoln, shn1k3rs and 7 guests