John in CR wrote:Go hook up with a hot artsy chick (eco geeks are really "in" now anyway) over in graphics design, and give this car a paint job it deserves.
Oh, and send an email to Big O. With the gov't now owning a big chunk of GM, and full electrics are the future, I'm sure it would be easy to get approval to refit/improve the EV1 to become the EV1.1 or EV2.
liveforphysics wrote:Do you have ideas on the gasoline or diesel engine choice yet?
Arlo1 wrote:I have seen they are working on a new typ of lipo that will quick charge (ie a car could be charged in a few minutes) but I have seen no proof as of yet.
JCG wrote:Hi Luke, still shooting for an ammonia-powered spark ignition engine that will run at around 20:1. I have a friend in Michigan working with me on this at Eliminator Products. I think it'll be fuel-flexible (diesel, propane, or ammonia) but that's a job for this summer. The generator head needs to be rated around 30 kWe or so. With luck and those high compression ratios, we'll be knocking on the door of 50% efficiencies (early dyno tests confirm). We really just need it to fit in the trunk.
JCG wrote:Now for the bad news - when I examined the underside of the car with the tray removed, it was empty. When they took the batteries, they took it all - modules, cables, fuse/fuse holder, disconnect plug, and main battery connector. Looks like I have some shopping to do.
grindz145 wrote:Are you going to have a title for this thing afterward? I haven't heard of ANYONE that actually had one on the road.
vanilla ice wrote:Make a mold of the body so we can make kitcar EV1's.
TylerDurden wrote:vanilla ice wrote:Make a mold of the body so we can make kitcar EV1's.
That is a great idea.
The New GeeEmm EeVee-Wun.
evdriver wrote:Seriously, you have bigger issues to deal with.
(1) Look under the dash, drivers side, kickpanel. Yeah, all that dangling crap is where the BTCM used to be.
(2) Now go over the passenger side and look in the same area. A ghost of where the HTCM once resided.
There's a couple more surprises lurking too.
And after all that; you can't drive it on the streets.
JCG wrote:Well... it's not so bad as all that. I'll be able to operate without the BTCM, as standard brakes still work (no ABS functionality though), and the repaired inverter has inputs I can use to directly connect potentiometers to run traction and regen braking signals.
evdriver wrote:It's not just ABS. There are no standard brakes on the EV1. The EV1 uses 4 wheel electric brakes. The two front wheels also include a small emergency hydraulic backup (without assist) that GM's lawyers demanded be included just in case the EV1 brake by wire system failed. You'll need both feeties on the brake pedal to stop it using those front only emergency backup hydraulics.
Don't get me wrong, I applaud your effort. Posting that you'll operate it without a safe and functional brake system makes it difficult to take your efforts seriously.
The EV1 braking and steering systems are both unique in that they are electro-hydraulic systems. The front disk brakes are hydraulically actuated and powered by electrically driven pistons (12-volt power); the rear drums are electrically actuated (12-volt power).
JCG wrote:... It's not easy working by myself in a discipline that's not my own, on a vehicle that was sitting forgotten in a garage because the original investigators gave up trying to find a place to work on it (and had no interested students). But I do want to find success in the end.
vanilla ice wrote:Tiiight car!
IIRC from the brochure the 88-91 crx was .29 and the 88-91 civic hatch was .31.. probably a little on the optimistic side.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests