
liveforphysics wrote:I'm putting together some CAD sketches of coupling together 12 of these motors along the belly-pan of a lotus 7 kit to make an EV.
If I can mount the battery similarly low, I could make the lowest center of gravity lotus 7 kit in the world, and perhaps even the best handling lotus 7 in the world. Perhaps 350hp burst, 150hp continous, maybe 1,200-1,500lbs with driver.

liveforphysics wrote:I'm putting together some CAD sketches of coupling together 12 of these motors along the belly-pan of a lotus 7 kit to make an EV.

Liquid cooled, permanent magnet, 8 pole AC motor. Up to 18.000 RPM, efficiency always over 95% (even on peak loads).
The motor is 27 cm in diameter. Length and weight depend on desired power. The weakest one is good for 30kW continuous/80kW peak and weights 42 kg.
The strongest weights 70 kg and has a peak power of 200kW.
The length depends on the power. The 80kW motor is 200 mm long, the 200 kW motor is 300 mm long.
We can also offer a reduction gear that adds 12 kg and reduces the RPM to a more ICE like RPM range.
The reduction gear adds just about 80 mm in length and 12-15 kg weight. The reduction ratio can be adapted to the specific use. We can lover the RPM to a "ICE like" range so you can use a standard differential. We can also make a reduction for a direct connection to the wheel but that setup would require two motors.


Jeremy Harris wrote:I'm already working on a controller, Luke! I've been doing a lot of work recently on building a small, high current, controller. One thing I discovered, when looking through dozens of FET spec sheets, is that there are some surprises, as a big package isn't necessarily the best. Some may have spotted that getting heat out of the FET junction is the big issue that limits the current a single FET can handle. There's nothing much that can be done about the internal thermal resistance, and this tends to be similar for pretty much any package. The big packages offer the means to get heat out of the package more easily, but this can be done another way, I think.
I've found this FET: Yes, it's a small, surface mount package. BUT, look at the ratings and then think about this as a mounting option:
What if the power rails and the phase connections were solid copper bars, connected to internal finned heatsinks?
What if the FETs were soldered directly to the copper bars, providing not only a good electrical connection, but also a near-zero thermal resistance (no insulators needed)?
What if the controller had a small internal fan to keep the "live" heatsinks cool?
I'm thinking of a 12 FET power "board" using these FETs, driven by a 6 FET controller board. I reckon such a controller would comfortably handle well over 200 amps. In fact, in might well do around 150 amps on just 6 FETs. The downside would be the 75V FET Vds limit, but as the motor is rated at 60V max this shouldn't be too big and issue.
Any thoughts?
Jeremy

liveforphysics wrote:I'm putting together some CAD sketches of coupling together 12 of these motors along the belly-pan of a lotus 7 kit to make an EV.


Mitch wrote:Would this make more sense (similar power and maybe similar price)?
liveforphysics wrote:Maybe Mitch, but then I need a $$$ HV controller, and a step-down gear box (and it's noise and complexity).

markobetti wrote:I LIKE THAT MOTOR ! UP ON THE PICTUREHEY GUYS , ON APRIL 19 WE WILL HAVE ALL NEW MOTORS THAT HAL REDESIGNED : -HALL SENSORED , LIQUID COOLED (USE IT WITH OR WITHOUT IT ) . AND JUST TO TELL YA , HALL ALREADY MADE MOUNTS FOR CONNECTING 2 , 3 ,4 ,5 ... MOTORS TOGETHER
AND A FEW MINOR CHANGES


nertog wrote:I'm certainly in for 1 if it's possible to convert this motor from DELTA to WYE (if it's wired in DELTA by default). My goal is to use this motor to power a paraglider prop of 48". Around 45kv would be ideal for this. Anyone knows if it's possible to convert any outrunner from delta to wye? And why are outrunners always factory wired into delta? Sorry for all the questions...I'm an e. engineer but pretty new to high powered BLDC's.
Looking forward to see the new motor design! Can't wait to get one








markobetti wrote:why do you need more shaft , cant you se the extra part for shaft that hal made .







Tiberius wrote:Marko, Hal,
Nice work.
Do you have the other motor parameters, such as winding resistance and max speed?
I think you said Kv=75, is that still correct?
Nick





Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests