

Sorry for the Delay hillhater, I have been hoping that the servo tester was the source of the sync problems, so I have been waiting for a throttleizer before street testing.

oatnet wrote: I think eliminating the sync issue with hall sensors would eliminate the slow-start issue (might even be able to start from stopped), and if I could pump watts in as volts instead of amps with a nice reliable sensored ebike controller,


oatnet wrote:Hey Kepler have you considered building the swingarm with mounting points for hall sensors? A simple bolt-on with screw holes for the big and little motors, and voila. I think eliminating the sync issue with hall sensors would eliminate the slow-start issue (might even be able to start from stopped), and if I could pump watts in as volts instead of amps with a nice reliable sensored ebike controller, I could eliminate a lot of resistance heat. I might whip up a bolt-on on the veritical mill in my Saturday machining class if I can get time and material.
-JD

Hillhater wrote:oatnet wrote: I think eliminating the sync issue with hall sensors would eliminate the slow-start issue (might even be able to start from stopped), and if I could pump watts in as volts instead of amps with a nice reliable sensored ebike controller,
I have been thinking similar thoughts ...BUT ..
are there any such... " reliable sensored ebike controllers" ... that can be bought "off the shelf" without needing mods to handle the 50+A @ 18-24V that we need for these motors ??
Thud commented that he has had better reliability from Castle ESC's than Ebike controllers on sensored RC motors
I fear we would be in danger of trading one problem for another !!![]()
![]()
Kepler' .. do you think your interface will help in any way with these sync issues some of us are seeing ?


recumpence wrote:I have not run the HV100. But, I do run 160s and they are flawless for syncing. Bear in mind, though, that the motor itself can be an issue. My early AXI ourunner was easy to lose sync with on my HV110 ESC, but the Astros and my Plettenberg never lose sync no matter how hard I abuse them.
Matt

kevo wrote:Kepler,
Excellent progress, count me in on the throttle interface waiting list. My Kepler drive w/ 63-74 and Turnigy 85A ESC has no sync issues I know of with three different bikes.
Cheers,
Kevo

oatnet wrote:
That excitement quickly faded. I am really, really, really disappointed in the throttleizer's build quality. The power leads were different lengths, and there is no indication of which side is batt and which side is ESC. The temp sensor leads are short enough to be useless, so I have to clip them and extend them. The cable for the rarely-used usb interface is long enough to lasso cattle; after tuning that will haunt me endlessly unless I make this a rodeo bike.![]()

Hillhater wrote:recumpence wrote:I have not run the HV100. But, I do run 160s and they are flawless for syncing. Bear in mind, though, that the motor itself can be an issue. My early AXI ourunner was easy to lose sync with on my HV110 ESC, but the Astros and my Plettenberg never lose sync no matter how hard I abuse them.
Matt
Thanks Matt,
I would hate to think we have to go to a HV160 just to run a 1kW drive !![]()
Is there any clue as to common factors in "problem" motors .. KV rating ? operating voltage, ? etc..
At the moment , some of us are using completely different motors and ESC's but have similar problems, whilst Kepler doesnt have the problem on similar kit (K force100a ESC, Turnigy 63-74, 200kv motor ) and EVTodd likewise seems to avoid the issue but with another different combo ?
Kepler... good work on the interface. From your comments, i am guessing its the current control that prevents sync problems ?.... or am i out of my depth again .

Hillhater wrote:kevo wrote:Kepler,
Excellent progress, count me in on the throttle interface waiting list. My Kepler drive w/ 63-74 and Turnigy 85A ESC has no sync issues I know of with three different bikes.
Cheers,
Kevo
Thats good news kevo, what pack voltage are you running and what throttle interface ?
Have you changed any of the ESC's settings ?






Kepler wrote:Working on an add on roller setup at the moment for those who want more down low power. Basically replaces the existing motor side swing arm and mounts the motor behind its current position. A roller then goes in where the motor goes and it is driven with a timing belt pulley setup. Should have a prototype up in the next week or two.


Hillhater wrote:Hey , Oatnet... are you still with us ?![]()
just wondering how things are going with the drive and if that throttleizer cured the sync

oatnet wrote:Hillhater wrote:Hey , Oatnet... are you still with us ?![]()
just wondering how things are going with the drive and if that throttleizer cured the sync
Month-long Internal Audit at work has sucked up all of my clock cycles, maybe by the time it is done Kepler's interface will be out. The throttlizer is a piece of crap, and evlogix never responded to any of my emails for support, so I can't tell which wire pair goes to the battery, and I am debating whether to risk my esc with it.![]()
The only thing the throttliezer will cure is a case of excess cash in the wallet.
-JD

oatnet wrote:evlogix never responded to any of my emails for support

oatnet wrote:Hillhater wrote:Hey , Oatnet... are you still with us ?![]()
just wondering how things are going with the drive and if that throttleizer cured the sync
Month-long Internal Audit at work has sucked up all of my clock cycles, maybe by the time it is done Kepler's interface will be out. The throttlizer is a piece of crap, and evlogix never responded to any of my emails for support, so I can't tell which wire pair goes to the battery, and I am debating whether to risk my esc with it.![]()
The only thing the throttliezer will cure is a case of excess cash in the wallet.
-JD


Return to E-Bike Non-hub Motor Drives
Users browsing this forum: CVillalobos, e-beach, Google [Bot], HumboldtRc, JennyB and 11 guests