
Pure wrote:I've been dreaming/planning a similar build for some time. I pretty much have it all sorted out in my head, but have yet to put anything down on paper. Basically you guys are over thinking this. Instead of shooting for a "licensed" motorcycle class vehicle, you should be looking at just an extended velomobile. A leaning tadpole trike with front to back seating for 2. You build it so that the second seat is more of a rumble seat that folds down for when no one is using it or you want/need to carry cargo. You make the seated area of the front driver wide enough so that the rear persons legs sit along side the front driver. A simple chromo frame/roll cage would offer enough protection for both occupants in the event of a crash. You really don't need a full on roll cage for speeds under 60-70 mph. So a minimalist design to the cage can be achieved, saving a lot of weight. Doing the design like this would allow for the vehicle to still be narrow enough to not be too much of a bother to other traffic in the bike lane. For a drive system you would either need a large hub on the rear with plenty of battery or an RC setup for best efficiency. Because of weight you are going to have to at least use moped rims, but they are still small enough to not require much more bulk in mounting hardware.


...You really don't need a full on roll cage for speeds under 60-70 mph.


Pure wrote:I've been dreaming/planning a similar build for some time. I pretty much have it all sorted out in my head, but have yet to put anything down on paper. Basically you guys are over thinking this. Instead of shooting for a "licensed" motorcycle class vehicle, you should be looking at just an extended velomobile. A leaning tadpole trike with front to back seating for 2. You build it so that the second seat is more of a rumble seat that folds down for when no one is using it or you want/need to carry cargo. You make the seated area of the front driver wide enough so that the rear persons legs sit along side the front driver. A simple chromo frame/roll cage would offer enough protection for both occupants in the event of a crash. You really don't need a full on roll cage for speeds under 60-70 mph. So a minimalist design to the cage can be achieved, saving a lot of weight. Doing the design like this would allow for the vehicle to still be narrow enough to not be too much of a bother to other traffic in the bike lane. For a drive system you would either need a large hub on the rear with plenty of battery or an RC setup for best efficiency. Because of weight you are going to have to at least use moped rims, but they are still small enough to not require much more bulk in mounting hardware.



This is getting close to my ideal; needs EV propulsion.Remove some of the side reinforcement tubing and add a roll over bar. Leaning and suspension would also be nice.








Pure wrote: Basically you guys are over thinking this. Instead of shooting for a "licensed" motorcycle class vehicle, you should be looking at just an extended velomobile. ..........


I thought the thread was about replicating an " Aptera" type vehicle ! ?


Hillhater wrote:Pure wrote: Basically you guys are over thinking this. Instead of shooting for a "licensed" motorcycle class vehicle, you should be looking at just an extended velomobile. ..........
I thought the thread was about replicating an " Aptera" type vehicle ! ?
I dont think the Aptera had any pretensions of being anything less than a EV " car replacement" for regular practical use.
You wont be able to do that with any superlight, un licienced, unregulated, vehicle.
A velo is great for a different role, but not really equivalent to the Aptera.
This is why i said someone should define the basic requirements, or this thread will simply be a dumping space for every daydream in our heads.





jmygann wrote:What do you see as a budget for this "knockoff". It is a tadpole trike for 2 - side by side.. "" Aptera" type vehicle "







Return to E-Vehicles General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Grey beard and 5 guests