Don't act like you've never seen a battery spec sheet before





Jason27 wrote:Ya but look what it did to that bike.. yikes!



amigafan2003 wrote: It, along with the Westfield sportscar,




boppinbob wrote:If A123 had at least 5c discharge rate it would be viable for a lot more lipo users. It's kinda of like the firecracker world. Black cats seem lame after setting off M80's.






liveforphysics wrote:amigafan2003 wrote: It, along with the Westfield sportscar,
Pics!!! 7's are my favorite car on earth.


dnmun wrote:again a lot of misinformation about how lipo fires start. it is not because they were overdischarged as in this case or because they are punctured.
thermal runaway in lithium polymer is initiated when the cell is pushed beyond the 4.2V level where it is already 100% charged. at some point while exposed to this high voltage, the crust that forms on the anode as the lithium is deposited, breaks off in sections which then exposes the underlying anode to the charge and this causes an exothermic reaction to begin which then causes more of the crust on the anode to break off and lead to more heat released as it is charging, and the continuation is thermal runaway. this leads to the fire as the pouch burns because the organic polymer will burn in the presence of air.
dnmun wrote:
there is no reason to fear using lipo, but it should be treated with common sense. methods sells a simple and effective solution and the new zephyr BMS that gary and richard have designed also will protect the battery from allowing any one cell to be overcharged past the 4.2V level.
with this level of surveillance there is no reason to fear that lipo will inevitably lead to fires. literally billions of cellphones and other devices have lipo batteries and the incidence of failure is very low, because they all use a BMS built into the charging electronics in the cellphone.
so with a proper BMS, there is no real reason to be unnecessarily afraid of using them. i don't think the packs have to be removed from the bike and stored in the oven like some think since the risk is during charging so just monitoring the charging along with use of a BMS should essentially eliminate the risk of thermal runaway.
dnmun wrote:the risk is not during storage, only during the charging process.
even when john's pack shorted out internally while stored on his shelf and melted the pouch, it did not go into thermal runaway and cause a fire.




dnmun wrote:
with this level of surveillance there is no reason to fear that lipo will inevitably lead to fires. literally billions of cellphones and other devices have lipo batteries and the incidence of failure is very low, because they all use a BMS built into the charging electronics in the cellphone.


boppinbob wrote:One positive about lipo. If some one steals your bike and has no idea how to treat lipo and also stores his ill gotten gain in his house, it might burn it down along with his family who probably shares his criminal gene there by improving earths human gene pool.

and the flip the switches to "On" and "Pain" (which means enable),

boppinbob wrote:and the flip the switches to "On" and "Pain" (which means enable),
Actually I've been meaning to put a switch up front that is a toggle switch under a red cover switch that warplane sometimes use as a missile arming switch. The one pictured is blue but you get the idea.


Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], docnjoj, DrkAngel, Gow864 and 7 guests