

MadRhino wrote: Some controllers have auto cruise, that is engaging automatically when you hold the throttle steady for a given amount of time, but I don't like those for they can surprise you by holding the throttle signal when you release.

neptronix wrote:
Yup.
And guess what? a 700c doesn't necessary have lower rolling resistance. This is a common misconception perpetuated by some of the most hardcore cyclists! rolling resistance is a function of tire friction, and hub drag, not the diameter of the wheel!
Just yesterday i had the 1.8" 26" 'city tire' wheels on my pedal bike inflated to about 50 PSI and i was blowing past the local lycra folks all day, LOL. I am a fairly strong pedaler, but here i was on a $80 wal mart mountain bike with tires that had lower rolling resistance than theirs.. and... win

sk8norcal wrote:neptronix wrote:
Yup.
And guess what? a 700c doesn't necessary have lower rolling resistance. This is a common misconception perpetuated by some of the most hardcore cyclists! rolling resistance is a function of tire friction, and hub drag, not the diameter of the wheel!
Just yesterday i had the 1.8" 26" 'city tire' wheels on my pedal bike inflated to about 50 PSI and i was blowing past the local lycra folks all day, LOL. I am a fairly strong pedaler, but here i was on a $80 wal mart mountain bike with tires that had lower rolling resistance than theirs.. and... win
I am pretty sure you are wrong on this,
there is no way that your 1.8" 26" 50psi have less rolling resistance than standard 700c 23mm 90psi tires....
if so, Tour de France riders would be riding those....
http://www.tomsarazac.com/tom/opinions/wheelsize.html



dsullivan wrote:I am planning to run a 40amp for plenty of hill climbing power and if I'm understanding it correctly , I can use the cycle analyst to limit my speeds and/or my amps. I'm also sold on the sensored motor/controller setup.
Using a HT3525 hub should I use their controller or are there others I should consider?

dsullivan wrote:Wesnewell - Could you explain more about your situation. How much do you and your rig weigh, how hilly is your trip and is it used as a daily commuter or just for fun? I am interested in seeing if your setup can help me modify my plans...


Joseph C. wrote:All other things being equal the wider the tyre, the less rolling resistance it offers. A larger width tyre deforms less than a narrow tyre.
However, a higher pressure filled tyre will offer less rolling resistance than a lower pressure tyre. Therein lies the advantage with skinny tyres - they can take much higher pressures.
Someone posted a video of a someone preforming tests on rolling resistance about a year ago that supported this. Schwalbe say the same thing on their website.
Small diameter tires have a higher rolling resistance at the same tire pressure, because tire deformation is proportionally more important, in other words the tire is "less round". Wider tires roll better than narrow ones. This assertion generally generates skepticism, nevertheless at the same tire pressure a narrow tire deflects more and so deforms more.
Why do Pros ride narrow tires if wide tires roll better?
Wide tires only roll better at the same inflation pressure, but narrow tires can be inflated to higher pressures than wide tires. However, they then obviously give a less comfortable ride. In addition to this, narrow tires have an advantage over wide ones at higher speeds, as they provide less air resistance.
Above all, a bicycle with narrow tires is much easier to accelerate because the rotating mass of the wheels is lower and the bicycle is much more agile. At constant speeds of around 20 km/h, the ride is better with wider tires. In practice, the energy saving is even greater than in theory as the elasticity of the tires absorbs road shocks, which would otherwise be transferred to the rider and so saves energy.

MadRhino wrote:Long distance racers are all about lightweight, and average pavement condition. You can beat them on a short stretch where you have better rolling tires (and are fresher), but on average long course their setup is optimized. Then, many Lycra Sunday racer wannabees are set to ride the TDF, yet only ride 40 miles where they'd do better with a different setup..

Drunkskunk wrote:Its also smoother and more efficent, as the sensors tell the motor when to fire each phase, instead of just guessing like the sensorless do.

Lebowski wrote:Drunkskunk wrote:Its also smoother and more efficent, as the sensors tell the motor when to fire each phase, instead of just guessing like the sensorless do.
Oh Dude you're so wrong here !




dsullivan wrote:I am 270lbs, my bike is an standard (Rocky Mountain Whistler 10) 19inch mountain bike with 700c hybrid tires (flat smooth center with knobby edges) running disk brakes.
Speed is not my concern 35 Km/h is plenty for this bike. I am more concerned with durability and being able to get up the large hill.
I'm shopping on the ebikes.ca site (so far) has been highly recommended.
So far my build looks like this.
ebikes.ca DirectDrive conversion Kit( comes with throttle and Cycle Analyst)
Crystalyte Motor (Currently they only show the HS3540 Version, I'm wondering if I need the HT3525) Sensored
Inferion 40A Sensored Controller
48V 10AH eZee battery Pack (a Cellman A123 Triangle 52v 11.5AH if I can get one)
Other than this I think this is the build.
Any more suggestions?



MadRhino wrote:The HS is good for your hills and offer better upgrade potential for the day you'll want more power.

hjns wrote:MadRhino wrote:The HS is good for your hills and offer better upgrade potential for the day you'll want more power.
Don't you mean "HT"?



wesnewell wrote:My inexpensive setup ($500 for kit and battery) will run circles around what you plan to buy. It will be faster, climb steeper hills, and get more range run at the same speed. 1000W motor, 40A controller running 10ah 18s lipo (66.6v nominal).

Return to E-Bike General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: CogHog, dnmun, Joppo, martx007, ronnbot, Venus, Ypedal and 6 guests