




neptronix wrote:75%?
I use over 90% of the available energy on a regular basis.
4.15 to 3.5v leaves under 5% off the top, 5% off the bottom.
Any pack being ran without a BMS will require this same conservative LVC and HVC. All lithium cells have some capacity variance that makes this necessary. It's not unique to RC lipo whatsoever.
Quality 18650's ( sanyo, panasonic, etc ) are expensive, a pain in the ass to solder, and have low discharge ratings, so you cannot really push them too far unless you have a really low power setup, or a mid-power setup with a ton of amp hours.
You can do the same capacity matching with RC Lipo. That's how i went over 90 cycles without balancing a 20AH pack. I only balanced the pack because i felt like it was a good idea to do it after a year. It only took 30 min to balance the whole thing, so it hadn't became very unbalanced during that time anyway.
There is something awesome about a 10S/20AH pack that sags no more than a 1.25v at a peak of 56 amps, cost under $400 shipped, puts out more power than i could ever need, is small, and was super easy to put together.
Nothing beats lipo right now unless you need thousands of cycles. Like scorpion says, if you commute, these aren't so bad. If your bicycle is an errand/grocery getter/pleasure mobile rather than a primary form of transport, 300-500 cycles aren't so bad, especially if you have a really large capacity pack.


flathill wrote:There is no way you can run hobby lipo down to 3.5V on a regular basis and get good cycle life. Are you talking down to 3.5V under load or they recover to 3.5V?





chilledoutuk wrote:its hard to explain my reluctance with lipo packs from hobbyking and i think this post kind or explains my problems with HK packs.
People say only charge to 4.15v and discharge to 3.5v lvc and the packs can last to 500 cycles but at what cost to delivered capacity.
one of the bigest advantages of lipo is energy density but if you have to baby your pack to the extent your only able to use 75% of its potential capacity then its energy density
becomes no greater than that of for example a123 m1 cells.
for example take this pack
http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/stor ... ouse_.html
it has an energy density of about 144 wh/kg factor in the 75% Hobby King care factor you are left with a battery with 108wh/kg that can do 500 cycles if your lucky. But cheap
a123 m1 cells also have energy density of about 108wh/kg but can be cycled reliably for over 1000 cycles.
High quality lipo packs can be cycled easily into there hundreds and in use at there designed parameters and keep there energy density of about 150wh/kg
Quality 18650 cells typically have an energy density of 185wh/kg or greater and there cycle life puts some of these cheap lipo packs to shame even when run at 2c discharge.
I have been trying to cycle a sanyo 18650 cell so that it is more in line with a couple of other cells in capacity terms and after about 20 cycles it might have lost 5ah if even that.
i am running a 5p 18650 pack built using sony cells from laptop batterys and in use the battery barely even gets warm and thats a pack with some questionable cells (thanks ebay seller for saying they had 100% life remaining lol)
Using a cell matching program kindly uploaded by another ES member i was able to get my 18650 5p banks to be within 2mah capacity of each other and from looking at my cellpro 4s when balancing they seem to remain perfectly balanced in use so far.

flathill wrote:Hey Neptronix,
What was capacity now vs new? IR vs new? How many C are you pulling when the pack is almost discharged? Do you baby it as your pack runs down? All I'm saying is you should not recommend to the average user to discharge down to 3.5V on a regular basis. Cell life doesn't probably doesn't matter in your case because you are not pushing the cells very hard.
Just a rough example, if you were pushing the cells at 20C and only got 200cycles if ran down to 3.5V vs 350cycles if ran down to 3.7V it might make you more conservative. If you only pushing a 20C cell at 1C average then your cycle life is 500+ you start not to care. I'm coming more from the average user RC world where you push a cells much harder than the average ebike. In the serious racer RC world guys charge up to 4.35V because winning is more important than cycle life (money).

chilledoutuk wrote:flathill wrote:Hey Neptronix,
What was capacity now vs new? IR vs new? How many C are you pulling when the pack is almost discharged? Do you baby it as your pack runs down? All I'm saying is you should not recommend to the average user to discharge down to 3.5V on a regular basis. Cell life doesn't probably doesn't matter in your case because you are not pushing the cells very hard.
Just a rough example, if you were pushing the cells at 20C and only got 200cycles if ran down to 3.5V vs 350cycles if ran down to 3.7V it might make you more conservative. If you only pushing a 20C cell at 1C average then your cycle life is 500+ you start not to care. I'm coming more from the average user RC world where you push a cells much harder than the average ebike. In the serious racer RC world guys charge up to 4.35V because winning is more important than cycle life (money).
Im sorry what are you talking about?
Having an lvc setting of 3.5v per a cell is very conservative already and completely unneeded in HQ Lipo packs.
I have Kokam packs that i discharge to 3v and charge to 4.2v and they have done hundreds of cycles in rc applications where they get used pretty hard.
If you were to set the lvc in your RC car to 3.7v per cell you would very likely loose a lot of power towards the end of the discharge as the controller limits the current to protect the battery voltage.

flathill wrote:Hey Neptronix,
What was capacity now vs new? IR vs new? How many C are you pulling when the pack is almost discharged? Do you baby it as your pack runs down? All I'm saying is you should not recommend to the average user to discharge down to 3.5V on a regular basis. Cell life doesn't probably doesn't matter in your case because you are not pushing the cells very hard.
Just a rough example, if you were pushing the cells at 20C and only got 200cycles if ran down to 3.5V vs 350cycles if ran down to 3.7V it might make you more conservative. If you only pushing a 20C cell at 1C average then your cycle life is 500+ you start not to care. I'm coming more from the average user RC world where you push a cells much harder than the average ebike. In the serious racer RC world guys charge up to 4.35V because winning is more important than cycle life (money).

flathill wrote:Yes, the LVC can be set well below 3.5V. The LVC setting is where it cuts out under load. What I'm saying is the resting voltage should recover to 3.7V


neptronix wrote:1) Capacity: same @ 1C.
2) IR has doubled in the 2 year old packs, which isn't atypical for a high C rate chemistry.. so my 20C packs are now more like 10C.
3) I run about 1.75-2.5C maximum at all times since i always run a particularly large pack ( typically 20AH, sometimes more. )
4) I don't baby it as it runs down, unless i need to, if i don't really have the amp hours to get home. My C rate is so low and the batteries are so wonderfully overspecced that the max discharge doesn't affect them too much.
I see why you think of lipos differently. I see them as a cheap, low weight, low size pack for long distance, since i can't get my hands on NMC which has a higher wHr/KG, yet still has decent output ( over 2C ). These are not throwaways to me, like they are in RC car usage. A very large pack will age quite gracefully over a long period of time, rather than trying to suck 50-100A out of 5AH worth of lipo.

o00scorpion00o wrote:Hey Nep,
How do you get those graphs in the logging program. The graphs I have are completely different !
The Icharger 208B can only discharge at about 1.2 amps max, I Don't know what resistor values to select, and I'm afraid to burn the charger.
But 1.2 amps is way too slow.



cwah wrote:Do you know what's the capacity of the battery after 2.5 years? Do you still have 5AH?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests