For now we can not offer you the programmable 36FET controller, sorry! We only can offer you the controller with 2 lvc switchable. Max current, block time, Regen braking voltage, 3-speed ratio set as your requests before sending to you.
For now we can not offer you the programmable 36FET controller, sorry! We only can offer you the controller with 2 lvc switchable. Max current, block time, Regen braking voltage, 3-speed ratio set as your requests before sending to you.





zombiess wrote:I thought I saw a programming header on the board. I'm guessing it might be a clone of the Xie-Chang controllers and might even use the exact same software (one of the many versions). Just try the different versions. Shouldn't be to hard to do a pin by pin comparison from the programming header to the chip then compare it to the known Xie-Chang controllers and experiment.
Even if that works it might be a good idea to replace the caps on the boards with known high quality ones.

auraslip wrote:He probably thinks that retaining the ability to program them makes buying from his our only option. Which means he is probably just a re-seller.



John in CR wrote:I'm not that worried about programming, because I know I can make it better than programmable. eg Adding a circuit to make my current limits and hi/low regen both switchable on the fly. I want to get some spares in hand before trying these mods, but afterward I'm left with nothing that I want to change via programming. The only remaining open controller changes I want and need are sine wave output and improving throttle response, but those are open items I must leave to the gurus on ES.

Kin wrote:Little note: He might be in partnership with the actual person who does programming, who would not budge because then Leo could skip him. I don't know. He's knowledgeable about what he sells, which is exciting, but I'm just suggesting there may be more than 1 reason why he withholds programming.








zombiess wrote:Someone who knows what they are doing needs to sit down and take a quick look at GPM8F3 chip set pin routing and compare it to this mystery chip sets pin routing. Should take less than 10 mins to see if it might be clone or something entirely new (rare for China, the land of copying).
I'd buy one to look at, but I've already got plenty of the great and cheap GPM8F3 (new 3rd gen 6 to 18 FET controllers), XC116 ( 2nd gen 6 to 36 FET controllers), and XC846 (1st gen old 6-18 FET controllers) boards that I don't want to spend any more money on controllers. I have way more than I'll ever be able to use.


pelle242 wrote:I did some reasearch from the original Hua Tong thread and concluded that the MCU was a rather old NEC / Renesas part. It is a completely different one from the infineon and not likely any existing programing software will do any good.

The Mighty Volt wrote:Kin wrote:Little note: He might be in partnership with the actual person who does programming, who would not budge because then Leo could skip him. I don't know. He's knowledgeable about what he sells, which is exciting, but I'm just suggesting there may be more than 1 reason why he withholds programming.
Thats true also. Who knows. I certainly am not trying to deprive anyone of an income or a living, but there must be a happy medium.
In the meantime.......
That's the best shot I could get of the chip in the Leo controller, I didn't get the schmutz on it, that was already there. Looks like a bit of heatsink compound. As we can see, there is a row of vacant pads immediately in front of it.
Flicking the board over reveals that vacant strip of pads to be all labeled "+5v"




pelle242 wrote:http://translate.google.se/translate?sl=zh-CN&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ourdev.cn%2Fforum.php%3Fmod%3Dviewthread%26tid%3D5327338&act=url
says its a UPD79F9211 .
Can be used for ebikes: http://cn.renesas.com/media/support/demo_cn/E_bike.pdf

pelle242 wrote:Can be used for ebikes: http://cn.renesas.com/media/support/demo_cn/E_bike.pdf
Feature A: 180 Degree sine wave control
Feature 2: Current and speed closed-loop
Feature 3: Two current over-current protection
Feature 4 The effect of: ultra-quiet
Feature 5: Brake energy regeneration

The Mighty Volt wrote:Yeah you are correct, I made a mistake, I will dig the other photo out presently. Thanks.

silverrich1 wrote:should I say Traolach Kaye?The Mighty Volt wrote:Yeah you are correct, I made a mistake, I will dig the other photo out presently. Thanks.

The Mighty Volt wrote:silverrich1 wrote:should I say Traolach Kaye?The Mighty Volt wrote:Yeah you are correct, I made a mistake, I will dig the other photo out presently. Thanks.
Thats up to you Nader. Or should I say......"NovemberSierra" lol
Peace bro!


Users browsing this forum: j3tch1u and 4 guests