

lukehutch wrote:I'm a n00b to e-converting motorbikes, but I don't want to miss out on the chance to capitalize on A123's misfortunes. Can somebody please answer a few ultra-basic questions about these?
-- What is the XsYp notation for batteries?
lukehutch wrote:-- If I want to e-convert a Sachs MadAss (small, light scooter-like motorcycle) to have good pickup and a top speed of say 65 MPH while operating well at 35 MPH, roughly what size electric motor will I need (in terms of power output and voltage), and how many of these A123 cells will I need?
lukehutch wrote:-- Can anybody guess how long these batteries will be available at low prices? Will this take the bottom out of the market for the foreseeable future, or should I rush to purchase batteries right now?

circuit wrote:If anyone gets their hands on these, I would really like to see how they are assembled inside, i.e. how are the cells held in place, how cooled, BMS close-ups, etc.


docnjoj wrote:...It really might pay to hold off until we see the assembly process and if they are welded. That could be a deal breaker, IMHO! Cutting apart spot welds is no fun, especially with those whimpy tabs!
otherDoc
deVries wrote:1st - There are 21 cells that could be stripped out & repackaged for about $13.50 each. That's $6 dollars cheaper per cell than just buying the bare cell.
deVries wrote:the cells Doctorbass got were ALL good & meet ALL factory specifications that are advertised.
A123 FAQ wrote:2. What is the cause?
One of four automated tab welding machines in the prismatic cell manufacturing process at our Livonia, Michigan facility was incorrectly calibrated, causing a misalignment of a certain component in some prismatic cells. This defect was undetected by our standard visual and electrical inspection. When the defective prismatic cells were subsequently compressed as part of the module assembly process, a mechanical interference was created between the misplaced component and the foil pouch which contains the cell. In certain cases, this interference breaches the foil pouch electrical insulation causing an electrical short which can cause premature failure of the battery module or pack, leading to decrease in performance and reduced battery life.



HumboldtRc wrote:
Quotation:283.3$
Order quantity :2units
Goods weight :36-40KG
Shipping cost :298.4$( need wooden cases as packing ) by DHL (3-5working days arrive US)
Warranty:NEW AND undamaged and voltage test ok
"As a result of engineering
analysis and testing, we believe the defect does not create a safety issue. A123 has not received or
discovered any reports of injury or property damage related to this situation. We maintain that our core
Nanophosphate® chemistry and our systems are safe, and this situation is ultimately a packaging issue
for which we have identified the root cause and have taken corrective action."
So connecting the dots we have:
1. Packs that are so difficult to disassemble that its cheaper to sell them for ~30% less than raw cells, in a country with cheap labor.


deVries wrote:HumboldtRc wrote:
Quotation:283.3$
Order quantity :2units
Goods weight :36-40KG
Shipping cost :298.4$( need wooden cases as packing ) by DHL (3-5working days arrive US)
Warranty:NEW AND undamaged and voltage test ok
Maybe there is a DOA guarantee, BUT there is a warranty according to your email shown directly above.![]()
Where (what city) was the destination quote given for?![]()
Thank you HumboldtRc for providing that information.![]()
At least they think the defective units are *NOT* a safety issue... from A123 (thanks Mitch!) ...
"As a result of engineering
analysis and testing, we believe the defect does not create a safety issue. A123 has not received or
discovered any reports of injury or property damage related to this situation. We maintain that our core
Nanophosphate® chemistry and our systems are safe, and this situation is ultimately a packaging issue
for which we have identified the root cause and have taken corrective action."
Btw, if that is the cost to ship to the USA, then the shipping price needs to come down somehow (by Sea or group buy or ?). Otherwise, this company will have to lower the price, imo, IMO.
So connecting the dots we have:
1. Packs that are so difficult to disassemble that its cheaper to sell them for ~30% less than raw cells, in a country with cheap labor.
That is only one *possible* reason among many other reasonable answers. We just do *not* know at this point. For example, 'why' do they state the following on the actual quote:
Warranty:NEW AND undamaged and voltage test ok
We need further clarifications AND LOWER shipping costs -or- lower pricing, IMO.

Sutho wrote:Well.....I bit the bullet and bought 22 x 7s3p units.
So.....providing the packs don't fail in a dramatic or dangerous fashion, I reckon these are good value. I also think there's a gonna be heaps available...
"As a result of engineering
analysis and testing, we believe the defect does not create a safety issue. A123 has not received or
discovered any reports of injury or property damage related to this situation. We maintain that our core
Nanophosphate® chemistry and our systems are safe, and this situation is ultimately a packaging issue
for which we have identified the root cause and have taken corrective action."

HumboldtRc wrote:I'm going to buy 2. They garantee they will check the voltage and make sure the are fine, before shipping.


Sutho wrote:4. Removing a group of faulty cells would not be an easy task....but would not be impossible either.

deVries wrote:How much was shipping?![]()

Sutho wrote:...but she did agree to replace any bad modules with good modules providing I covered the freight component...
"When the defective prismatic cells were subsequently compressed as part of the module assembly process, a mechanical interference was created between the misplaced component and the foil pouch which contains the cell. In certain cases, this interference breaches the foil pouch electrical insulation causing an electrical short which can cause premature failure of the battery module or pack, leading to decrease in performance and reduced battery life."

frodus wrote:no weight or dimension info yet?
Just need dimensional information, I won't order them if I can't put to use the modules in my motorcycle.

The Mighty Volt wrote:There is also a guy in Ireland who uses the online name of "Jack Bauer"- and he has built an EV.
Coincidence? Possibly.

Sutho wrote:I should receive the modules by the end of next week and provide feedback on their condition, voltages, etc. I will also like to build some form of test rig, so if anyone has suggestions on what this should be, I am all ears.

deVries wrote:Sutho wrote:I should receive the modules by the end of next week and provide feedback on their condition, voltages, etc. I will also like to build some form of test rig, so if anyone has suggestions on what this should be, I am all ears.
Doctorbass, Sir Battman! The Nano Battery Appears in the Night Sky...![]()
![]()
![]()
Can you help give Sutho some ideas for this?


Doctorbass wrote:Sutho ,
This is my suggestion for the test of your cells:
1- Visual inspections on arrival ( physical damage te strange things)
2- If possible put a number on each cell for easy data record.
3- measure voltage of all cells
4- record all voltages of all cells
5- charge all cells to 3.650V at C/2 at normal ambiant temp and cut charging process when current drop to C/20
6- leave the cells sitting for 48 hours
7- measure voltage of all cells ( keep appart the lower cells that have droped by 50mV for severe test or droped by 100mV for economy test
8- record voltage of all cells
9- discharge all cells or cells group (if they are already connected) at 0.5C or 1C and cut the discahrge to 2.0V ( some will say 2.5v)
10- record all measured capacity
11- measure voltage of all cells
12- leave the cells sitting for 48 hours
13- measure voltage of all cells ( keep appart the lower cells that have droped their voltage lower than the average)
14- charge again all cells to 3.650V at C/2 at normal ambiant temp and cut charging process when current drop to C/20
15- leave the cells sitting for 12 hours
16- discharge all cells or cells group (if they are already connected) at 5C or 10C and cut the discharge to 2.0V
17- record all measured capacity
18- compare for all cells their capacity at 0.5 or 1C with the 5 or 10C capacity
19- cells that have have higher diff of capacity between the low and high C rate discharge have a higher internal resistance and should be kept appart.
20- All cells sorted !
Doc


agniusm wrote:Hows the liquid cooling is achieved on these modules? Is it those holes used on the side?

Users browsing this forum: 100volts+, docnjoj, neptronix and 10 guests