
Rix wrote:Beutiful Fighter Kepler,
Don't know if its just the the video, but other geared hub motors Ive seen sound noisier than that. Is your BPM any noisier than a gearless hub motor? It sure doesn't sound like it is. Once again, super nice build. Spoke with Darrin last night, he says my bomber may be here next week. Can't wait!! Been a long 6 weeks. I thought for sure that I would get bumped back a little when Darrin and John suggested I switch my order to the bomber. Apparently not. Great Guys and a great company. So.... When you gonna do a comparo between your fighter and a stock fighter. I am curiouse if there will be any accelleration differences. Your fighter at 2KW and a stock fighter at 3KW would suggest that the stock fighter would be faster. However, factor in your fighter's much lighter rolling weight and the geared hub, I wouldn't be suprised if it could beat stock fighter. Thanks for showing your build details and posting the video. Rubberside down, or, at least one wheel. Rix


Kepler wrote:Had a very interesting commuter type ride with my friend on his Fighter and me on my Fighter this morning.Total distance was just over 12km. As a re-cap, his Fighter has the stock HS35 motor but is running 18S 75V LiPo. We have the current limit set on his bike to 55A so it has over 4000W available. Mine is set to 30A. He weighs about 80kg and is a bit lighter then me.
We road wheel to wheel or side by side for the full ride and both just peddled lightly. I nearly fell off my bike when I saw the difference in economy.
By the figures below, my bike managed a whopping 40% better efficiency.This was at a moderate average speed of 33kph
We also had a bit of drag race from about 30kph until I ran out of legs. He was slightly quicker then me but not by much. I only lost one bike length to him over the distance. You can see from the numbers below, both bikes peaked a little higher the set amp limit but this not unusual to see.
I could see one of the big advantages I had was that my bike seemed to glide for much longer when not under power. Although when coasting down a hill, both bikes seem to maintain the same speed. This surprised me as I thought my ability to fully free wheel would have seen me pull away under coast. However, this wasn't the case.
Finally, noise wise, although they had a different sound, the actual noise level between the two bikes were very similar.



sn0wchyld wrote:
I'd love to see a drag race from a standing start... and at what speed did the Hx fighter start pulling away?



voicecoils wrote:Having a motor that can freewheel is especially nice if you run out of powerBut as long as power is available, only a few watts are needed to overcome direct drive hubmotor cogging.

Kurt wrote:voicecoils wrote:Having a motor that can freewheel is especially nice if you run out of powerBut as long as power is available, only a few watts are needed to overcome direct drive hubmotor cogging.
This is something I am trying to get my head around.At this stage I cant agree with the above.Using a 5304 hub for comparison to my freewheeling geared hub I would have to say it feels like a lot more than a few watts of resistance when trying to peddle a large cogging hub motor .
I can ride the 4kg geared hub like a normal bike and not really notice any difference. The 5304 is like riding a bike through deep sand and every time you let off the throttle its like you are going up a incline and your coasting speed quickly declines due to cogging. Also getting a heavy hub motor up to speed from a dead stop is like trying to spin up a large flywheel every time.
it just from experience and I guess some hubs cog more than others.
it would be interesting to do the same ride ,with the ca limiting wattage to say 2000w and no peddling at all just motor, ride side by side or even better get the same rider on both bikes.
Kurt




Kepler wrote:I am re doing the experiment this morning again but this time with my friend's bike current limited to 35A just to see how much of an impact that will have. I think the figures will be much closer however, I am sure I will have a definite acceleration advantage.
I think its important not loose site of why a stock Fighter has a Hx motor and a massive 18FET controller though. The stock offering is all about a proven balance between performance and reliability. The Stock Fighter will hit dirt tracks hard and you know you are going to get it home. My setup, well we dont really know how it will survive in the wild. As an Urban weapon though, its looking very solid



dave.a wrote:Anyone with a bomber, could you tell me Amps drawn unloaded. Mine is 3.9A. Seems a little high?
Cheers Dave

QuietRush wrote:Nice work on the lightweight variant Kepler, frame looks clean with the controller mounted internally, lends itself well to steeper technical climbing rides like the ones I like to play on...
The weight reduction and preservation of torque for climbing gets me wondering about how it'd go with some targeted trials arena play, similar to what I put mine through (briefly) whilst demonstrating at Royal Easter Show earlier this month. The rider, Jack Field, might just be a distant relative of Al's, seems to have the same inclination for front wheel lofting. Did a writeup of the show at http://store.quietrush.com.au/1/post/20 ... -aeva.html
Let me know if you're ever Canberra bound, would love to throw it at some local rock slabs..


sethgl wrote:Hi All
Just inquiring what type of bike racks for your car you guys are using to transport your stealth bike around. Waiting to get a fighter, ordered through Quite Rush. He was nice enough to let me test ride his fighter. Very impressed, can't wait for delivery.



sethgl wrote:Hi All
Just inquiring what type of bike racks for your car you guys are using to transport your stealth bike around. Waiting to get a fighter, ordered through Quite Rush. He was nice enough to let me test ride his fighter. Very impressed, can't wait for delivery.

Return to E-Bike Photos & Video
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Drunkskunk, Juicerman, robbie, ZOMGVTEK and 5 guests