My last ride was about 43 but it was very sandy and muddy
Thanks
Lee

QMS wrote:Hey CD. There is NO binding of the lower shock mount with the bolt done up tight!!!!! Re the Fighter mounting of the rear guard, the bracket will be basicly the same but moved up the guard to mount in the same way. If you check my web site the bash guard stops a lot of mud and water reaching the BB area too!! I am working on the front one at the moment and will be mounted as a clamp design to the lower fork crown or a simple (but neat) cable tie set up. When i have a Fighter in stock PERMANENTLY i will produce a prototype set then test them then sell them,here's a couple of pics so far.I will keep you all up to date and in the loop

Cowardlyduck wrote:QMS wrote:Hey CD. There is NO binding of the lower shock mount with the bolt done up tight!!!!! Re the Fighter mounting of the rear guard, the bracket will be basicly the same but moved up the guard to mount in the same way. If you check my web site the bash guard stops a lot of mud and water reaching the BB area too!! I am working on the front one at the moment and will be mounted as a clamp design to the lower fork crown or a simple (but neat) cable tie set up. When i have a Fighter in stock PERMANENTLY i will produce a prototype set then test them then sell them,here's a couple of pics so far.I will keep you all up to date and in the loop
That sounds awesome QMS. I think I will most likely be after one of these once you've worked out the design etc.
In the mean time, I've employed BONDS as a temporary stand in.
It actually works quite well considering.![]()
Cheers





QMS wrote:Cheers CD ,well undies are designed to stop crap HA HA HAOr is that a sock???


Hyena wrote:LOL, you could have atleast used black socks
[insert sock joke about leaving no carbon footprint on an ebike]
And yeah it's bloody freezing now. I wimped out of riding this morning because I had to be suited up for a meeting at 8am but I'll be busting out the balaclava tomorrow!






Rix wrote:Finally got the Bomber. Great bike! Assembled it and took it out last night. Very fun. Suspension settings I found to be good. Rear Shock fast/slow rebound dampening. 4 clicks from all the way out. Left spring preload alone for now but will change because rider static sag is at about 3.5 inches. RST One. Compression, 8 clicks from out. Rebound was set 6 clicks out. This was the suspension setting I found to work for me and gave me about 1 to 1.5 inches rider static sag. I went down a hill with wash boards and whoops. With the rear dampening set 4 clicks out, it allowed the suspension to extend just fast enough between the whoops without wanting to throw me over the bars. The front setting was what I felt would most closely match the rear with slightly faster return rate. The RST fork is proving to be finicky. Maybe needs to be broke in. Overall this bike is awesome. sometimes I forget its a bike because it handles so well off road. Put my neoprene shock cover on. the fork covers were too tight and wouldn't slide down after compression. Anybody else around a 100+ Kilos come up with different suspension settings?

Rix wrote:Finally got the Bomber. Great bike! Assembled it and took it out last night. Very fun. Suspension settings I found to be good. Rear Shock fast/slow rebound dampening. 4 clicks from all the way out. Left spring preload alone for now but will change because rider static sag is at about 3.5 inches. RST One. Compression, 8 clicks from out. Rebound was set 6 clicks out. This was the suspension setting I found to work for me and gave me about 1 to 1.5 inches rider static sag. I went down a hill with wash boards and whoops. With the rear dampening set 4 clicks out, it allowed the suspension to extend just fast enough between the whoops without wanting to throw me over the bars. The front setting was what I felt would most closely match the rear with slightly faster return rate. The RST fork is proving to be finicky. Maybe needs to be broke in. Overall this bike is awesome. sometimes I forget its a bike because it handles so well off road. Put my neoprene shock cover on. the fork covers were too tight and wouldn't slide down after compression. Anybody else around a 100+ Kilos come up with different suspension settings?


Rix wrote:Kepler,
The machine did surprise me. The first time after I cut the wire on the CA to get full power, I took it out. I blipped the throttle from dead stop and almost slid off the seat. I was surprised. Torque from dead stop is impressive. For a brief moment, I think the bomber feels like my 450 right off idle. I love the bike. The one thing about the DNM shock that also surpised me is I can feel each click of the rebound, noticably. It lets you know if your are too slow or too fast very easly. To bad my KTMs aren't that obviouse. Can't find any DNM recommendations for rider static sag so I am going to set the Rider static sag at 2.75" based on 10" rear wheel travel with the compression turned half way out on top of the shock. Then I can use the compression knob for fine tuning. I calculated this sag based on my dirt bike setup. I run between 4 and 4.25" rider static with 13" of total travel. I sprayed some Boeshield t-9 on my fork tubes and compressed the forks a couple of times. It was much smoother instantly. The weight doesn't bother me, I am used to riding and lifting 250-275+ pound dirt bikes around so the bombers 116 pounds feels light to me. I know what you are saying though with the rear wheel though, when I popped the lid of the shipping crate, I reached insided, grabbed the bomber and lifted up and out. The rear was heavier than I was expecting it to be. Bottom line, it was worth the wait. With the wire curt, my CA was preset set at 65 Amp draw and 70volts LVC respectively with set wheel at 2055. My battery fully charged is 81.6 volts, (still breaking in) and rated for 18ah). Thats like 1450-1470 WA. While im breaking in the battery, I am going to keep my discharge to around 1050 WA for margin of error and no top speed runs. Lots of people on this forum have posted the importance of breaking in Lipo/Lipo4. Seems like the more I learn about lipos and lipo4s, the less I know. I am really happy with bomber in stock trim. Before I got it, I had all of the plans to modify it such as venting the hub, lipo conversion to 18s 3p with 8300 mAH desire lipos, and increase the power output to 7.5 KW or 100 Amp @ 75 volts. Now I am not touching it. Its fine the way it is and I need to educate myself more about Lipos and electrical knowlege and theory in general before I screw around with my bomber.
Rix

Kepler wrote:Rix wrote:Kepler,
The machine did surprise me. The first time after I cut the wire on the CA to get full power, I took it out. I blipped the throttle from dead stop and almost slid off the seat. I was surprised. Torque from dead stop is impressive. For a brief moment, I think the bomber feels like my 450 right off idle. I love the bike. The one thing about the DNM shock that also surpised me is I can feel each click of the rebound, noticably. It lets you know if your are too slow or too fast very easly. To bad my KTMs aren't that obviouse. Can't find any DNM recommendations for rider static sag so I am going to set the Rider static sag at 2.75" based on 10" rear wheel travel with the compression turned half way out on top of the shock. Then I can use the compression knob for fine tuning. I calculated this sag based on my dirt bike setup. I run between 4 and 4.25" rider static with 13" of total travel. I sprayed some Boeshield t-9 on my fork tubes and compressed the forks a couple of times. It was much smoother instantly. The weight doesn't bother me, I am used to riding and lifting 250-275+ pound dirt bikes around so the bombers 116 pounds feels light to me. I know what you are saying though with the rear wheel though, when I popped the lid of the shipping crate, I reached insided, grabbed the bomber and lifted up and out. The rear was heavier than I was expecting it to be. Bottom line, it was worth the wait. With the wire curt, my CA was preset set at 65 Amp draw and 70volts LVC respectively with set wheel at 2055. My battery fully charged is 81.6 volts, (still breaking in) and rated for 18ah). Thats like 1450-1470 WA. While im breaking in the battery, I am going to keep my discharge to around 1050 WA for margin of error and no top speed runs. Lots of people on this forum have posted the importance of breaking in Lipo/Lipo4. Seems like the more I learn about lipos and lipo4s, the less I know. I am really happy with bomber in stock trim. Before I got it, I had all of the plans to modify it such as venting the hub, lipo conversion to 18s 3p with 8300 mAH desire lipos, and increase the power output to 7.5 KW or 100 Amp @ 75 volts. Now I am not touching it. Its fine the way it is and I need to educate myself more about Lipos and electrical knowlege and theory in general before I screw around with my bomber.
Rix
Sounds like you have suspension all under control. I think I will wait for your recommendations as it sounds like you have some good experience in this field.
Very true about not needing to modify the bike. The batteries used in the Bomber (and Fighter) will put out nearly as much power as LiPo's and as only slightly heavier plus they are super safe. Pointless changing them. My Bomber came with Headway cells that are quite a bit heavier which was the man reason I went to LiPo.
Motor wise, 54xx motor is well within its limits at around 5kW. I run 10kW through mine without a problem even after 5000ml.
If you want more power, once the bike comes out of warranty, the existing controller can easily be modified and re programmed to add a few more kW. Cheap and easy to do and no need to replace the battery.





QMS wrote:Hi Kepler. I and some friends are very interested in the simple controller power mods you described for the bomber. I really want to leave the stock battery alone as it is a great "all rounder" i think. I would love a little bit more ooomph without modding too much!!!! This info would be awsome


Kepler wrote:QMS wrote:Hi Kepler. I and some friends are very interested in the simple controller power mods you described for the bomber. I really want to leave the stock battery alone as it is a great "all rounder" i think. I would love a little bit more ooomph without modding too much!!!! This info would be awsome
Check this thread out. Basically all the info you need. http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31643
I really like the mod using the trim pot. (Courtesy of Big Moose)
This gives you some control over the shunt total resistance and allows you to fine tune max current without the need to use the programming tool. It should be noted that increasing the current limit also gives you more re-gen and of course voids your warranty.




Sounds like you have suspension all under control. I think I will wait for your recommendations as it sounds like you have some good experience in this field.
Very true about not needing to modify the bike. The batteries used in the Bomber (and Fighter) will put out nearly as much power as LiPo's and as only slightly heavier plus they are super safe. Pointless changing them. My Bomber came with Headway cells that are quite a bit heavier which was the man reason I went to LiPo.
Motor wise, 54xx motor is well within its limits at around 5kW. I run 10kW through mine without a problem even after 5000ml.
If you want more power, once the bike comes out of warranty, the existing controller can easily be modified and re programmed to add a few more kW. Cheap and easy to do and no need to replace the battery

QuaziModo wrote:Woohoo! Fighter is on its way!



Return to E-Bike Photos & Video
Users browsing this forum: 70ivi452 and 5 guests