Dearman Engine - Runs on Cryogenic Liquid Air

adrian_sm

1 MW
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
2,429
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Interesting alternative way to store energy, and turn it into useful power.

It is basically a steam engine, but you inject in liquid air, and a heat transfer liquid (that is recycled), resulting in just air coming out of the tail pipe.

Source: http://www.gizmag.com/dearman-zero-emissions-engine/21201/
A new zero-emissions engine capable of competing commercially with hydrogen fuel cells and battery electric systems appeared on the radar yesterday when respected British engineering consultancy Ricardo validated Dearman engine technology and its commercial potential. The Dearman engine operates by injecting cryogenic (liquid) air into ambient heat inside the engine to produce high pressure gas that drives the engine - the exhaust emits cold air. It's cheaper to build than battery electric or fuel cell technology, with excellent energy density, fast refuelling and no range anxiety.

Think of the Dearman engine as an internal combustion engine without a spark plug, with cryogenic liquid air injected instead of petroleum. There is no combustion, but the as the air is stored at cryogenic temperatures (sub minus 160 degrees Celsius), ambient temperatures can superheat it and return it to gaseous air, causing a rapid expansion of gases similar.

When the piston is at the top of the cylinder, some heat exchange fluid is admitted to the engine cylinder. Immediately after this a small quantity of cryogenic liquid is sprayed into the cylinder; it comes into contact with the ambient (but in relative terms to the cryogenic temperatures, superhot) heat exchange fluid and boils very rapidly, building up pressure and pushing the piston down.

At the bottom of the stroke the exhaust valve opens and the returning piston pushes the heat exchange fluid and air out of the engine where the heat exchange fluid is recovered and the cold air exhausted. At the top of the stroke a new cycle begins.

Using cryogenic liquids as the energy carrier makes a lot of sense, most importantly because the energy density of liquid air compares favourably to the only two current technologies (Nitrogen and batteries) in contention for powering the zero-emission engines that will be used in subsequent generation automobiles, ships, forklifts, motorcycles, buses, trucks, mining equipment, through to certain classes of gensets.

Convenience (aka very fast re-fuelling times) is likely to be the other big selling point in comparison with the other zero emission technologies.

Air is superabundant and cryogenic liquids are already produced and distributed in huge volumes in all countries, making the necessary supporting infrastructure for Dearman engine introduction inexpensive.

Liquid air is a low-risk energy source - it is stored at low pressure and has no combustion risk. Whatsmore, the insulated tank used for is storage is cheaper to produce than re-enforced high-pressure vessels and the marginal cost of additional energy storage is very low - just increase the tank size.

On top of all of that, there are number of other technologies servicing different scales of applications that are being developed that could all use the same energy vector (cryogenic liquid) and share the infrastructure. Last but not least, none of the proposed technologies require scarce materials.

Ricardo and Dearman are now working together to bring the technology "closer towards commercial maturity."

Company site: http://www.dearmanengine.com/

And last but not least a video of the crazy inventor, and his even crazier proof of principle car running on liquid nitrogen. The video of his car is hilarious. The engine sound makes it sound like the car should be going warp speed, yet it's crawling along.

[youtube]jx-07qiaUB4[/youtube]

Some guy in the UK (Henry Clarke) just got his PhD looking into this engine. His conclusion was:
the cryogenic nitrogen car has the potential to offer a superior performance to electric and (compressed) air cars, without the long charging times. While inferior in performance to hydrogen cars, the simplicity of the nitrogen engine will make it a fraction of the fixed costs, and cheaper to run. It is an important point that if the full potential of the cryogen vehicle can be realised then it not only offers a new substitute to the ZEV market – but a superior substitute.
Source: http://www.dearmanengine.com/cms/technology/work-done-to-date/


- Adrian
 
An additional advantage would be that air conditioning systems for cars and refrigerated freight transport would be much simpler than those of conventional systems.

But to address the main concept, what we need are some numbers on efficiency. Obviously, engines can be made that run on expanding gas. This particular concept appears to an improvement in efficiency by combining a heat-exchange fluid with the "fuel" inside the cylinder - rather than in an external heat-exchanger.
I don't have enough background in the area to judge. The main guy, at least, doesn't seem to be a crack-pot like a lot of revolutionary-engine proponents.
 
hm, I'm wondering, as the nitrogen extracts heat from the engine block, doesn't that cool down ?

It would be good to build a 6-stroke though to go to higher efficiency:
-inlet stroke for gas
-compression with combustion at TDC
-work stroke
-exhaust stroke (cilinder is now hot)
-injection of liquid N2, expansion, 2nd work stroke
-exhaust stroke N2, cilinder is now very cold which helps efficieny, go back to stroke 1

I once saw something like this describe with water injection at the beginning of stroke 5 but N2 would be better
 
For reference: http://www.interesting-products.com/faq.html#How much does Liquid Nitrogen cost?
How much does Liquid Nitrogen cost?
The process of making liquid nitrogen consists of condensing atmospheric gases (principally nitrogen and oxygen), separating the liquefied gases, packaging and handling, and delivering the liquids. The most expensive part of this process is packaging and handling. This is reflected in the relative costs for "cylinder" and "bulk" gas prices. In the US, liquid nitrogen usually costs about $2/gallon when delivered in dewars and about $.50/gallon when delivered and pumped into a bulk storage tank.

One has to figure the fossil fuel load used to liquify the gas, then the conversion efficiency of a gallon of LN2 to HP in your expander/engine cycle to determine the system benefit/detriment.
 
bigmoose said:
One has to figure the fossil fuel load used to liquify the gas, then the conversion efficiency of a gallon of LN2 to HP in your expander/engine cycle to determine the system benefit/detriment.

To be fair you should assume the liquid gas is made using electricity...
You can argue the electricity for the liquid gas is made with fossil fuel
but then so is the electricity for an electric vehicle.
 
... In the US, liquid nitrogen usually costs about $2/gallon when delivered in dewars and about $.50/gallon when delivered and pumped into a bulk storage tank.
Seems that widescale adoption could put cost/vol to endusers less than the current range of fuels. The big question is how efficient could the engines be.

Funny to think that in many climates, a solution would be needed to generate/collect heat for the cabin. (We throw so much heat away in ICEs and EVs.)
 
Back
Top