Has anyone played with changing the torque sensor excitation signal parameters on a TSDZ2?
Each of the different OSF's has a different way of dealing with the variability in the sensor response, either mapping it in different ways, or averaging like the really great new algorithm from MSpider. I was playing around though and realised I hadn't seen any tests of changing the sensor excitation signal. All the current OSF's seem to use a 2us pulse in a 20us period. I changed this to a 2.5us pulse in the same period and found a huge difference in response from the sensor - basically doubled the no weight to body weight range of the sensor. What I haven't explored yet is the linearity of the output. Wondering if anyone else has tried changing this value and what they might have found?
Each of the different OSF's has a different way of dealing with the variability in the sensor response, either mapping it in different ways, or averaging like the really great new algorithm from MSpider. I was playing around though and realised I hadn't seen any tests of changing the sensor excitation signal. All the current OSF's seem to use a 2us pulse in a 20us period. I changed this to a 2.5us pulse in the same period and found a huge difference in response from the sensor - basically doubled the no weight to body weight range of the sensor. What I haven't explored yet is the linearity of the output. Wondering if anyone else has tried changing this value and what they might have found?