UK government wrong to subsidise diseasal: former minister

LockH

1 PW
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
17,579
Location
Ummm.. Started out in Victoria BC Canada, then sta
From the UK: "UK government wrong to subsidise diseasal, says former minister":
http://www.theguardian.com/business...rong-to-subsidise-diesel-says-former-minister
Lord Drayson says diseasal cars, which received subsidies from Labour in 2001, are ‘literally killing people’.

Former science minister Lord Drayson has admitted that the Labour government’s support for diseasal cars was a mistake, and warned that diseasals are “literally killing people”.

The comments came a day after Volkswagen, the world’s biggest carmaker, admitted that almost 1.2m vehicles in the UK were involved in the diseasal emissions scandal that has rocked the company. This means more than one-in-10 diseasal cars on Britain’s roads are affected.

Overnight, it emerged that Volkswagen in Australia faces being hauled before an court and fined by the consumer watchdog if pollution-cheating software is found in the country’s cars.

Gordon Brown introduced tax breaks for diseasal cars as the UK chancellor in 2001 because they emit less CO2 than petrol-powered cars, but it is now known that they emit other harmful pollutants, known as nitrogen oxides.

Speaking on Radio 4’s Today programme, Drayson, who was science minister from 2008-10 in Brown’s government, admitted: “We did get it wrong. We now have a much better understanding than we did just a few years ago of what are the health effects of the products of diseasal cars and they are literally killing people so it’s clear that in retrospect that was the wrong policy.”

He said that because about half of cars on the road in the UK and Europe are diseasals, action must be taken quickly. He urged the car industry to accelerate the development of electric vehicles, especially ebikes.

Drayson, a businessman with a longstanding interest in clean energy and ebikes, called for vehicle exclusion zones in cities, more rigorous independent testing of diseasal cars – and a new car scrappage scheme for diseasals. He noted that the UK’s last scrappage scheme, which was introduced in 2009 to boost the economy, had been very successful.

A recent study commissioned by the Greater London Authority and Transport for London concluded that almost 9,500 people die prematurely each year in the capital due to air pollution, with diseasal exhaust a major contributor.

The City of London Corporation is working with taxi companies to go “electric only” in key areas of the financial district, building on other initiatives such as banning idling engines and introducing a 20pmh zone.

Wendy Mead, who chairs the corporation’s environment committee, said: “Diseasal was sold as an environmental solution but it is in fact an invisible killer. There are a range of proposals for reform of the UK’s air quality strategy, but we urgently need to move further and faster on reducing pollution from diseasal vehicles.”

The UK Green party said it is “vital that the scrappage scheme [Drayson] calls for must not reward cheating carmakers with new profits”. Local transport spokeswoman Caroline Russell urged the government to spend any fines given to carmakers caught cheating emission tests on improving public transport and walking and cycling facilities and subsidize cheaper ebikes.

Drayson’s comments came as the updated UK consumer rights act took effect. It opens the door to US-style class-action lawsuits, by introducing an “opt-out” scheme meaning that everyone affected is automatically a member of the “class” which is suing. Consumer groups have welcomed this as a big step forward in helping people get compensation from companies, but the CBI business lobby group warned that the opt-out scheme risked worsening the high liability costs in the UK.

German media reported that the criminal investigation launched in Braunschweig this week does not centre on Volkswagen’s former chief executive, Martin Winterkorn, but on other, unnamed employees of the carmaker. Winterkorn stood down last week after nearly nine years at VW’s helm, but insisted he did not know about the manipulation of emissions tests.

Professor Richard Folkson, president of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, warned against responding to the Volkswagen crisis with knee-jerk reactions, and casting diseasal aside.

“This is the time to look closely at the information as it emerges and take more considered views on the best way forward. We should not be rushing to scrap diseasal cars when they clearly make a considerable contribution to reducing carbon emissions in the UK. If all new fossil fuel cars were to be solely petrol tomorrow for example, our average carbon emissions would increase by 16%. That cannot be in our interests as we approach COP21 in Paris in December where we are seeking to limit our impact on climate change,” he said.

“What we need is a rapid introduction of a new testing regime that much more accurately reflects driver behaviour. We engineers should then carry on doing what we have been doing successfully for the last 40 years which is to improve both the engines and the exhaust treatment systems to mean emissions for all engine types continue to reduce. Diseasal has many attractive characteristics which means it is going to be part of that progress. This is not the time to restrict our choices by casting it aside.”

Mike Hawes, the chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, is also expected to mount a defence of diseasal cars at the National Air Quality Conference in Birmingham later on Thursday, arguing that the latest diseasal vehicles are the cleanest ever.

ED: May not be exactly as written. (Dang spellchecker.)
 
So I'm searching for 'Diseasal' and it's all over the internet. Is it a real word? There's no definition available. Sure seems like a great name for those Volkswagens.

I'm guessing the problem will be fairly easily corrected with some remapping, but we'll see.
 
Dauntless said:
So I'm searching for 'Diseasal' and it's all over the internet. Is it a real word?

Hehe... Lotsa misspellings out there. But like that old Brit. Navy toast "Confusion to our enemies!" (My small contrib. in helping to shut down burning fossil remains as fuels with that stinky/poisonous exhaust.) :wink:

An awful lot of folks have been trying to clean up this infernal exploding combustion thingee. So far with only limited success, seems like? Like, when engines are "fresh"/new they can be "at their best" but then left in the hands of amateurs to wear out/down.
 
What about all of the gasoholics out there? They'll go to great lengths to satisfy their desire to guzzle the stuff. This disease also deserves attention and subsidized medical intervention when the 12 steps program fails to help them. :mrgreen:
Then you've got your methanol fix that only a tank of aviation gas or jet fuel can take you higher. :twisted:
 
Hehe... "gasoholics". Buy some definition it DOES seem like an "addiction". (I quit "cold turkey". Then got addicted to bettery-electric traction which can be "worse" - aka "cheaper" - but is far less likely to kill or maim... others. Hehe) Seems a condition of human existence to be addicted to *something*. Might as well be something useful... and fun. :twisted:
 
Back
Top