Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
There is absolutely NOTHING more confusing to the inexperienced ebike purchaser that understanding potential range with respect to the ebikes they are considering. So many ebike manufacturers and retailers embellish range claims using tricks that we experienced ebikers know are deceptive at best and down right ludicrous at worst.
Factoring Human power into the calculation is something I personally feel needs to be eliminated, because you just can't make a realistic and honest assessment between two individual humans and their power output.
Range should be based on motor power only, at a specific speed, and under the most simple conditions. And the values used should be towards the conservative side of the spectrum, that one can reasonably expect to achieve, if followed.
I propose the value of 20 Watthours per mile at 20 MPH, since the current US ebike guidelines limit legal ebike speeds to 20 MPH, and this is a speed that can be achieved relatively easily with a legal 750W motor. Conditions would also include: a flat, smooth road, no stopping & starting or hills, on an upright mountain bike (high drag coefficient).
The intent is NOT to argue about the minor efficiency differences between system A (DD Hub Motor) vs. system B (Mid Drive) vs. system C (Geared Hub) etc. Yes, there will be minor differences in the efficiencies of these systems.
The POINT is to make a simple method for less experienced ebike customers to assess range between the different bicycles they are looking at, and the most critical component of range is the energy capacity of the battery, in Watthours. I argue that WATTHOURS should be THE ONLY value that can be reasonably compared between any number of ebike power systems.
And the Formula for Calculating range should be as follows:
Battery Nominal Voltage x Battery Capacity (AmpHours) / 20 WattHours/Mile.
Example:
48V12Ah Battery  would have 48x12 = 576 WattHours of Energy / 20 WH/Mile = 28.8 Miles of range (at 20 MPH, motor only).
Apologies to the rest of the world that uses the metric system. The equivalent of the above formula would be 32 KPH speed, and 12.3 WattHours/Km, which is much less easily remembered.
Perhaps EndlessSphere could create a "Certification" for Ebike manufacturers and retailers who agree to use our formula for range calculation in their advertising...
Call it draconian if you want, but I think the ebike buying community would greatly appreciate some straight talk with respect to range, even if it is very generalized.
Here's my Youtube Rant. (NSFW warning)
Factoring Human power into the calculation is something I personally feel needs to be eliminated, because you just can't make a realistic and honest assessment between two individual humans and their power output.
Range should be based on motor power only, at a specific speed, and under the most simple conditions. And the values used should be towards the conservative side of the spectrum, that one can reasonably expect to achieve, if followed.
I propose the value of 20 Watthours per mile at 20 MPH, since the current US ebike guidelines limit legal ebike speeds to 20 MPH, and this is a speed that can be achieved relatively easily with a legal 750W motor. Conditions would also include: a flat, smooth road, no stopping & starting or hills, on an upright mountain bike (high drag coefficient).
The intent is NOT to argue about the minor efficiency differences between system A (DD Hub Motor) vs. system B (Mid Drive) vs. system C (Geared Hub) etc. Yes, there will be minor differences in the efficiencies of these systems.
The POINT is to make a simple method for less experienced ebike customers to assess range between the different bicycles they are looking at, and the most critical component of range is the energy capacity of the battery, in Watthours. I argue that WATTHOURS should be THE ONLY value that can be reasonably compared between any number of ebike power systems.
And the Formula for Calculating range should be as follows:
Battery Nominal Voltage x Battery Capacity (AmpHours) / 20 WattHours/Mile.
Example:
48V12Ah Battery  would have 48x12 = 576 WattHours of Energy / 20 WH/Mile = 28.8 Miles of range (at 20 MPH, motor only).
Apologies to the rest of the world that uses the metric system. The equivalent of the above formula would be 32 KPH speed, and 12.3 WattHours/Km, which is much less easily remembered.
Perhaps EndlessSphere could create a "Certification" for Ebike manufacturers and retailers who agree to use our formula for range calculation in their advertising...
Call it draconian if you want, but I think the ebike buying community would greatly appreciate some straight talk with respect to range, even if it is very generalized.
Here's my Youtube Rant. (NSFW warning)
DD Hubs, Batteries, Controllers & Custom Ebikes.
http://westcoastelectrics.com
West Coast Electric Cycles
Bellevue, WA
USA
http://westcoastelectrics.com
West Coast Electric Cycles
Bellevue, WA
USA
 spinningmagnets 100 GW
 Posts: 10868
 Joined: Dec 21 2007 10:27pm
 Location: Ft Riley, NE Kansas
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
I agree, there is never going to be a "perfect" algorithm for all systems and all ebike riders, but...this proposal is very reasonable. It's a good start.I propose the value of 20 Watthours per mile at 20 MPH, since the current US ebike guidelines limit legal ebike speeds to 20 MPH, and this is a speed that can be achieved relatively easily with a legal 750W motor. Conditions would also include: a flat, smooth road, no stopping & starting or hills, on an upright mountain bike (high drag coefficient)
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
With respect to lower wattage limits and slower top speeds for other Countries (i.e. 250W limit, and 25 KPH Top Speeds in many countries) it might make sense to add the following range calculation, which due to the slower top speed, would naturally be MORE efficient, and correlate to longer range for these speed & power limited countries (And in Metric):
10 Watthours/Kilometer at 25 KPH.
i.e.: 36V8.8Ah battery = 316.8 WattHours / 10 = 31.68 Kilometers of Range @ 25 KPH.
10 Watthours/Kilometer at 25 KPH.
i.e.: 36V8.8Ah battery = 316.8 WattHours / 10 = 31.68 Kilometers of Range @ 25 KPH.
DD Hubs, Batteries, Controllers & Custom Ebikes.
http://westcoastelectrics.com
West Coast Electric Cycles
Bellevue, WA
USA
http://westcoastelectrics.com
West Coast Electric Cycles
Bellevue, WA
USA
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
Good idea. Maybe call it Max Range on Battery or Max Battery Range.
May your tote always stay tight and your edge eversharp
my eTownie build thread: http://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewto ... =6&t=23701
 amberwolf 100 GW
 Posts: 26014
 Joined: Aug 17 2009 6:43am
 Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA, Earth, Sol, Local Bubble, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group
 Contact:
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
I commend the idea, but as long as they can get away with it, sellers (and manufacturers) are going to claim the highest possible range they can to make them sound better than the next guy, like they do now.
Even if that range is supposedly on a foreverlength downhill with a hurricaneforce tailwind while pedalling like a madman. :/
Just cuz too many people are greedy and deceptive.
Other than that, the formula seems reasonable for average city riding conditions.
Even if that range is supposedly on a foreverlength downhill with a hurricaneforce tailwind while pedalling like a madman. :/
Just cuz too many people are greedy and deceptive.
Other than that, the formula seems reasonable for average city riding conditions.
If you found this advice helpful, supporting contributions are accepted here.
"if it ain't broke, improve it till it is"DogHauler Cargo eTrike SB CruiserTiny's Wheelchair ProjectCargo eBike CrazyBike2House Fire Updates & General Blog
"if it ain't broke, improve it till it is"DogHauler Cargo eTrike SB CruiserTiny's Wheelchair ProjectCargo eBike CrazyBike2House Fire Updates & General Blog
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
I fully agree with this idea, and I have one suggestion which may make it more intuitive and marketable outside of EV enthusiasts. I'm not trying to start an argument here, but I'll include some additional info to back up my suggestion.
Instead of making range the only factor, include the efficiency. The two combined would give a more wholistic view of the bike. Range by itself doesn't say much. For instance, looking at a diesel semi tractortrailer truck, 240 gallons of fuel is the normal capacity, so, depending on load, speed traveled, vehicles specs, terrain, etc. one can expect 960 to 1920 miles on a full fuel load, roughly. But depending on a number of factors, you can expect just 48 miles per gallon. Compare that to a compact car that carries 14 gallons of fuel you can expect it to get 448532 miles on a full tank. However that compact car is getting 3238 combined miles per gallon. So you can see that the range alone doesn't really tell us much about the system as a whole.
Here's an example:
Light bike, small battery, lower voltage example: 48V, 7Ah = 336Wh potential.
Heavy bike, big battery, higher voltage example: 52V, 25Ah = 1,144Wh potential.
Using the above formula for the light bike we'd get: 16.8 miles estimated unassisted range (336/20). Likewise, for the heavy bike, we'd get 57 miles estimated unassisted range.
Then we can include two efficiency ratings (like they do for cars with a highway/city efficiency rating): I propose "urban" (for short, interrupted stop and go situations) and "touring" (for nonstop, top speed situations). Just like with cars, these efficiency ratings would be measured by realworld testing and can be determined by the manufacturer during product testing and development.
Lets say the light bike with average riders was seeing consumption levels of 5Wh/m in the "city" situation, and 10Wh/m in the "touring" situation. That would give efficiencies of 0.2 M/Wh "city" and 0.1 M/Wh "touring". Now the heavy bike lets say was seeing more like 20Wh/m "city", and 25Wh/m "touring". That would give the heavy bike efficiencies of 0.05 M/Wh "city" and 0.04 M/Wh "touring".
These additional numbers provide the prospective buyer with a more fully informed image of how the vehicle will perform in their desired typical riding scenario. Do you go with the bike that can go 16.8 miles per charge, but with greater efficiency, or do you get the bike that can go 57 miles but resulting in less efficiency.
You can also use those efficiency numbers to weigh against the price as well since bigger batteries cost more and require a more powerful (and expensive) motor. If light bike costs $1,200 and heavy bike costs $4,000, you can say that light bike will get you 240 city miles or 120 touring miles per dollar and heavy bike will get you 200 city miles or 160 touring miles per dollar.
Range alone makes these bikes seem night and day different and very hard to compare. But when you factor in efficiency, you can see that in cost per mile, they are actually very close. It helps make the question of "how far do I want to go and how much to I want to spend" easier.
Just my 2 cents on the topic. Either way, I definitely agree with the OP in that we should have a unified "estimated unassisted range" rating.
Instead of making range the only factor, include the efficiency. The two combined would give a more wholistic view of the bike. Range by itself doesn't say much. For instance, looking at a diesel semi tractortrailer truck, 240 gallons of fuel is the normal capacity, so, depending on load, speed traveled, vehicles specs, terrain, etc. one can expect 960 to 1920 miles on a full fuel load, roughly. But depending on a number of factors, you can expect just 48 miles per gallon. Compare that to a compact car that carries 14 gallons of fuel you can expect it to get 448532 miles on a full tank. However that compact car is getting 3238 combined miles per gallon. So you can see that the range alone doesn't really tell us much about the system as a whole.
Here's an example:
Light bike, small battery, lower voltage example: 48V, 7Ah = 336Wh potential.
Heavy bike, big battery, higher voltage example: 52V, 25Ah = 1,144Wh potential.
Using the above formula for the light bike we'd get: 16.8 miles estimated unassisted range (336/20). Likewise, for the heavy bike, we'd get 57 miles estimated unassisted range.
Then we can include two efficiency ratings (like they do for cars with a highway/city efficiency rating): I propose "urban" (for short, interrupted stop and go situations) and "touring" (for nonstop, top speed situations). Just like with cars, these efficiency ratings would be measured by realworld testing and can be determined by the manufacturer during product testing and development.
Lets say the light bike with average riders was seeing consumption levels of 5Wh/m in the "city" situation, and 10Wh/m in the "touring" situation. That would give efficiencies of 0.2 M/Wh "city" and 0.1 M/Wh "touring". Now the heavy bike lets say was seeing more like 20Wh/m "city", and 25Wh/m "touring". That would give the heavy bike efficiencies of 0.05 M/Wh "city" and 0.04 M/Wh "touring".
These additional numbers provide the prospective buyer with a more fully informed image of how the vehicle will perform in their desired typical riding scenario. Do you go with the bike that can go 16.8 miles per charge, but with greater efficiency, or do you get the bike that can go 57 miles but resulting in less efficiency.
You can also use those efficiency numbers to weigh against the price as well since bigger batteries cost more and require a more powerful (and expensive) motor. If light bike costs $1,200 and heavy bike costs $4,000, you can say that light bike will get you 240 city miles or 120 touring miles per dollar and heavy bike will get you 200 city miles or 160 touring miles per dollar.
Range alone makes these bikes seem night and day different and very hard to compare. But when you factor in efficiency, you can see that in cost per mile, they are actually very close. It helps make the question of "how far do I want to go and how much to I want to spend" easier.
Just my 2 cents on the topic. Either way, I definitely agree with the OP in that we should have a unified "estimated unassisted range" rating.
~01~
 amberwolf 100 GW
 Posts: 26014
 Joined: Aug 17 2009 6:43am
 Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA, Earth, Sol, Local Bubble, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group
 Contact:
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
I might be misunderstanding what you mean, but the 20wh/mile in the original equation *is* the efficiency, as a generally worstcase estimation. Inverting the number gives you miles/wh, if you want that number.
Different bikes and different riding styles, terrains, weather conditions, etc., will all affect that, but I think the idea behind the simple formula is to give something that is relatively realisic under most city riding conditions (where most of these bikes would probably be used); 20wh/mile is more than most would use; even my Crazybike2 was 2230wh/mile most of the timethe higher values during commuting with lots of stops and starts, and the lower values on longer trips with fewer stops and starts. All of my riding is on the flats, with little wind, but either one of those being different could increase or decrease the wh/mile (efficiency) significantly.
So you can use a different number in the wh/mile part of the formula, but its not just the bike that accounts for thatits the usage, and thats where the existing problem lies, in that presently sellers and manufacturers rate the range for the *best* case usage.
It would be possible to characterize each different model of ebike to give efficiencies for all possible conditions, or even just a preselected few that would be standard tests, but I dont imagine most (any) sellers or manufacturers ever doing that (or doing it identically, per a standardized test routine, if they coudl be bothered at all), so they might just estimate what it would really perform like, and at taht point we might as well go with the original single formula.
Different bikes and different riding styles, terrains, weather conditions, etc., will all affect that, but I think the idea behind the simple formula is to give something that is relatively realisic under most city riding conditions (where most of these bikes would probably be used); 20wh/mile is more than most would use; even my Crazybike2 was 2230wh/mile most of the timethe higher values during commuting with lots of stops and starts, and the lower values on longer trips with fewer stops and starts. All of my riding is on the flats, with little wind, but either one of those being different could increase or decrease the wh/mile (efficiency) significantly.
So you can use a different number in the wh/mile part of the formula, but its not just the bike that accounts for thatits the usage, and thats where the existing problem lies, in that presently sellers and manufacturers rate the range for the *best* case usage.
It would be possible to characterize each different model of ebike to give efficiencies for all possible conditions, or even just a preselected few that would be standard tests, but I dont imagine most (any) sellers or manufacturers ever doing that (or doing it identically, per a standardized test routine, if they coudl be bothered at all), so they might just estimate what it would really perform like, and at taht point we might as well go with the original single formula.
If you found this advice helpful, supporting contributions are accepted here.
"if it ain't broke, improve it till it is"DogHauler Cargo eTrike SB CruiserTiny's Wheelchair ProjectCargo eBike CrazyBike2House Fire Updates & General Blog
"if it ain't broke, improve it till it is"DogHauler Cargo eTrike SB CruiserTiny's Wheelchair ProjectCargo eBike CrazyBike2House Fire Updates & General Blog
 amberwolf 100 GW
 Posts: 26014
 Joined: Aug 17 2009 6:43am
 Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA, Earth, Sol, Local Bubble, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group
 Contact:
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
Mmm...I think you have that backwards unless Im misunderstanding what you mean.
The batteries dont weigh that much vs all the other stuff to require significantly more power to move a bigger one around vs a smaller one, but a bigger motor (and higher power controller) does generally require a bigger battery to either support it at all, or at least to get the same range as a smaller motor/lighter bike/etc might need.
If you found this advice helpful, supporting contributions are accepted here.
"if it ain't broke, improve it till it is"DogHauler Cargo eTrike SB CruiserTiny's Wheelchair ProjectCargo eBike CrazyBike2House Fire Updates & General Blog
"if it ain't broke, improve it till it is"DogHauler Cargo eTrike SB CruiserTiny's Wheelchair ProjectCargo eBike CrazyBike2House Fire Updates & General Blog
 dogman dan 100 GW
 Posts: 34558
 Joined: May 17 2008 12:53pm
 Location: Las Cruces New Mexico USA
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
FWIW, I did help fact check the ranges claimed by one vendor, Ebikekit. I did real tests of range at level 25 power settings. EBK never considered claiming the range you'd get riding in level 1 like most do. We called that limp home mode.
For 20 mph, 20wh/mi is pretty dead on. If its flat or mild rolling hills, the rider is not fat, and the weather is mild.
I'm sticking by my rule of thumb from 2008, 1 ah per mile of 36v, and .75 ah per mile of 48v. This is NOT your range, but what will get you a practical size battery for a commute or other repeated ride. It includes a fairly large reserve, which will still not be enough when the wind is in your face riding home in winter. This number is also based on about 25 wh/mi, at speed slightly over 20 mph. Many will want to ride full speed on 36v. Full speed 48v will be back to 1 ah per mile.
For max range at sub 20 mph, including moderate to mild pedaling, double it.
For 20 mph, 20wh/mi is pretty dead on. If its flat or mild rolling hills, the rider is not fat, and the weather is mild.
I'm sticking by my rule of thumb from 2008, 1 ah per mile of 36v, and .75 ah per mile of 48v. This is NOT your range, but what will get you a practical size battery for a commute or other repeated ride. It includes a fairly large reserve, which will still not be enough when the wind is in your face riding home in winter. This number is also based on about 25 wh/mi, at speed slightly over 20 mph. Many will want to ride full speed on 36v. Full speed 48v will be back to 1 ah per mile.
For max range at sub 20 mph, including moderate to mild pedaling, double it.
Frankenbike longtail
http://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewto ... cing+betty.
bolt on longtail https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74584
The mixte long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74384
Beach cruiser converted to long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... r#p1045572
http://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewto ... cing+betty.
bolt on longtail https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74584
The mixte long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74384
Beach cruiser converted to long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... r#p1045572
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
I always get asked about "How far can you go on that thing"
Then I say things like...
"Well the battery determines that, think of the battery as the fuel tank"
"Depends on how hilly it is, how fast you are going, your total weight including cargo"
"My battery can go 25km"
Then they ask how fast can you go. Which depends on the voltage, but I usually say 55km/h. When asked by The Fuzz, 30kph
Then I say things like...
"Well the battery determines that, think of the battery as the fuel tank"
"Depends on how hilly it is, how fast you are going, your total weight including cargo"
"My battery can go 25km"
Then they ask how fast can you go. Which depends on the voltage, but I usually say 55km/h. When asked by The Fuzz, 30kph

 Posts: 13590
 Joined: May 20 2008 12:58am
 Location: Paradise
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
20wh/mile is a nice benchmark, but 100wh/mile or more is just too much fun.
 LockH 100 GW
 Posts: 17577
 Joined: Jul 09 2013 11:06pm
 Location: Ummm.. Started out in Victoria BC Canada, then started to move around... Oh oh.
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
Hmmm... tried searching this thread for "ambient"... "Ambient" includes road surfaces, air temps, winds speeds and directions... weights added to vehicle as cargo or passenger... urban or rural aka "traffic"... and "stopandgoes"... "age" of battery... Hehe... probably goes on and on... so maybe just qualify with Plus/Minus AMBIENTS to any "standard formula"?
ES changed my life (for the waaaaay better).
Eff. June, 2014 Phoenix Ebike Promotions
(Current ride? High speed lawn chair.)
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57408
Phoenix Ebike Promotions conversion kit (work in progress. More drink holders, etc etc)
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=60564
Joined yer local chapter of EA yet?
(Ebikers Anonymous  Where we're all miserable failures, but the parties are hilarious...)
Eff. June, 2014 Phoenix Ebike Promotions
(Current ride? High speed lawn chair.)
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57408
Phoenix Ebike Promotions conversion kit (work in progress. More drink holders, etc etc)
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=60564
Joined yer local chapter of EA yet?
(Ebikers Anonymous  Where we're all miserable failures, but the parties are hilarious...)

 Posts: 3100
 Joined: Aug 10 2008 8:28pm
 Location: About 1200 miles south of Chicago, in sunny/rainny Port Richey, Florida!
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
I like your way of thinkin! Yes fun is probably why most here have Ebikes. I know commuting is one thing, mine too, but many use the bike to have fun while commuting. No they don't see 100wh/mi like you, but, fun is fun!John in CR wrote: ↑Apr 19 2018 7:45am20wh/mile is a nice benchmark, but 100wh/mile or more is just too much fun.
I see from 18 to 24wh/mi at 20 mph. So I average about 2 miles per AH.
At 35mph I don't even bother to look at the CA.
Dan
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
just noticed this, can't you just calc the same way that the industry does for electric cars? for example you didn't even include weight. just look at how electric cars calculate their mileage, adjust for motor efficiency, you should be in the ballpark. the problem isn't that the companies aren't giving good mileage numbers, to be certain they are not, but you seem to be heading at it from the bottom instead of noticing that for years this has been a normal calculation in an established industry, one that include allot of variables that the manufacturer of a bike really cannot know. the creator of a diy bike could figure it out, but only roughly because aero is a pretty big factor. i got an ebike specifically because of wind, i bet that plays a role huh?teslanv wrote: ↑Apr 16 2018 9:13amThere is absolutely NOTHING more confusing to the inexperienced ebike purchaser that understanding potential range with respect to the ebikes they are considering. So many ebike manufacturers and retailers embellish range claims using tricks that we experienced ebikers know are deceptive at best and down right ludicrous at worst.
Factoring Human power into the calculation is something I personally feel needs to be eliminated, because you just can't make a realistic and honest assessment between two individual humans and their power output.
Range should be based on motor power only, at a specific speed, and under the most simple conditions. And the values used should be towards the conservative side of the spectrum, that one can reasonably expect to achieve, if followed.
I propose the value of 20 Watthours per mile at 20 MPH, since the current US ebike guidelines limit legal ebike speeds to 20 MPH, and this is a speed that can be achieved relatively easily with a legal 750W motor. Conditions would also include: a flat, smooth road, no stopping & starting or hills, on an upright mountain bike (high drag coefficient).
The intent is NOT to argue about the minor efficiency differences between system A (DD Hub Motor) vs. system B (Mid Drive) vs. system C (Geared Hub) etc. Yes, there will be minor differences in the efficiencies of these systems.
The POINT is to make a simple method for less experienced ebike customers to assess range between the different bicycles they are looking at, and the most critical component of range is the energy capacity of the battery, in Watthours. I argue that WATTHOURS should be THE ONLY value that can be reasonably compared between any number of ebike power systems.
And the Formula for Calculating range should be as follows:
Battery Nominal Voltage x Battery Capacity (AmpHours) / 20 WattHours/Mile.
Example:
48V12Ah Battery  would have 48x12 = 576 WattHours of Energy / 20 WH/Mile = 28.8 Miles of range (at 20 MPH, motor only).
Apologies to the rest of the world that uses the metric system. The equivalent of the above formula would be 32 KPH speed, and 12.3 WattHours/Km, which is much less easily remembered.
Perhaps EndlessSphere could create a "Certification" for Ebike manufacturers and retailers who agree to use our formula for range calculation in their advertising...
Call it draconian if you want, but I think the ebike buying community would greatly appreciate some straight talk with respect to range, even if it is very generalized.
Here's my Youtube Rant. (NSFW warning)
 dogman dan 100 GW
 Posts: 34558
 Joined: May 17 2008 12:53pm
 Location: Las Cruces New Mexico USA
Re: Standard formula for Calculating Ebike Range
Wind can easily cut your range in half. When I had it 15 uphill miles home on my commute, it took me 12 ah of 48v to get home at 25 mph/15 mph. 15mph on the steepest two miles. Add 30 mph headwind to that, and I'd better slow to 15 mph the whole ride, and even then I often ran out a block from home.
The basic problem with industry range claims is that many want to claim the maximum range as typical, when its not.
Typically you buy an ebike to pedal less, and go faster. So putting a guy that generally rides 200 miles a week on an e bike, then selecting level one, doesn't give you a real range number. Yes, its not a lie, just a bit like saying my car gets 60 mpg, because it did once, going 30 mph with a 30 mph tailwind.
My first kit, they said 20 miles at 20 mph.. for 36v 12 ah lead. The truth was 6 miles at 20 mph, which started me on this journey to find out what real range was. If you go back to my rule of thumb, and figure that at full speed you get 6 ah from 12 ah lead, you start to see where my range rule got its start. Once I got lithium, 20 ah took me a maximum 22 miles @ 25 mph.
Back to the EBK ranges.. we got good data that allowed us to really explain ranges, and then we put it up on the website in the blog. There we were able to explain how different assist levels changed the maximum speed, greatly affecting range, and why. The simpler range claim we put on the product page was a spread. So say the kit was 36v 10 ah battery, we'd say something like 1030 miles range for it. To get the 30, you indeed had to pedal a lot, as you must if you ride in level 2. in level 2 no pedaling, you'd barely be reaching 8 mph. Pedaling hard, more like 12 mph. At 12 mph, just about any e bike gets fantastic wh/mi, like 12 in this example.
So while many vendors will be saying some crazy ranges, ( technically true btw) those Jason claims are real. Some sound crazy high, like the range from a liberty trike with 10 ah battery. But that trikes max speed is 12 mph. So it does go an unbelievable distance.
The basic problem with industry range claims is that many want to claim the maximum range as typical, when its not.
Typically you buy an ebike to pedal less, and go faster. So putting a guy that generally rides 200 miles a week on an e bike, then selecting level one, doesn't give you a real range number. Yes, its not a lie, just a bit like saying my car gets 60 mpg, because it did once, going 30 mph with a 30 mph tailwind.
My first kit, they said 20 miles at 20 mph.. for 36v 12 ah lead. The truth was 6 miles at 20 mph, which started me on this journey to find out what real range was. If you go back to my rule of thumb, and figure that at full speed you get 6 ah from 12 ah lead, you start to see where my range rule got its start. Once I got lithium, 20 ah took me a maximum 22 miles @ 25 mph.
Back to the EBK ranges.. we got good data that allowed us to really explain ranges, and then we put it up on the website in the blog. There we were able to explain how different assist levels changed the maximum speed, greatly affecting range, and why. The simpler range claim we put on the product page was a spread. So say the kit was 36v 10 ah battery, we'd say something like 1030 miles range for it. To get the 30, you indeed had to pedal a lot, as you must if you ride in level 2. in level 2 no pedaling, you'd barely be reaching 8 mph. Pedaling hard, more like 12 mph. At 12 mph, just about any e bike gets fantastic wh/mi, like 12 in this example.
So while many vendors will be saying some crazy ranges, ( technically true btw) those Jason claims are real. Some sound crazy high, like the range from a liberty trike with 10 ah battery. But that trikes max speed is 12 mph. So it does go an unbelievable distance.
Frankenbike longtail
http://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewto ... cing+betty.
bolt on longtail https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74584
The mixte long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74384
Beach cruiser converted to long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... r#p1045572
http://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewto ... cing+betty.
bolt on longtail https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74584
The mixte long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... =6&t=74384
Beach cruiser converted to long tail. https://endlesssphere.com/forums/viewt ... r#p1045572