Batteries, Chargers, and Battery Management Systems.
-
frnandu 1 mW

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Jan 24 2019 5:55am
Post
by frnandu » Aug 13 2019 6:43am
eee291 wrote: ↑Aug 13 2019 6:37am
In that last pic it looks like someone touched the brass with one of the electrodes.
If you get it fixed and still plan on lending it to people then I recommend getting a case for the welder.
I'm not lending it to people, we just bought it together 3 people and shared the cost, since we don't need it all the time fulltime
And we have a case 3d-printed, but there are some situation when someone might need to open it to change the battery cables for their specific battery or something like that.
-
Headrc 100 W

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Aug 11 2015 2:09am
Post
by Headrc » Aug 24 2019 10:52pm
I have moved over to the recommended Turnigy nano-tech 5000mah 3S 65~130C Lipo Pack for my Kweld. But I still cannot get good welds for the thicker .3mm nickel. The highest Joule I can get at this time is 62.5 ...after that I get an undercurrent message. Has anyone tried these Turnigy packs in parallel ....essentially doubling capacity and C rate? Thanks, Richard
-
john61ct 100 GW

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Dec 18 2018 2:06pm
Post
by john61ct » Aug 25 2019 12:50am
Doubling capacity halves the C-rate for given current, or doubles current at the same C-rate.
-
Headrc 100 W

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Aug 11 2015 2:09am
Post
by Headrc » Aug 25 2019 9:32am
Ok ...I stated that wrong ...it is about doubling the current that I am interested in. So again has anyone tried this?
-
BVH 1 kW

- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mar 26 2009 10:59am
Post
by BVH » Aug 25 2019 10:49am
Same idea but different battery. I use two, 3S/6000 Panthers and it welds fine. However, I was not able to initially calibrate the Kweld with both batteries run in Parallel due to too much current available. I'd get an error when trying to calibrate. So at the mfg's recommendation, I calibrated using only one of the Panthers and once calibrated, actually weld with both in Parallel.
-
Headrc 100 W

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Aug 11 2015 2:09am
Post
by Headrc » Aug 25 2019 12:08pm
Thanks ...have you found then that your are able to weld thicker nickel strips?
-
BVH 1 kW

- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mar 26 2009 10:59am
Post
by BVH » Aug 25 2019 12:15pm
I've not had the need for .3 strips. Most I've needed is .2.
-
spinningmagnets 100 GW

- Posts: 11826
- Joined: Dec 21 2007 10:27pm
- Location: Ft Riley, NE Kansas
Post
by spinningmagnets » Aug 25 2019 12:26pm
If you need more current from each cell than can be provided from a 0.20mm thick nickel strip, consider adding a copper strip under the nickel, attached to the series connections. The parallel connections never carry high current.

-
tatus1969 1 kW

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mar 17 2017 7:36am
- Location: Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by tatus1969 » Aug 26 2019 7:49am
Headrc wrote: ↑Aug 24 2019 10:52pm
I have moved over to the recommended Turnigy nano-tech 5000mah 3S 65~130C Lipo Pack for my Kweld. But I still cannot get good welds for the thicker .3mm nickel. The highest Joule I can get at this time is 62.5 ...after that I get an undercurrent message. Has anyone tried these Turnigy packs in parallel ....essentially doubling capacity and C rate? Thanks, Richard
With a nanotech 5000mAh you should get at least 1400A of current, and be able to produce pulses of way more than 100J. Please keep the foot pedal down after the OPEN and SHORT calibration steps and post all the info that is displayed. I suspect that either the battery, the welder, or something with your setup is wrong (maybe post a picture that shows everything, also the cables). 0.3mm pure nickel is definitely doable with this setup.
Last edited by
tatus1969 on Aug 26 2019 7:56am, edited 1 time in total.
Resistance is futile - We Are The Watt.
-
tatus1969 1 kW

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mar 17 2017 7:36am
- Location: Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by tatus1969 » Aug 26 2019 7:55am
john61ct wrote: ↑Aug 25 2019 12:50am
Doubling capacity halves the C-rate for given current, or doubles current at the same C-rate.
That's right but doesn't show the full picture. kWeld does basically short circuit the battery when pulsing, and the amount of current is directly given by Ohm's law: voltage stays constant when paralleling two batteries, but their combined internal resistance is half of that of a single one. But still current does not double, as there are more electrical resistances in the loop: cabling, the welder switch and fuse, and also the weld spot itself. Using one nanotech 5000 gives 1400A typical current, and using two in parallel will likely exceed the 2000A current limit of kWeld and is therefore not recommended.
Resistance is futile - We Are The Watt.
-
john61ct 100 GW

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Dec 18 2018 2:06pm
Post
by john61ct » Aug 26 2019 5:29pm
A right size resistor to limit current?
-
eee291 100 kW

- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Nov 05 2015 4:35pm
- Location: Austria, Burgenland
Post
by eee291 » Aug 26 2019 5:38pm
john61ct wrote: ↑Aug 26 2019 5:29pm
A right size resistor to limit current?
Hello no.
-
ossivirt 10 W

- Posts: 92
- Joined: May 18 2016 2:08pm
Post
by ossivirt » Aug 26 2019 11:07pm
john61ct wrote: ↑Aug 26 2019 5:29pm
A right size resistor to limit current?
Longer avg6 batteryleads and or smaller and worse connectors

. Not recomended mut if you keep them under max allowed lenghts if will loose some current..
Edit: meant 8 or higher awg..
Last edited by
ossivirt on Aug 27 2019 5:13am, edited 1 time in total.
-
tatus1969 1 kW

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mar 17 2017 7:36am
- Location: Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by tatus1969 » Aug 27 2019 4:39am
ossivirt wrote: ↑Aug 26 2019 11:07pm
john61ct wrote: ↑Aug 26 2019 5:29pm
A right size resistor to limit current?
Longer avg6 batteryleads and or smaller and worse connectors

. Not recomended mut if you keep them under max allowed lenghts if will loose some current..
Adding resistance in whatever way isn't recommended as it only produces more heat. Adding cable neither, as this adds unhealthy inductance. The only proper way to reduce current (if you don't want to reduce the battery capacity) is to lower the voltage, i.e. use a 2S Lipo instead of 3S.
Resistance is futile - We Are The Watt.
-
flippy 1 MW

- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Aug 12 2015 3:07pm
Post
by flippy » Aug 27 2019 5:35am
john61ct wrote: ↑Aug 26 2019 5:29pm
A right size resistor to limit current?
that would be hillarious to see a regular resistor take 2500 amps without being atomized back into its base elements.

Lithium beats liquid dinosaurs.
-
john61ct 100 GW

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Dec 18 2018 2:06pm
Post
by john61ct » Sep 06 2019 10:01am
So assuming an unlimited amps capacity, but with adjustable current limiting as well as voltage,
what is the ideal input to get maximum safe and effective welding, being conservative about not damaging cells nor reducing their longevity?
-
john61ct 100 GW

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Dec 18 2018 2:06pm
Post
by john61ct » Sep 06 2019 10:19am
flippy wrote:Headrc wrote: ↑Jul 04 2019 1:07pm
HEADWAY 38120 HP 3.2V 8AH LIFEPO4 LITHIUM BATTERIES 25C 200A
..
Boston Power Swing 5300's
those are shit batteries so expect poor results.
That is not my understanding.
I can look past obnoxious tone if the actual expertise is solid, but this flippant comment is a big red flag.
Hmmm, flippant, is that why the flippy handle? or more like "flipping a bird"?
So, do you mean that these decent-quality cells are just not well suited to a particular type of use case?
-
flippy 1 MW

- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Aug 12 2015 3:07pm
Post
by flippy » Sep 06 2019 1:25pm
john61ct wrote: ↑Sep 06 2019 10:19am
That is not my understanding.
I can look past obnoxious tone if the actual expertise is solid, but this flippant comment is a big red flag.
Hmmm, flippant, is that why the flippy handle? or more like "flipping a bird"?
So, do you mean that these decent-quality cells are just not well suited to a particular type of use case?
yes, these cells are not suitable for this, they are light duty at best. they sag, have quality issues and short lifespans by comparison to their price and inconsistent power delivery. and i have tested enough (and had to warranty a couple batteries with headways that ate all my profit margin) to support my claims to never recommend headway-type cells or akwardly sized off-brand cells nobody ever heard of or without testing them to destruction to actually map their performance.
yes, these cells are probably " fine" in a pure DIY setup and to tinker with, but trusting them with your life and the lives of others on public roads is a different matter. there is better -and cheaper- alternatives for that.
i sent you a PM about the personal stuff, it does not belong on this thread.
Lithium beats liquid dinosaurs.
-
john61ct 100 GW

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Dec 18 2018 2:06pm
Post
by john61ct » Sep 06 2019 1:49pm
Fair 'nuff, I could give a shit about feeling myself, not calling you names at all.
But just sticking to the whole point of helping out in a public forum, from a utilitarian / functional POV
just flipping off an unqualified "those batteries suck" without any explanation is the opposite of a constructive contribution.
Especially with two cell types that are actually very high quality
but maybe just don't happen to meet the needs of your particular use case.
Why assume high discharge rates?
What have "public roads" got to do with anything?
Are you saying for use cases where LFP is ideally suited, Headway sucks compared to say K2? Would only last 5000 cycles rather than 7000?
-
frnandu 1 mW

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Jan 24 2019 5:55am
Post
by frnandu » Sep 10 2019 4:05am
tatus1969 wrote: ↑Aug 13 2019 4:37am
frnandu wrote: ↑Aug 12 2019 2:46pm
Is this "REMOVE SHORT" error cause only possible if this diode is somehow damaged (even if it looks ok)?
If so, can it be easily replaced with an ordinary soldering iron?
I need to order from you new electrodes, so if indeed I should replace this diode for stopping the error, maybe you can send me a replacement together with the electrodes?
It is not always easily noticable when these components crack, sometimes the black top only lifts up very slighlty above the large metal tab at the one end. There are other possible reasons for this message, but I now realize that I haven't read your initial post correctly. You say that you had removed and connected the fuse and that it then worked. I somehow had read that you had removed the TVS diode, which is why I gave that warning. This is a completely different situation, and I am thinking about this right now as I haven't had this before... A few questions:
- you actually removed and replaced the fuse while the system was powered from the battery, right?
- are you sure that you have never accidentally touched something on the logic board with one of the electrodes?
- are you sure that you haven't applied external voltage to the electrodes?
- can you once measure the voltage across the electrodes, a) hafter having powering the system, and b) after you have removed+replaced the fuse?
Hi Frank,
For a few weeks the "Remove short" problem somehow went away (didn't do anything, just several times disconnected and connected the battery and it just stopped appearing), but now it again shows up (simply by reconnecting the battery), so I did measure the voltage across the electrodes as you asked.
The voltage is 8.37v (when it shows the "remove short"), and after I disconnect the fuse and reconnect it (the error goes away) it is 8.19v.
Here's a short video showing the error and voltage:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/TQ9F8TB8yWynGr4j6
and pic after reconnected the fuse:

- 20190908_103706.jpg (293.42 KiB) Viewed 1001 times
Can you figure out what might be wrong?
Thanks
-
frnandu 1 mW

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Jan 24 2019 5:55am
Post
by frnandu » Sep 10 2019 4:09am
Let me just add that this is something that since the very begining we (me and another guy you bought the kweld together) have been having, check the very first time in January we posted here about this problem:
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=89039&start=525#p1440919
So, even before we started using the kweld this error was already appearing. But then it went away and we didn't tough anymore about it.
It might be that we somehow made an error while assembly, but we can't figure out what exactly. We tried to follow the assembly manual carefully.
-
tatus1969 1 kW

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mar 17 2017 7:36am
- Location: Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by tatus1969 » Sep 10 2019 5:28am
john61ct wrote: ↑Sep 06 2019 1:49pm
Can you figure out what might be wrong?
The voltage is absolutely okay, and if the welder makes consistent welds as well then I suspect an entirely different problem. Do you have the firmware updater so that I can send you two different firmware images for testing? I'm varying the 'short' detection parameter so that one firmware should always fail, and the other should always pass. If my theory proves true, then there will be an easy fix for this.
Resistance is futile - We Are The Watt.
-
Headrc 100 W

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Aug 11 2015 2:09am
Post
by Headrc » Sep 10 2019 8:50am
I plan to give a more lengthy response at a later date on this ...primarily because I am still experimenting with my battery power for the Kweld. But I can state this ....the battery connections to the Kweld, including the internal ones on the battery itself are absolutely critical. That and the cable length setting will have an impact on whether the battery will prove successful in powering the Kweld. Plugging and unplugging connectors has proven to be a big part of the problem for me ...and it does not matter if they are Anderson,XT's or any other connector. A high power battery disconnect switch is what I am currently experimenting with.
-
john61ct 100 GW

- Posts: 7095
- Joined: Dec 18 2018 2:06pm
Post
by john61ct » Sep 10 2019 9:26am
Blue Sea makes very robust bank isolation switches designed to handle interrupting some darn high currents.