Jasonjm said:
can someone help me here. is the sur ron mx more like a mx bike or more like a mountain bike?
i was all set on buying an alta redshift, then they went out of business.
then i stumbled upon this bike, the sur ron.
but to me it looks more like a mountain bike, with squishy brakes, fork and tires? since i used to downhill MTB the rate at which i used to go through brakepads, tires and forks killed that sport for me, it was more expensive than owning a mx bike. and i hated pedaling.
also this sur ron looks tiny. how big is it? since im 6ft3
I would say it's about half MX / half mountain bike.
The built-in breaks do leave something to be desired - but easy enough to upgrade. I recently installed Shimano Saint breaks and the increased braking power over the stock breaks are awesome.
I was lucky to upgrade to the X Controller with regenerative brakes. Coming down long steep descents I barely have to use my brakes at all - they should last a very long time. Apparently, the X Controllers sold today don't have regen braking, but you can buy the ASI 4000 tuned for the Sur Ron (
see the previous page). It has variable regen braking (unlike my controller) - so should save on brake pads even more.
I have 1,200 miles on mine and my rear tire is looking about ready for a new one. Has about half the tread left on it.
Seems like one of the most popular upgrades is putting a name brand fork on it. I've been happy enough with the stock one that I plan to wear it out before upgrading...