curious said:
Drunkskunk - based on your signature you have both X4 and 9C. Which one in your opinion has lower rolling resistance ?
That would be hard to call. There is so little resistance that its hard to tell.
My Clyte is a dual wound, and for certain the 4012 has more resistance, but the 408 and 9C 9X7 are barely noticeable. Its about like riding 10 pounds low on a 90 pound tire.
Honestly, One could roll half as easily as the other, But I can't tell by feel. The both roll too easily to notice when riding.
I had devised a way to measure cogging torque, sort of. The Coasting test.
Coast down a hill with the motor, and without. The % of time difference will be the % of energy being wasted by cogging forces.
It won't be much.
I've done the test, using my exgirlfriend on her unpowered bike coasting down a 1/4 road to the park. When I'm on an unpowered bike, we coast down and get to the bottom nearly side by side. when I coast down with the motor, i end up about a bike length behind her.
As close as it is, this is something that will need timing traps to check. a stopwatch wouldn't be accurate enough.
The results are also going to be an exponential curve, so it would need to be repeated on several grades of hill and then graphed to mean anything.