Ianhill said:
Whoa there crazy horse 20s with 200% phase u say it would have been ripping rpms if it held together.
I clocked myself at 35mph with a 14inch trials rear wheel and tyre at 13s 12kw it's there straight away front wheel in the air but I find the motor gets up to some decent rpm there must be field weakening on the stock controller but I've not done the math yet to work out how much I'll have to experiment one day run it on a stand off my vesc record it at 1000fps and see what's the true kv of this motor as I'm a bit blind with the stock setup as to what is going on the controller was a $1000 So it must have some goodies in there, when I went to disassemble it had a temp sensor to the heat sink and some potting it would come apart but not easy so I didn't want to destroy it and left it a mystery.
Potting = can't fix your stuff. No thanks! Mobipus controllers are supposedly really good, but they are fully potted which means repairs are impossible and your only choice is to buy another one. In my experience, the #1 thing in a controller to fail is the mosfets and replacing them is cheap and easy. Why would I spend $1000 for a replacement controller when $40-90 worth of mosfets fixes the controller? IMHO, potting is used to guarantee return sales. It does add a small margin of additional reliability, but at the cost of being non-serviceable, it's not worth it.
I know...200% field weakening under load would not result in 200% more RPM's on any motor. I was goofing around. I popped the magnet back into place. It was undamaged...just a few scuff marks on the chrome. I poured super glue in the gaps behind the magnets. After that the magnets would not come loose at 200% FW.
Any kind of SPM motor will present far more RPM's on the bench under zero load with field weakening. Load it just a little and all those extra RPM's will disappear. You really need a lot of exposed iron on the armature for FW to work well. Typical SPM's won't have that while an IPM armature will and as a result will hold power with FW much better. Your motor has a moderate amount of exposed iron, it may benefit a little from FW. The HLD inrunner with max FW, got me 2 more MPH over no FW. On the C80100 outrunner, I got an additional 3 mph. The HLD did better IMHO since it got the extra speed with virtually no change in current draw. The C80100 pulled down 10-20 more amps for it's very small gain.
I've never done it because on an outrunner armature spinning mass needs to remain low, but I considered making some iron blocks to go between the magnets to create more exposed iron in the armature. Who knows, the added mass may not matter that much and maybe the iron would get me a lot more FW benefit.
You may have some FW in there, but I doubt it. There's just not very much exposed iron between the magnets here. The usable RPM gains with FW would be small.
This armature however would provide lots of FW gains.
Do you have a drill you can close it's chuck on the motor shaft? Do you have a laser tacho and a DMM? you have everything you need to find your motors Kv.
1. Use MAX RPM for your drill and just hold it there.
2. Use the laser tacho to determine the RPM of the motor shaft.
3. Connect the DMM to any 2 of the motor phase wires. What's the voltage it reads with the drill maxed out?
Kv=RPM/V
If you then discover that the motor is running faster than it's Kv limit on the controller, it is using FW.
$1000 does not prove anything other than the controller costs a lot if you want to replace it with another provided by Kuberg. It's just an 18 or maybe 24 fet FOC controller. That ought to set you back something like $500-800.