classicalgas
100 W
- Joined
- May 14, 2016
- Messages
- 138
"of one of the biggest active volcanoes on the planet which has 1000 times the destructive potential ?" Define that. Is that like equating rare earth wastes to nuclear fuel rods as "dangerous", like someone did in this thread?
Even if one of Hawwii's volcanoes blew as fully as St Helens did, you'd have a lot of deaths, and square miles of roasted rain forest...but in a decade or two things would be close to normal... not uninhabitable for hundreds of years, like the areas around Fukoshima or Chernoble.
Low co2 emissions does not define "green".
Even if one of Hawwii's volcanoes blew as fully as St Helens did, you'd have a lot of deaths, and square miles of roasted rain forest...but in a decade or two things would be close to normal... not uninhabitable for hundreds of years, like the areas around Fukoshima or Chernoble.
Low co2 emissions does not define "green".