Hillhater said:
What ?.. you agree that there was no significant fossil based CO2 prior to 1850 ??
Oh ?, but, you also think that the 10ppm increase between 1750 and 1850 is not significant ?
With what single graph are you trying to reverse the worldwide consensus?
Hillhater said:
..even though that accounts for 8% of the entire increase in CO2 to date !
But its not just the amount that is significant ,..its the fact that there is clearly a trend of increasing CO2 levels starting before any SIGNIFICANT Fossil based CO2 is present
No it isn't. This is how anyone can tell you don't know anything about science and can't even interpret data in a graph. It's the RATE OF INCREASE. The slope.
Right not the increase in anthropogenic CO2 is 20 times faster than any CO2 has risen AT ANY POINT in history. EVER.
The rate of increase you're talking about from 1750-1850 might have been part of the natural variation, even though it did coincide with humans starting to burn fossil fuels. If that's the point you're trying to make then, yes.
But the current rate, especially in the last few decades is completely, irrefutably, UNNATURAL.
Catering to morons over the last 20 years they've tried to look back even further. Just in case we are in some weird, natural cycle of CO2 increase. There have been periods of extremely high CO2 (determined by proxies, which you have decided in your uneducated fever to reject, except when it supports your narrative. Regardless, I agree with them)
But all of these changes happened over 1000 years, not 100 or 50. Even with the error in levels, the rate of change, which isn't determined by proxies but empirical scientific evidence, isn't.
Even with all of this, the change due to humans isn't 100% certain. It never can be, it's statistically impossible. Right now the likelihood is over 95%.
This is what the science HAS PROVEN. With a 95% certainty, anthropogenic CO2, the stuff from fossil fuels, is responsible for all of the observed changes, consistent with AGW theory.
What don't you get about all of this? It's not overly technical. AGW "theory" as you say is being proven, with tons of science, every single day. It's not being shown false. The certainty has only continued to increase. The only reason they continue to press for evidence is because of the PROPAGANDA you spout. It all comes from ignorant paid shills that know nothing. As you've clearly displayed here, it's completely uneducated disinformation.
It's good to have a cause, but you're fighting for stupid. Take a look around, if you're the smartest person in the room it's time to change rooms. Clearly, it's time for me to change rooms.