bzhwindtalker
100 kW
You may want to check if halls are fine under the debug menus, there are individual hall status.
E-S LMX 64 Bike Owners
- Thread starter Cowardlyduck
- Start date
i already order 3 polychain carbon belt for cheap price in usa 1 guy sel out the belts in his stock need to go away, it is not the same belt then ore friend have (poly chain carbon v is the old generation , i order the newer generation of this carbon belt , lucky to buy for cheap 35 dollar for one beltCowardlyduck said:
.about the stuttering does it happen in flux weakening ?
15T is awsome on my bike i test for the first time with my new setup , it is awsome.
Thanks for all the replies!
Yes the 15T works great and I think it's the best balance between speed/torque.
I will try redoing the auto setup as suggested. I really hope it's not a dead hall. I've replaced them in hub motors before, is it as much of a PITA for these motors or even possible?
Cheers
Yes the 15T works great and I think it's the best balance between speed/torque.
I will try redoing the auto setup as suggested. I really hope it's not a dead hall. I've replaced them in hub motors before, is it as much of a PITA for these motors or even possible?
Cheers
croydon said:i already order 3 polychain carbon belt for cheap price in usa 1 guy sel out the belts in his stock need to go away, it is not the same belt then ore friend have (poly chain carbon v is the old generation , i order the newer generation of this carbon belt , lucky to buy for cheap 35 dollar for one beltCowardlyduck said:
about the stuttering does it happen in flux weakening ?
15T is awsome on my bike i test for the first time with my new setup , it is awsome.
You got belt nice price.. mine was cutted in Italy plus transport so it came expensive.
My belt is new generation also, 25% more load and antistatic (carbon volt). I am confident that this is good belt for this use, but lets see in reality.
Snow and ice is making problems, its stack between belt and sprocket and tensionpulley, then belt flies out from there. Ok its not big suprise but just mentioning
bzhwindtalker
100 kW
Thanks again for the suggestions on re-trying auto-detect on the motor. I tried a few more times and eventually it managed to get it right.
Bit of a worry it takes so many tries, but at least it's working again now.
Cheers
Bit of a worry it takes so many tries, but at least it's working again now.
Cheers
Rix
100 TW
Cowardlyduck said:Thanks again for the suggestions on re-trying auto-detect on the motor. I tried a few more times and eventually it managed to get it right.
Bit of a worry it takes so many tries, but at least it's working again now.
Cheers
I know its like comparing apples to watermelons, but I had to run 3 auto detect cycles on my Adapto to get a combo of settings that allowed the motor to perform really well with out heating things up.
I would say the next best customisable, feature rich controller after Adaptto is the Nucular, so not so dissimilar really...although I could never get my Adaptto's running perfect, in the end close enough was good enough.Rix said:
At least (for now) the Nucular still has active support.
Cheers
scrambler
10 kW
I was having a looks at the latest Valkyrie Boxxbike, 12/14kW, 1600Wh integrated battery, Dual power train but with Motor and pedaling axis aligned with swingarm axis...
Lots of good stuff.
One drawback is the pedal assist is cadence based.
Anyone had a chance to try one and compare with the LMX64?
To LMX, may be time to look into a refresh of the LMX64 frame with a larger integrated battery, possibly in 2 parts modular to offer the flexibility between light weight or high capacity.
Lots of good stuff.
One drawback is the pedal assist is cadence based.
Anyone had a chance to try one and compare with the LMX64?
To LMX, may be time to look into a refresh of the LMX64 frame with a larger integrated battery, possibly in 2 parts modular to offer the flexibility between light weight or high capacity.
scrambler
10 kW
Agreed that it is a slightly different category, more power and therefore a bit more weight, and there is value in both segment.
But some of the technological choices made on the Boxxbike could be welcome in the LMX64, like having a frame that can handle more battery more easily, the concentric drivetrain swing arm axis....
These could be done without compromising the current LMX positioning.
But some of the technological choices made on the Boxxbike could be welcome in the LMX64, like having a frame that can handle more battery more easily, the concentric drivetrain swing arm axis....
These could be done without compromising the current LMX positioning.
Grantmac
10 kW
Lightweight motorcycle with pedals vs powerful ebike.
I actually wouldn't want a concentric drive, especially not shared with the pedals. You lose the ability to control squat.
I actually wouldn't want a concentric drive, especially not shared with the pedals. You lose the ability to control squat.
scrambler
10 kW
Grantmac said:
Can you elaborate on what you lose control over ?
Grantmac
10 kW
A concentric drive won't have any anti-squat behavior during acceleration which reduces traction, especially on rough ground.
bzhwindtalker
100 kW
Yes concentric drive without linkage has terrible pedaling performance.
TorEddy
100 W
Would this also apply if you have a primary reduction from motor to a jackshaft in the swingarm pivot, and a secondary reduction from the jackshaft to the rear wheel? This solution could achieve the same total reduction using larger cogs on both stages. using a primary timing belt and a secondary chain drive would result in less noise and more reduction abilities..
I find it hard to see if this would have the same ani-squat behavior and terrible pedaling performance.
I find it hard to see if this would have the same ani-squat behavior and terrible pedaling performance.
Grantmac
10 kW
In that situation you would have anti squat for the pedals but not the motor. Probably better to run the jack shaft on the left side pedal shaft.
scrambler
10 kW
I think "terrible pedaling performance" is subjective.
There are a lot of talk on the subject, and how important the effect is, really depends on the type of usage and the other parameters of the bike.
I myself know that for my usage, the incidence is minor, and the other benefits outweigh it
There are a lot of talk on the subject, and how important the effect is, really depends on the type of usage and the other parameters of the bike.
I myself know that for my usage, the incidence is minor, and the other benefits outweigh it
For me any more power than the LMX 64 for peddling is redundant.
I like to feel like I am peddling which is why i took the throttle off my bike so its only pedal assist.
I wished that mode 1 had a speed limit of about 35K instead of 28k. I mainly use power level 1 unless i want to fly up a fire road.
I have to use level 3 down hill because of the speed limit cut off. Not because i need the extra power.
I like to feel like I am peddling which is why i took the throttle off my bike so its only pedal assist.
I wished that mode 1 had a speed limit of about 35K instead of 28k. I mainly use power level 1 unless i want to fly up a fire road.
I have to use level 3 down hill because of the speed limit cut off. Not because i need the extra power.
SlowCo
1 MW
Simonten said:
Isn't it possible to program the assist levels like with a Bafang BBS unit? There you can set the speed limits to 100% in all assist levels and have increasing current limits per assist level like this:
