StudEbiker
100 kW
Oppsie daisy........
http://joesacher.com/cycling/motorized-bikee-incident/#more-19
http://joesacher.com/cycling/motorized-bikee-incident/#more-19
On my semi-recumbent CrazyBike2, when I had a chain jam that would certainly have folded up a beam bike like his, it destroyed my rear wheel instead (and the chain itself, pulling it apart)--but it did not destroy the bike frame, because the frame was built to be strong for cargo, and couldn't flex along the line of chain tension like that.neptronix said:All these flexy flimsy recumbent designs scare me. The industry needs to give up on the idea of making these bikes as light as uprights. They need to be as stiff as uprights and that means throwing some extra metal at them, especially on bikes like this where you don't have geometry on your side!
StudEbiker said:I think the bent forks may just be a result of the inevitable crash that happened. I don't think they are actually bent, they are just turned in relation to the handlebars.
recumbent said:StudEbiker said:I think the bent forks may just be a result of the inevitable crash that happened. I don't think they are actually bent, they are just turned in relation to the handlebars.
Then the forks were put on backwards, or the steerer tube assembly was spun 180 deg. they're bent backwards bud. Take a closer look?
edit... the brake calipers seem to be in front like my older bikes were, yet the forks bend back, and the handle bars sideways, quite the puzzle indeed.