DIY Programmable BMS (now using ATtiny/Arduino)

circuit said:
How is this one different from numerous other TL431 based "BMS"?
Click to expand...

The monitoring part of the circuit (the TL431 part) isn't much different, in fact it's very similar to the reference design in TI's datasheet (http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tl431.pdf, figure 24). The PWM portion of the BMS that turns on when balancing starts is the part I haven't seen in other BMSs. I actually build a standalone version of it to test the concept, boards came in yesterday and I got one built up (see attachment). Works beautifully, although my soldering skills leave something to be desired.

I mostly just thought it would be a fun project to do on my own :)

IMG_0827.JPG
 
Phew... all routed. BOM is done.

I'm going to be adding a bunch of thermal vias to improve cooling, but that won't affect size, which is just under 4x6 inches for a 16S BMS.

I'll figure out pricing in the next few days. What is something like this worth to people? I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts.
 
parabellum said:
Good work! Can this board be connected partially, let say 12 of 16 cells and still work normally?
Click to expand...
Yes, the only restriction is that the voltage regulator (TL783) on the PWM portion needs a minimum voltage to function, about 15V or so from the charger. The balancing and HVC/LVC circuits work whether you have 1 or 16 cells hooked up.

The board can be scaled up to 24S easily just by copying the balancing sections, my bike is only 16S though so that's what I started with.
 
cassschr1 said:
Sounds good. Now can you run as 32s or 2 BMS in series, say 28s for life4.
Click to expand...
Yes, that should work fine. The only part of the BMS itself that would possibly be exposed to the full charging voltage would be the voltage regulator, and it's good up to 150V input. I've had your 28S pack in mind since we spoke on the phone.
 
Quick update as there have been a few changes to this project in the last couple of weeks.

1. After figuring out the cost of all the parts + pcb, I decided it would be worthwhile to go with surface mount parts. I know this might be a turn off to some, but they're actually not that bad to work with. I'll post more details on my experience with this as parts come in and I get it built up.

2. Rather than having 1 large "monolithic" board that incorporates all the functions I wanted, I decided to go with multiple smaller PCBs that each take care of a specific function. There are 4 cell "modules" that take care of the individual cell balancing, as well as the LVC/HVC signal. These are just under 2"x2", and stack together to monitor any multiple of 4 cells. I've ordered the boards for the 4 cell balancing modules, and am working on the charge controlling module now.
 
hillyterrain said:
I'm interested for in this, using 12s LiPo
Click to expand...
What voltage do you want for the HVC/LVC? I'm on the conservative side so I set mine to 3.6V for balancing and 2.5V LVC (LiFePO4).

HVC is just 2 resistor value changes. LVC is set by a voltage supervisor chip, they come in a range of options.
 
I'm interested too

building multiple 24s packs with laptop cells, will go to 28s instead if I can :)

(wanted 28s but couldn't find bms)
 
knighty said:
I'm interested too

building multiple 24s packs with laptop cells, will go to 28s instead if I can :)

(wanted 28s but couldn't find bms)
Click to expand...

That was part of my frustration with current models, I'm running a 16S pack right now but wanted the option to add more cells without buying a whole new BMS and rebuilding everything. Each 4 cell board is isolated from the rest, so to go from 24-28 cells you would just need to add another 4 cell board.

Just out of curiosity, what are you using right now for a BMS?
 
dmwahl said:
That was part of my frustration with current models, I'm running a 16S pack right now but wanted the option to add more cells without buying a whole new BMS and rebuilding everything. Each 4 cell board is isolated from the rest, so to go from 24-28 cells you would just need to add another 4 cell board.

Just out of curiosity, what are you using right now for a BMS?
Click to expand...


I've got a bms 24c lifepo4 headway 10ah/72v pack from bmsbattery with there bms on it

I'm building range extender packs with laptop cells to a higher voltage, then I'm going to use an ardrino to control charging from the laptop (1c) cells to the headway cells (10c)


plan is I can go out on the bike and take spare laptop packs with me, then when one laptop pack runs empty I can just ride back to my van and swap it for another laptop pack and keep going all day long :)
 
dmwahl said:
hillyterrain said:
I'm interested for in this, using 12s LiPo
Click to expand...
What voltage do you want for the HVC/LVC? I'm on the conservative side so I set mine to 3.6V for balancing and 2.5V LVC (LiFePO4).

HVC is just 2 resistor value changes. LVC is set by a voltage supervisor chip, they come in a range of options.
Click to expand...

I'd like to be on the safe side, for LiPo would that be 3.7 or even 3.75V?
 
dose this bms include an over current protection during discharge
 
i think it would be best as an option. i like the idea of not having it for lipo and having it for lifepo4
 
dmwahl said:
Not at the moment, ...
Click to expand...
Please keep it that way if you can. Why add complexity and inefficiency when there's absolutely no need for it. Every ebike controller already has current limit. The cycle analyst also has that capability.

To be honest, the only feature I'm interested in is the cell LVC. So it would be great if LVC is a separate "module". Of course the actual LVC threshold must be "programmable" (dip switches or jumpers would be fine) because an LVC could be reasonable to one person and crazy to another's.
 
dmwahl said:
that won't affect size, which is just under 4x6 inches for a 16S BMS.
Click to expand...

Make the board 100x150mm (or a tad smaller) and SeeedStudio can make them fairly quickly for a rather good price. Their prices are based upon the board outline fitting within various rectangles.
 
subscribed!


Tommy L sends..... Nice work here! ..........
mosh.gif
 
malcav said:
i think it would be best as an option. i like the idea of not having it for lipo and having it for lifepo4
Click to expand...

That's exactly why I wanted to go the module route. If you want it you can add a module, otherwise you can leave it out. As SamTexas pointed out, it will only add complexity. That said, if there is enough interest I can put one together, and it can be added on for those who want it.
 
SamTexas said:
dmwahl said:
Not at the moment, ...
Click to expand...
To be honest, the only feature I'm interested in is the cell LVC. So it would be great if LVC is a separate "module". Of course the actual LVC threshold must be "programmable" (dip switches or jumpers would be fine) because an LVC could be reasonable to one person and crazy to another's.
Click to expand...
Right now the LVC is set using a voltage monitor IC, specifically the NCP301 series. I did a quick digikey search and found 2.0V, 2.2V, and 2.5V options in stock right now. They're produced in 0.1V increments, so other suppliers are likely to have other options. It's also pin equivalent to the NCP303 which is a newer version of the chip and has similar thresholds. The other parts could just be left off, or I could spin a standalone LVC board if necessary.

Curious... why only LVC and no balancing?
 
texaspyro said:
dmwahl said:
that won't affect size, which is just under 4x6 inches for a 16S BMS.
Click to expand...

Make the board 100x150mm (or a tad smaller) and SeeedStudio can make them fairly quickly for a rather good price. Their prices are based upon the board outline fitting within various rectangles.
Click to expand...
I've been using OSH Park so far and been quite happy with them, I'll check out SeeedStudio though. Thanks for the tip.
 
dmwahl said:
SamTexas said:
dmwahl said:
Not at the moment, ...
Click to expand...
To be honest, the only feature I'm interested in is the cell LVC. So it would be great if LVC is a separate "module". Of course the actual LVC threshold must be "programmable" (dip switches or jumpers would be fine) because an LVC could be reasonable to one person and crazy to another's.
Click to expand...
Right now the LVC is set using a voltage monitor IC, specifically the NCP301 series. I did a quick digikey search and found 2.0V, 2.2V, and 2.5V options in stock right now. They're produced in 0.1V increments, so other suppliers are likely to have other options. It's also pin equivalent to the NCP303 which is a newer version of the chip and has similar thresholds. The other parts could just be left off, or I could spin a standalone LVC board if necessary.

Curious... why only LVC and no balancing?
Click to expand...
Sorry, I should have explained why when I said that. Balancing is already readily available with RC chargers or with a separate balancer.

The 2.0V, 2.2 and 2.5V LVC threshold you listed is definitely too low for LiCo. 2.5V is fine with me for consumer LiCo, but most people are more comfortable with 3.0V.
 
SamTexas said:
dmwahl said:
SamTexas said:
To be honest, the only feature I'm interested in is the cell LVC. So it would be great if LVC is a separate "module". Of course the actual LVC threshold must be "programmable" (dip switches or jumpers would be fine) because an LVC could be reasonable to one person and crazy to another's.
Click to expand...
Right now the LVC is set using a voltage monitor IC, specifically the NCP301 series. I did a quick digikey search and found 2.0V, 2.2V, and 2.5V options in stock right now. They're produced in 0.1V increments, so other suppliers are likely to have other options. It's also pin equivalent to the NCP303 which is a newer version of the chip and has similar thresholds. The other parts could just be left off, or I could spin a standalone LVC board if necessary.

Curious... why only LVC and no balancing?
Click to expand...
Sorry, I should have explained why when I said that. Balancing is already readily available with RC chargers or with a separate balancer.

The 2.0V, 2.2 and 2.5V LVC threshold you listed is definitely too low for LiCo. 2.5V is fine with me for consumer LiCo, but most people are more comfortable with 3.0V.
Click to expand...

Got it, I wasn't sure what chemistry you were using. The chip I used for LVC comes in 0.1V increments from 0.9V up to 4.9V. Mouser has 3.0V, 3.1V, and 3.2V versions in stock (as well as others). The only reason I didn't use them for the HVC cutoff was the tolerance and hysteresis range is larger than I wanted for balancing.

How many cells do you want to have LVC for?
 
I also use LiFePO4. But right now my most pressing need is a cell level LVC for a 3s and a 7s consumer LiCo packs. I would love to have a 3.0V LVC, but 2.50V would also do.

I don't know how you plan to notify the user when LVC is reached. I prefer to have a single continuous signal, say going from 0V to 5V for example when any of the 3 (or 7) cells is at or below the LVC. I don't need to know which cell it is. Just my thought.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

fizzit
    • Doin' Science
Simple cutoff circuit for using a CC/CV supply as a charger
Replies
3
Views
195
amberwolf
amberwolf
whatever
Self balancing charger idea: diy using tp4056
Replies
7
Views
776
whatever
whatever
F
5S 20A BMS boards for Makita batteries clones. Worth installing?
Replies
0
Views
385
Firedog
F
geoff57
DIY bms
Replies
2
Views
342
geoff57
geoff57
hyperknot
First DIY pack for heated gloves
Replies
4
Views
658
amberwolf
amberwolf
Back
Top