Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Solar, wind, hydro and other non-fossil sources of electricity.
Joseph C.   1 MW

1 MW
Posts: 1797
Joined: Feb 03 2011 8:43am
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Joseph C. » Feb 13 2014 5:48pm

Funny Looking Tower Generates 600% More Electrical Energy Than Traditional Wind Turbines

The Sheerwind wind turbine promises to produce 6 times the electrical power than traditional wind turbines.
This funny looking wind tower acts like a funnel, directing the wind from any angle, down through a tube to a ground based turbine generator. The funneling of the wind through a narrow passage effectively creates a “jet effect” increasing the velocity of the wind, while lowering the pressure. This is called the Venturi Effect. This speeds up the wind turbine mounted inside the narrowest portion and generates electricity.
As such it can capture and generate electricity at a much lower wind speed than current wind power technologies.
The idea is so simple, so elegant, and promises to produce so much more energy at lower cost and more efficiently, that it might just be the answer to many problems with current wind turbine technology. Aside from the lower capital investment to get started, and increased efficiency and power generation, it also might be a solution to the ever growing problem of birds (and bats) being killed by traditional wind farms. (Yes, that is a problem)
This technology is not really new in the science of fluid dynamics, however this is a new way to generate electricity, and if successful, promises to grow the wind energy in a more eco-friendly way than ever thought possible.
Imagine a smaller HOME version on your off grid cabin. Now THAT is cool off grid tech!

http://www.offgridworld.com/funny-looki ... -turbines/



Yellow Magpie - Home Of The Talented And The Interesting

http://yellowmagpie.com

Kris B Krunch   100 mW

100 mW
Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 18 2011 12:55am
Location: Mission, BC CANADA

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Kris B Krunch » Feb 20 2014 1:00am

Wow, that's really interesting.

User avatar
liveforphysics   100 GW

100 GW
Posts: 13914
Joined: Oct 29 2008 1:48am
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, USA

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by liveforphysics » Feb 20 2014 1:47am

It seems like in a brisk wind it would be much worse than a conventional 3 blade prop.

Interesting concept.
Each carcinogen vapor exposure includes a dice roll for cancer.

Each mutagen vapor exposure includes a dice roll for reproductive genetic defects in your children.

Each engine start sprays them into a shared atmosphere which includes beings not offered an opportunity to consent accepting these cancer experiences and defective genetics life experiences.

Every post is a free gift to the collective of minds composing the living bleeding edge of LEV development on our spaceship.

Punx0r   10 GW

10 GW
Posts: 4747
Joined: May 03 2012 8:16am
Location: England

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Punx0r » Mar 13 2014 8:22am

It does seem like it'd be more efficient to just design a wind turbine that works at 10mph?

Unless there's some overall advantage to using a high velocity turbine.

User avatar
Drunkskunk   100 GW

100 GW
Posts: 6977
Joined: Apr 14 2007 11:37am
Location: Dallas, Texas. U.S.A.

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Drunkskunk » Mar 15 2014 4:53pm

I wonder how much energey is being lost in capturing, changing direction, and compressing the air to achieve the higher velocity?

Seems like it would be a lot more efficent to just build a low speed wind power generator.



Slightly off topic, looking for a good example of a non turbine low speed wind generator I found this:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... nd/4224763
Buy the ticket, take the ride.
Monster Bike:http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewto ... =6&t=38667

User avatar
electrodacus   10 mW

10 mW
Posts: 28
Joined: Mar 27 2014 12:29pm
Contact:

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by electrodacus » Mar 27 2014 10:07pm

:)

You can know from the title is just not possible.
First a traditional vertical wind turbine will get over 40% efficiency and that is really close to the max theoretical efficiency Benz limit of 59%
So not even 2x is possible.
Then this turbine will be way less cost effective maybe by a factor of 6x :) and that is more important than the actual efficiency.
I just hope no one got scammed in investing in this design except for the initial designer :)
http://electrodacus.com/
Open Source Solar BMS
Image

User avatar
Dauntless   100 GW

100 GW
Posts: 6689
Joined: May 29 2010 1:49am
Location: Coordinates: 33°52′48″N 117°55′43″W

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Dauntless » Mar 28 2014 12:12am

Not so fast. You're only referring to running in optimal conditions. This thing claims to generate electricity at barely a breeze conditions when the regular bladed turbine will be doing NOTHING. The OC in Southern California usually isn't still, but good solid winds to run the normal turbine aren't so common. This thing may go beyond 6X compared to the normal turbine if it was here. I'd have to learn more to say that for sure.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM MAGIC!
- Arthur C. Clarke

User avatar
spinningmagnets   100 GW

100 GW
Posts: 10595
Joined: Dec 21 2007 10:27pm
Location: Ft Riley, NE Kansas

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by spinningmagnets » Mar 28 2014 6:18am

After quite a bit of study over at otherpower.com, I was dismayed to find out that a lot of wind "goes around" a turbine when the generator gets loaded and a low battery it is charging puts up some resistance to the blades turning.

View the turbine at the bottom of this funnel as a restriction:...sure...it spins, but it is not free-flowing. Even with a low-speed wind being "captured" by the clever Omni-directional funnel-structure, it will build up some pressure in front of the turbine, and some of the wind will go around the funnel inlets.

User avatar
friendly1uk   10 MW

10 MW
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mar 14 2013 1:18pm
Location: The not so UK

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by friendly1uk » Mar 28 2014 6:38am

Is there any point speeding up the wind if it gets proportionally thinner. I guess so at 2mph. At normal speeds this is looking a little wasteful.

Wish I had time to study it further. I'm off wind power though. I think we are going to cover the globe then realise the days are getting longer and we are changing orbit. What other result could there be.

Wind generation seems to be the generating boards answer, but I see better value from solar. It captures solar energy that would otherwise heat the planet further. Solar seems like the cure, and wind a problem. I don't really know what solar collects though. I just imagine it's an energetic particle so will warm us further
bmsbattery sent me broken and incorrect stuff, and won't even talk to me about it.

doctorGONZO   100 W

100 W
Posts: 200
Joined: Sep 16 2012 12:46am
Location: central USA

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by doctorGONZO » Mar 29 2014 3:25am

Drunkskunk wrote:I wonder how much energey is being lost in capturing, changing direction, and compressing the air to achieve the higher velocity?

Seems like it would be a lot more efficent to just build a low speed wind power generator.



Slightly off topic, looking for a good example of a non turbine low speed wind generator I found this:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... nd/4224763

Kinetic energy is calculated on the basis of the mass of the moving body times the velocity SQUARED of the body. Someone harvesting wind energy finds much more energy in faster air.

Ek = 1/2 mv^2

The structural wind load required by the local building department for the turbine and its tower will be based on a tornado like wind. Therefore the expense will be based on the turbine being in a strong wind. It would be extremely cost inefficient to plan to harvest 2 MPH wind after you have paid for a structure and a generator that must survive a 100 MPH or faster wind.

Any kind of guide that captures the wind and redirects it must cause friction that takes energy away. So any kind of a curvy swervy thingy will apply LESS WIND KINETIC ENERGY to the generator itself than if the generator was up out in the open air and large enough to engage the amount of energy wanted.

doctorGONZO   100 W

100 W
Posts: 200
Joined: Sep 16 2012 12:46am
Location: central USA

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by doctorGONZO » Mar 29 2014 3:37am

spinningmagnets wrote:After quite a bit of study over at otherpower.com, I was dismayed to find out that a lot of wind "goes around" a turbine when the generator gets loaded and a low battery it is charging puts up some resistance to the blades turning.

View the turbine at the bottom of this funnel as a restriction:...sure...it spins, but it is not free-flowing. Even with a low-speed wind being "captured" by the clever Omni-directional funnel-structure, it will build up some pressure in front of the turbine, and some of the wind will go around the funnel inlets.

"Regular" windmill generators that have a tail fin and are mounted on a swivel bearing turn round to always be facing the wind. It is old well established technology. Back in the 1930s most farms had such a windmill generator before the Federal Government provided centrally generated powerline electricity to rural areas.
Last edited by doctorGONZO on Mar 29 2014 4:01am, edited 1 time in total.

doctorGONZO   100 W

100 W
Posts: 200
Joined: Sep 16 2012 12:46am
Location: central USA

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by doctorGONZO » Mar 29 2014 3:49am

Dauntless wrote:Not so fast. You're only referring to running in optimal conditions. This thing claims to generate electricity at barely a breeze conditions when the regular bladed turbine will be doing NOTHING. The OC in Southern California usually isn't still, but good solid winds to run the normal turbine aren't so common. This thing may go beyond 6X compared to the normal turbine if it was here. I'd have to learn more to say that for sure.

Thats a good point. In a neighborhood where the wind is almost always 2 MPH or slower, some kind of a big curvy wind catcher might actually do better than a "regular" windmill even if the regular one is especially designed for the extra-slow wind. BUT you are going to get a really small amount of energy out of a 2 MPH wind. Because a 2 MPH wind only contains a really small amount of kinetic energy. You will pay big bucks for the generator and the big wind catcher and get only enough power to light one LED. Or maybe two if it is your lucky day.

User avatar
molybdenum   100 W

100 W
Posts: 299
Joined: Feb 20 2014 11:09am
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by molybdenum » Mar 29 2014 11:54am

For sure, this wouldn't be as efficient as a traditional turbine in higher winds. Building a turbine to work in 2-10mph winds would require a very lightweight design with large surface area blades which would be prone to damage in storms. For those areas where higher wind speeds are rare, this concept (if it works) would be of benefit. Anyways, I can see some advantages to this design in spite of energy losses concentrating the wind:

- Potentially a more attractive design than big propellers. Who wants to see big props everywhere.
- Could be built on a smaller scale and incorporated into the rooftops of houses, which tend to accelerate winds over their sloped roof apexes.
- noise control?. Large turbines tend to be noisy. noise would be concentrated near the outlet lower to the ground. Noise is one of the most frequent complaints from those living near large wind turbines.
- Install mesh for a bird friendly design.
- stackable?

my $0.02
2012 Kona Dew Deluxe, Q128C and 9spd cassette, S12S sinewave controller, 48V Panasonic battery

Punx0r   10 GW

10 GW
Posts: 4747
Joined: May 03 2012 8:16am
Location: England

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Punx0r » Mar 30 2014 1:36pm

friendly1uk wrote:Is there any point speeding up the wind if it gets proportionally thinner. I guess so at 2mph. At normal speeds this is looking a little wasteful.

Wish I had time to study it further. I'm off wind power though. I think we are going to cover the globe then realise the days are getting longer and we are changing orbit. What other result could there be.

Wind generation seems to be the generating boards answer, but I see better value from solar. It captures solar energy that would otherwise heat the planet further. Solar seems like the cure, and wind a problem. I don't really know what solar collects though. I just imagine it's an energetic particle so will warm us further
index.jpg
index.jpg (8.21 KiB) Viewed 2770 times

User avatar
veloman   1 GW

1 GW
Posts: 3037
Joined: Sep 14 2009 1:06am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by veloman » Apr 01 2014 11:38pm

Does a tree disipate wind energy? Yes. Energy is used up as friction on the leaves, etc. So you can have millions of wind turbines and its no different than some other obstacle like a mtn, building, cow in the field.
40" mower for sale! viewtopic.php?f=9&t=95387
Mush! Mush you electrons! Push harder!

User avatar
friendly1uk   10 MW

10 MW
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mar 14 2013 1:18pm
Location: The not so UK

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by friendly1uk » Apr 03 2014 4:59pm

Punx0r wrote:
friendly1uk wrote:Is there any point speeding up the wind if it gets proportionally thinner. I guess so at 2mph. At normal speeds this is looking a little wasteful.

Wish I had time to study it further. I'm off wind power though. I think we are going to cover the globe then realise the days are getting longer and we are changing orbit. What other result could there be.

Wind generation seems to be the generating boards answer, but I see better value from solar. It captures solar energy that would otherwise heat the planet further. Solar seems like the cure, and wind a problem. I don't really know what solar collects though. I just imagine it's an energetic particle so will warm us further
index.jpg
Not at all. I'm sure I said I'm just disinterested. I only saw the pic briefly and replied to a comment I still don't see. Not because I'm daft, I can tell you that eventually along your way of thinking (presuming you understand) that your air will go so fast, and carry so much energy, that it won't turn the turbine at all. But it is just physics for physicians. Here it seems that saying the wind looses mass is rather wrong, which is my statement. We have infact made denser air at a higher speed, not air with a lower mass. Although it is air with a lower mass on a molecular level. It's just a funnel isn't it?

I didn't bother with physics at school, which was nowhere near this level. Getting a few things wrong does not make me 'blown away' at all. That is the feeling when women leave me. I mean...why... I'm seriously blown away by that lol. Did I get anything wrong though? I guess your not going to know. I won't insult you though. Just no need for it... You can have a different viewpoint that was handed to you if you wish. I very much doubt you can engage me in anything of interest here. Just post pics, perhaps trying to level up? I notice elsewhere your spell checking me lol

Nothing blows me away except loss. Anything else I can master. I do get things wrong though, we all do.



Cows are in a very different air stream. These things are tall to get into the air unaffected by ground turbulence. It is virgin territory. The cows air is already turning with the planet, iirc it's called ground air, and the tall turbines extend this layer higher.
bmsbattery sent me broken and incorrect stuff, and won't even talk to me about it.

Punx0r   10 GW

10 GW
Posts: 4747
Joined: May 03 2012 8:16am
Location: England

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Punx0r » Apr 04 2014 5:00am

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that your mind was "blown". It was my mind that was "blown" by reading your post. I made several attempts at typing a reply but just couldn't quite capture my reaction in words.

I had only just managed to piece my mind back together when I read your last post and you re-blew it. Dangit!

Punx0r   10 GW

10 GW
Posts: 4747
Joined: May 03 2012 8:16am
Location: England

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Punx0r » Apr 04 2014 5:08am

Right, I'm off to the Doctors to brush on Bernoulli's Principle :)

User avatar
Dauntless   100 GW

100 GW
Posts: 6689
Joined: May 29 2010 1:49am
Location: Coordinates: 33°52′48″N 117°55′43″W

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Dauntless » Apr 04 2014 9:48pm

Bernoulli didn't learn it at the doctor, he learned it in the sewer. What a thing to be staring at in fascination.

Just to be 'Divergent,' maybe you could post some haunting picture. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/0 ... 85953.html
Any sufficiently advanced technology is INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM MAGIC!
- Arthur C. Clarke

User avatar
BiGH   100 kW

100 kW
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mar 29 2007 1:58am
Location: CBD - Melbourne

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by BiGH » Apr 28 2014 7:39pm

Couple of thoughts when looking at this. it seems like there should be a bit of a lip going into the turbine. - if air was moving fast enough wouldn't this direct more into the turbine itself vs going around the edges?

Also mounting a Vertical axis wind turbine (or prop one) on top of the structure may be a good idea

and why not have the exhaust air directed back to the input would need to see if this caused a negative or positive effect or not.

another idea would be to use variable geometry blades to manage backpressure/efficiency.

anyways that's my thoughts while sitting at work doing other things.

please excuse the crude drawing.
Attachments
Wind Channeller.png
Wind Channeller.png (20.27 KiB) Viewed 879 times
Bike / Motor: Electric specalized rock hopper with Crystalyte 504 / 26"
Batt: Yesa 72v (36v*2) (getting 6.7ah) LiFEPO4 in a Topeak bag. OR 1x eMTB 48v 20ah pack (straps to frame) -depending on range requirements.
Controller: Unmodified 48a digital with 4110 Fets
Current Prob: Bike is in parts getting painted / drying / testing replacement BMS
Trail of Dead Parts:Avanti Frame, 408 motor *melted*, 35a controller - i broke by trying to mod it 2nd controller - blew it up.
My Ride

User avatar
BiGH   100 kW

100 kW
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mar 29 2007 1:58am
Location: CBD - Melbourne

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by BiGH » Apr 28 2014 7:40pm

oh and if using a VAWT put solar panels on top of that :P

Green energy stack!
Bike / Motor: Electric specalized rock hopper with Crystalyte 504 / 26"
Batt: Yesa 72v (36v*2) (getting 6.7ah) LiFEPO4 in a Topeak bag. OR 1x eMTB 48v 20ah pack (straps to frame) -depending on range requirements.
Controller: Unmodified 48a digital with 4110 Fets
Current Prob: Bike is in parts getting painted / drying / testing replacement BMS
Trail of Dead Parts:Avanti Frame, 408 motor *melted*, 35a controller - i broke by trying to mod it 2nd controller - blew it up.
My Ride

User avatar
LockH   100 GW

100 GW
Posts: 17453
Joined: Jul 09 2013 11:06pm
Location: Ummm.. Started out in Victoria BC Canada, then started to move around... Oh oh.

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by LockH » Apr 28 2014 9:04pm

Ermmm... Right now, ten hits on ES for the word "savonius".

Just a thought.
L
ES changed my life (for the waaaaay better).

Eff. June, 2014 Phoenix Ebike Promotions

(Current ride? High speed lawn chair.)
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57408

Phoenix Ebike Promotions conversion kit (work in progress. More drink holders, etc etc)
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=60564

Joined yer local chapter of EA yet?
(Ebikers Anonymous - Where we're all miserable failures, but the parties are hilarious...)

User avatar
Samd   1.21 GW

1.21 GW
Posts: 3641
Joined: Jun 28 2011 11:08pm
Location: Ballarat, AU
Contact:

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by Samd » Apr 29 2014 1:45am

Betz limit says a physical wind turbine is about 50% efficient. Add an alternator at say 70% efficient means an overall efficiency of about 0.5*0.7=35%. Give or take that's about what we get when we build them.

Six times more efficient than 35%?
mmm, ~200% efficiency - take all the time you need....
But I call bullshit.
http://ballaratebikes.com/

ImageImageImage
"Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing that a 165mm rear shock can't deliver 220mm of rear swingarm travel." - Oprah Winfrey.

User avatar
LockH   100 GW

100 GW
Posts: 17453
Joined: Jul 09 2013 11:06pm
Location: Ummm.. Started out in Victoria BC Canada, then started to move around... Oh oh.

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by LockH » Jun 11 2018 12:03pm

Hehe... How to suck "free" energy from large, fast moving vehicles...

Enlil Vertical Axis Wind Turbine


:wink:
ES changed my life (for the waaaaay better).

Eff. June, 2014 Phoenix Ebike Promotions

(Current ride? High speed lawn chair.)
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57408

Phoenix Ebike Promotions conversion kit (work in progress. More drink holders, etc etc)
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=60564

Joined yer local chapter of EA yet?
(Ebikers Anonymous - Where we're all miserable failures, but the parties are hilarious...)

craneplaneguy   10 kW

10 kW
Posts: 746
Joined: Nov 27 2015 9:15am
Location: S.E. Idaho USA

Re: Windturbine: 6X More Efficient and Much Cheaper

Post by craneplaneguy » Jun 19 2018 8:06am

Bogus click bait, like an electric car startup claiming "1000 mile range, 15 minutes recharge rate, 200 mph top speed"! This is an old scheme I've seen before, and it was BS then also.

Post Reply