APL
100 kW
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2018
- Messages
- 1,113
edit: this thread has been split-off from the "Appel Electric Cruiser" thread, which can be found here: https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=95745
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Chalo,.. and it's good to know about the 7075-7050 series aluminum. Sounds like the right stuff!
It looks like we've got options for the axle ends, the proof is in the pudd'n, as they say. I'll just have to give one a try and see what gives.
Amber ironed out the wire route, and we've dialed in the axle size. So I think it's time to move on to an even more complicated mess.
The simple bar magnets are a loose end,.. in the fact that I haven't actually wound one to see how much room it will take up. :?
I chose this design because of the simplicity to remove, rewind an expand the size. The motor is made with experimenting in
mind, and a low tech approach.
How many strands, winds and wire size is up to you and me. As well as the 3 phase wiring configuration.
I thought I'd start out with about the same wire mass as the motor I have now, same size and winds.
The Crystalyte has 51 poles, and this has 48, so only 3 poles short. Although, they are positioned much more closer to the axle.
I imagine this will result in more speed, and less torque. (Comparatively)
As long as I can get 750 watts out of it, I'm good.
And I imagine that has to do more with with wire size, and heat, and how much current you can pump in to it.
The amount of steel in the bar is relatively the same as the two sides of a standard hub motor,..or, the U shape straightened out.
So it will have the same amount of wire on the bar as both sides of the U shape Crystalyte core.
However, the wire can be wrapped more closely for a tighter copper mass density.
I know I'm going to get beat up on this,..but does anyone see any red flags here? Any thoughts?
Keep in mind that cogging is not really an issue here, because it's a mid drive, and the rear wheel coasts, plus, the air gap is
adjustable, so you can dial in whatever you want.
View attachment 1

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Chalo,.. and it's good to know about the 7075-7050 series aluminum. Sounds like the right stuff!
It looks like we've got options for the axle ends, the proof is in the pudd'n, as they say. I'll just have to give one a try and see what gives.
Amber ironed out the wire route, and we've dialed in the axle size. So I think it's time to move on to an even more complicated mess.
The simple bar magnets are a loose end,.. in the fact that I haven't actually wound one to see how much room it will take up. :?
I chose this design because of the simplicity to remove, rewind an expand the size. The motor is made with experimenting in
mind, and a low tech approach.
How many strands, winds and wire size is up to you and me. As well as the 3 phase wiring configuration.
I thought I'd start out with about the same wire mass as the motor I have now, same size and winds.
The Crystalyte has 51 poles, and this has 48, so only 3 poles short. Although, they are positioned much more closer to the axle.
I imagine this will result in more speed, and less torque. (Comparatively)
As long as I can get 750 watts out of it, I'm good.
And I imagine that has to do more with with wire size, and heat, and how much current you can pump in to it.
The amount of steel in the bar is relatively the same as the two sides of a standard hub motor,..or, the U shape straightened out.
So it will have the same amount of wire on the bar as both sides of the U shape Crystalyte core.
However, the wire can be wrapped more closely for a tighter copper mass density.
I know I'm going to get beat up on this,..but does anyone see any red flags here? Any thoughts?
Keep in mind that cogging is not really an issue here, because it's a mid drive, and the rear wheel coasts, plus, the air gap is
adjustable, so you can dial in whatever you want.
View attachment 1
