gromike
10 kW
How does one capacity test hundreds of cells?
How does one capacity test hundreds of cells?
...and to test and track capacity of entire packs I use one of these.How does one capacity test hundreds of cells?
I use the aliexpress atorch version at 1/2 the price. The glowing circle is a CPU cooling fan, The system can only dissipate 160 watts, so the max draw on a 48V pack is around 3 amps. That's a 3AH discharge rate, so it only takes 3-5 hours to rate battery capacity,...and to test and track capacity of entire packs I use one of these.

I use the aliexpress atorch version at 1/2 the price.
Is this the one to get? https://www.aliexpress.us/item/2255...JoZGQ4D4&utparam-url=scene:search|query_from:Exactly the one I have. I run a complete discharge with it on each pack at the end of each season and record the results so I can watch how each pack does over time. I run the same cells but by Panasonic (NCR18650GA) in 11p.
Yes and yes. That's the one and tests from single cells up to the largest ebike battery pack. I also use it to test the 100ahSays 2 to 200V. Does that mean you can load test any battery between 2 to 200V?
Adaptek Essential 24 Pouch
Made with a paraffin blend. Pouches solidify when temperature drops below 75 degrees and liquify as temps rise above 75 degrees. Optimal operatiing range is 71-79 degrees.
Phase change material used with insulated containers for shipping in cold or hot environments.
Phase 24 keeps product about 75 degrees during shipment in hot or cold environments. This phase change material is ideally suited for the shipment of blood products, tissues, pharmaceuticals, live animals and plants that must remain in the 20°C to 30°C range.
These packs have been made with a heavy duty outter packaging to prevent leaks.
Use with a heat pack or cold pack to keep temps stable for longer periods of time. Reusable!
There is nothing magic about this pack it just helps with absorbing heat or cold depeneding on how you use it. You still should use heat and cold packs and check weather conditions before you ship.
The packs measure 4.5" x 4.5" x 1" and weighs 170 grams.
Phase 24
- Most used for applications that need to maintain a controlled room temperature
- Phase change temperature is 24°C
- Provides thermal protection when shipping products between 15-30°C
- When used as liquid, keeps contents warm
- When used as solid, protects contents from heat
:lol: Yeah, but it's ignition temperature is far above anything the battery will experience (even in our desert weather).paraffin blend
You mean that stuff that ignites and burns when it becomes hot?

If you install heat and/or smoke sensors at the battery location, you can create a mechanism to engage the fire extinguisher. You'd need to ensure it is setup so that it's output covers the fire properly; it might take more than one to do it from different directions like you could if you were there.Of course you need to be at home to use it...
hct-world.com
F-500 EA® is not a traditional firefighting foam, it’s a next-generation encapsulator agent engineered to mitigate fires at the molecular level. While foams work mechanically to smother flammable liquids, F-500 EA® modifies the structure of water droplets by introducing spherical micelles that encapsulate fuels and interrupt the fire’s chemical chain reaction.
Unlike conventional dry chemical extinguishers that rely on agents like ammonium phosphate or potassium bicarbonate to disrupt one element of the fire tetrahedron, F-500 EA® targets all four legs simultaneously, heat, fuel, oxygen, and the chemical reaction, delivering unmatched suppression power across multiple hazard classes.
Stupidest thing to do is generate publicity as that just generates unwarranted fear. In the real world all that matters is that the odds are really low, like air travel, where the odds of crashing & being killed are less than 1% or something. So AFAIC as long as the odds of these fires happening are less than 1% there’s really nothing to talk about here & we can get back to discussing real estate prices or tips on the horses at Randwick tomorrow. IOW rational people don’t have anything to worry about here - now if you’re an ignorant fuker who’s paranoid & thinks vaping’s worse than smoking, then you’ll probably worry.One conclusion is going to rattle the regulators. Don't blame the users..... "It's all about the cells, dummy!"
I knew UL testing was expensive, having worked with them 40 years ago, but Justin said $40K to test one model and he sells 13 models,making it pretty costly to get that label,
1%!? That’s a huge percentage. (Dying in a plane is definitely way less than that at about 0.00001%).as long as the odds of these fires happening are less than 1% there’s really nothing to talk about here
AFAIC, anything less than 1% is ok. Fact is life isn’t meant to be safe - if life was safe humans would never had existed in the 1st place.1%!? That’s a huge percentage. (Dying in a plane is definitely way less than that at about 0.00001%).
I hear ya’…So AFAIC as long as the odds of these fires happening are less than 1% there’s really nothing to talk about here & we can get back to discussing real estate prices or tips on the horses at Randwick tomorrow. IOW rational people don’t have anything to worry about here…
Fair enough & you are right of course. As an old bugger this seeming modern obsession with safety just becomes so tiring. of course we have the worst of it here in Australia. When they made wearing bicycle helmets compulsory in the 80’s , bicycle riding rates dropped 40% over night. It’s all bull, as politicians spending the money on dedicated bicycle lanes is way safer than forcing helmet use, plus studies done in Europe show that cyclists riding upright bicycles with normal handlebars fitted with a mirror, pan out at significantly better safety rates, than helmeted riders on dropbar bikes. Simply because it’s better to look at the traffic than at the front tyre rolling over cracks in the road. Look at the stats, it’s virtually always dropbar riders wearing helmets getting bowled over by cars & killed on the road. But the polies persist with their helmet obsession, it’s gotten so bad one can always pick Australian tourists in the Netherlands, Low Saxony & Denmark as they’re the only ones wearing helmets there.I hear ya’…
But it’s the concerns and discussions and education of rational people in the first place that has brought the odds of so many (bad things) happening down so low. Without ongoing talking to each other, without evangelizing for best practices, without appropriate warnings, the odds would soon go wayyyyyyy up.
Each of us gets to set own safety thresholds and degrees of concern based on the knowledge that’s being shared, of course, and that‘s the way it should be. Some will be alarmed at certain things, others couldn’t care less. But we wouldn’t even know the odds were so low for some things unless discussed it all (with the resulting and expected huge range of concern).
Consider that 1% is one in one hundred. I am not a math person, or statistician, so I am sure this is wrong, but: If there are 100 battery powered EVs (scooters, bikes, whatever) in an apartment building, there could then be a 100% chance of a fire happening to one of them at some point in it's lifespan.AFAIC, anything less than 1% is ok.
Agreed.Fair enough & you are right of course. As an old bugger this seeming modern obsession with safety just becomes so tiring. of course we have the worst of it here in Australia. When they made wearing bicycle helmets compulsory in the 80’s , bicycle riding rates dropped 40% over night. It’s all bull, as politicians spending the money on dedicated bicycle lanes is way safer than forcing helmet use, plus studies done in Europe show that cyclists riding upright bicycles with normal handlebars fitted with a mirror, pan out at significantly better safety rates, than helmeted riders on dropbar bikes. Simply because it’s better to look at the traffic than at the front tyre rolling over cracks in the road. Look at the stats, it’s virtually always dropbar riders wearing helmets getting bowled over by cars & killed on the road. But the polies persist with their helmet obsession, it’s gotten so bad one can always pick Australian tourists in the Netherlands, Low Saxony & Denmark as they’re the only ones wearing helmets there.
As a slightly mathy person, a 1% chance of a battery having a fire within its lifetime with 100 batteries would end up being about a 63% chance of fire. (The perfectionist in me has to acknowledge it's more complicated because not all batteries would be at the same point in their lifecycle, but that's not going to make a significant difference)Consider that 1% is one in one hundred. I am not a math person, or statistician, so I am sure this is wrong, but: If there are 100 battery powered EVs (scooters, bikes, whatever) in an apartment building, there could then be a 100% chance of a fire happening to one of them at some point in it's lifespan.