Tourezrick
10 mW
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
- Messages
- 23
It seems that every day I read a new article about which battery chemistry is "best" for e-bikes. As a person who just finished building his first personal electric vehicle, a trike with C'lyte X5 hub, my focus to this point has been exclusively on the thing I am most familiar with - the recumbent trike. Making a decision on the hubmotor wasn't that difficult, I started out with a WE BL36 400w pedal first, and after discovering that I couldn't get the power I needed from 400w (knew it all along, but $250 incl. batts. seemed like a good way to jump in) despite how hard I pedaled, the X5 series seemed like the only answer. Now, I'm a 'FROG' - a fat retired old guy, not that I can't or don't ride - I do - a lot - over 4000 miles this year on my Scorpion trike. But a low slung recumbent trike is not the wisest choice around for a PEV. The soccer moms and A-Type dads just don't respect something that doesn't even come up to bumper height on their Hummer, and I'm not a testosterone driven confrontational type, 15 years as a WaDo Ryu black belt taught me the foolishness of going to war over every provocation. Being visible and able to maintain 25 - 30 mph when needed is what it's all about for me. That and some range from the batteries. I've gotten 33 miles from the WE setup, with more still available in the 'cans' and had solar panels adding a little (45w) bit, and a lot more weight, but dropped to 7 miles with the X5 hub and solar. Sure I goosed it up to 25 mph - 60 still isn't that old, but went back down to a more sustainable 12 right way. But, still - gotta get more than 7 miles on a charge!
So, back to batteries. I understand the chemistry and potentials (sorta) and economics (very) of various batts, and understand that everyone has opinions, just like bodily orifices, but no sooner do I think I have a handle on it and decide on LiFePo4 with Ping, along come more articles saying NiMh, NiCad and carbon foam sla are the 'thing' for Ev's! I thought Ni chemistry was past prime, and carbon foam is new to me. Again, I know one man's opinion is another's tp, but what does this forum think? Ping or competition for LiFe, Ni ??? SLA in whatever form??
So, back to batteries. I understand the chemistry and potentials (sorta) and economics (very) of various batts, and understand that everyone has opinions, just like bodily orifices, but no sooner do I think I have a handle on it and decide on LiFePo4 with Ping, along come more articles saying NiMh, NiCad and carbon foam sla are the 'thing' for Ev's! I thought Ni chemistry was past prime, and carbon foam is new to me. Again, I know one man's opinion is another's tp, but what does this forum think? Ping or competition for LiFe, Ni ??? SLA in whatever form??