On the Saturation Current of Hub Motors & Simulator Accuracy

OK, so I took a new Nine Continent motor off the shelf and went ahead with replacing the phase leads with 12 AWG wire. How liveforphysics managed to pull 10 gauge and the 5 hall leads through that channel I will never know! Unfortunately it was only after doing all this that I realized I had accidentally grabbed a 6 turn rather than a 7 turn hub from the shelf. Whoops! So even with the full 100 amps I was only just at the knee of the saturation point.

2806 Stall Torque.jpg

So far it looks pretty good. Again the data for the 90 and 100 amp tests have a fair bit more uncertainty than the other values, because of the tight time frame required to get the peak force readings. In this case the phase windings were heating up and raising in resistance fast enough that the power supplies would quickly get voltage limited, so I first put a bunch of parallel LiFePO4 cells in series with the power supplies to up the voltage a bit, and then even went to a large 12V SLA in order to have a high enough voltage for the 100A test.

Then I discovered that we still had around our first sample Nine Continent stator from a couple years ago, and this was a 7x9 winding, hoorah. Did the 12 gauge phase wiring fix. In this case, the phase resistance is over twice as high as the 10x6 winding in the previous test. So to get up to the current levels I had add in series to both my power supplies, plus a 12V SLA, PLUS a pair of parallel connected 24V NiMH packs.

Batteries on Power Supplies.jpg

So the peak output voltage was 12 + 24 + 10 + 8 = 54V, and even then I wasn't able to get a stable 90 or 100A current in order to really push things into saturation. The winding resistance would shoot up too fast making it hard with all these supplies to keep a steady and exact current, and then I'd have to wait an hour or so for the motor to cool down completely to try it again. But I was able to get a stable reading at 80 amps, (equivalent to 120 amps on the 10x6 winding tested above), and the results look like this:

2809 Stall Torque.jpg

It looks like saturation or 2nd order effects start to happen at around 70 Newton-Meters, exactly the same torque where the BMC hub started to show this behaviour. In the case of the 9C hub, the motor constant K decreases by about 40% after this point, while the BMC motor it decreased just a little more, by 46%.

So there you have it folks! One thing that became clear to me in these tests though, was that even if there wasn't any saturation/demagnetization effects going on, just the I^2R consequence of pushing the motors this far means we are in a domain that is totally outside of any useful operating zone. The windings get hot, FAST, and that has huge effect on the motor performance. I had the current going through for just 10-15 seconds in order to get a peak torque reading, then would have to put the motor outside in the subZero weather and wait a good amount of time for it to cool off.

If I was to do this test again, I would drill big hole in the side cover and spray water on the windings to keep things cool and save a bunch of time. If anyone was planning to use the hubs in a vehicle that was going to sustain these kinds of loads, then they would also want to look at active cooling.

Justin
 
Oh, I also tested a Crystalyte 406 hub while I was at it. Unfortunately it also had the problem of melting phase leads before we could reach clear saturation. I was able to get 70 amps though:

406 Stall Torque.jpg

The plan will be to redo this test with one of the 4011 hubs. I've got a 60V 30A and 60V 18A power supply, so with both of those in parallel we'll be able to push to the equivalent of 90 amps through a 406.
 
Vanquizor said:
justin_le said:
I'll try to repeat the same test with a Nine Continent hub, putting whatever current is required to have the same 38 N-m of torque and then see how long it takes for the motor to get so hot that the magnets start to demagnetize. Then we'll know which of the two hub designs hits the thermal limit first. Anyone wagering bets?

Assuming you use a 7 turn hub I'm betting it'll be ~34amps and it'll take 36 minutes to cook the same as the EZ.

Hmm, I feel like you maybe knew something that we didn't! I was actually expecting the Nine Continent motor to come out ahead in this comparison, because even though it has a significantly higher winding resistance, I thought that the direct thermal path between the magnets and the casing would keep them cooler for longer. But NOT SO. Here is the raw data, done with the same 9 turn winding that I used for the saturation experiment:

[pre]Radius 275 mm
Kv 1.38 Nm/A
Tc 0.0040 /degree
Mins Amps Volts Force Torque Est Temp
0 26.5 9.03 30.8 37.67 25
1 26.5 9.68 30.8 37.67 43
2 26.5 10.12 30.8 37.67 55
5.25 26.5 11.38 31 37.92 90
8 26.4 12.1 31 37.92 110
10.75 26.4 12.93 30.8 37.67 133
14.5 26.4 13.87 30.2 36.94 159
17 26.5 14.6 29.6 36.21 179
20 26.5 15.32 29 35.47 199
22.5 26.5 15.88 28.4 34.74 215
25.75 26.5 16.61 27.6 33.76 235
27.5 26.5 17 26.8 32.78 246
29 26.5 17.28 26 31.8 253
29.75 26.5 17.4 24.2 29.6 257
30.5 26.5 17.49 21.8 26.67 259
31 26.5 17.56 20.2 24.71 261
31.5 26.5 17.61 18.6 22.75 263[/pre]

Just before 30 minutes, the torque started dropping off pretty fast. I let it go quite a bit farther than I did with the eZee hub this time around just to see what would happen. I tried to also get a casing temperature reading since that would have been very useful to attempting to make a thermal model of the hub, but the polished aluminum side plates totally mess with the IR thermometer and I didn't have the foresight to paint a small black-body patch before the test.

It's interesting to look at the plotted data and compare with that from the eZee test:

NC Thermal Test.jpg

Once again, for the first 8-10 minutes there is no real change in the motor torque. But then after this, we start to see a gentle linear decline in the motor torque as the magnets get hotter. I am presuming (though would like to confirm with tests) that this drop in torque and magnetic power isn't permanent, so if the motor is cooled again it would revert back to its original condition. Then, at just before 30 minutes when the windings have reached 250 degrees celcius, the torque starts to fall off quite rapidly as the magnets are cooked to the currie point.

The power input to the hub at the end of this test was 26.5A * 17.5V = 460 watts, quite a bit more than the peak power of 220 watts that went into the eZee hub for the same torque output.

Motor was really hot, and was a little stinky. I pressed the side cover plate off and tons of white smoke ensued. Carried it outside so I could breath, and 5 minutes later it was still smoking:

Smoking NC Hub.jpg

Sometime later I was able to pull the side cover and stator out. By this time the motor had been outside in -4 degree weather for about 10 minutes, but the windings were still 170 degrees!

170 degree NC windings.jpg

I was going to reassemble it once it had cooled to repeat the torque test and see how much permanent demagnetization had taken place. But there was no need, just passing a screwdriver by the magnets, all the magnets that were over the winding hot spots were completely shot, didn't attract the screwdriver at all. Those magnets that were over the lucky winding that didn't have current flowing fared much better.

I was surprised to see the level of damage caused by just 26 amps (equiv to 33 amps on the more common 9x7 winding) for less than half an hour. In an actual ebike, the current would be shared across 3 windings, rather than just the 2 windings here when I powered it from a DC supply. So that would spread the heat out better, and the air convection from the spinning wheel rather than a static wheel would help with the cooling as well. But overall, if you were to use this hub on a long sustained 60 minute hill climb, say like the rocky mountains, well I'm not so sure how it would hold up.

I guess now we want to see how the Crystalyte 5304 compares. Some other weekend.
 
I don't know if I knew something or just made a lucky guess, but how i figured it was based on the winding resistance I counted on the 9C producing ~2.2x the heat but only having 175% of the surface area.

Based on my fuzzy math I give the 5304 about 3 minutes longer than the 9C...

Remind me again what the prize was? Free bicycle tour of Vancouver? EZhub that has been specially "modified" to run 10% faster? :lol:
 
Justin!! :)

I just skimmed through the post really fast .. Amazing work :)!! As a gift for your hard work, I will come over to the shop for a visit :p!.. Lots of new stories to tell :twisted: some are pretty cool ones too.. lets say doing 68km/h on a snowy road, and getting pulled by the cops, and then running away from them.. yup! :mrgreen: and as a proof some I have on video ;) not the police chase one though :( ! I wish I had that 8)

Btw, I would be looking forward for the saturation tests on 53xx motors. I skimmed through the two pages, it didnt fall into my eyes.

I will see you in January, or possibly end of December if the shop is open.

Merry Christmas, and (if we dont see each other) HAPPY NEW YEAR :D

--Fayaz

edit: oops sorry!.. I just saw you mentioning the 5304 in the last post :twisted: gud gud.. a lot of people(including me) are anticipating for this test FOR SURE...
 
kadir said:
edit: oops sorry!.. I just saw you mentioning the 5304 in the last post :twisted: gud gud.. a lot of people(including me) are anticipating for this test FOR SURE...
I am very curious about this too! I do wonder if Justin will have a powerfull enough current source to saturate an X5 though? If I lived close to Vancouver I would lend him a fat Lipo pack to him to do this, but 5000km is a bit too far.
 
ZapPat said:
I am very curious about this too! I do wonder if Justin will have a powerfull enough current source to saturate an X5 though? If I lived close to Vancouver I would lend him a fat Lipo pack to him to do this, but 5000km is a bit too far.

ZapPat ..I wish I can lend him some Lipo !.. I will be ordering atleast 100pcs of the 5S 20C turnigy.. nd a few extra's for just in case moment like the one that happened yesterday...

ZapPat do you remember a picture of Methods, where he stood with the battery on his hands stacked up
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=10817&hilit=Lipo+Porn&start=30

I was increasing the bar by 3 more lipos.. and this is what happened next
p1040022.jpg

p1040023z.jpg

p1040024l.jpg

Then it fell on a circuit board near my feet containing a area where there were spikes of Solder..
And THEN,

Yup! Venting Lipos! Heating to around 80'C measured with the IR temperature sensor :p! What a waste of good Lipo!

But this gives me the opportunity to open that pack now :twisted:

Now lets stop my topic and not waste this nice thread.. I am just waiting for Justin to come up with new charts for 53xx :)..

Oh ZaPpat, justin has enough batteries in his stash :)!.. He is one amazing man .. You should travel the 5000km and visit his store once (it will be worth the travel).. its a really nice place. Not too fancy, but you will know that a Engineer is at hard work..

Edit: ZapPat, I am also the same distance as you are too from Justin..

--Fayaz Kadir
 
kadir said:
Justin!! :)

I just skimmed through the post really fast .. Amazing work :)!! As a gift for your hard work, I will come over to the shop for a visit :p!.. Lots of new stories to tell :twisted: some are pretty cool ones too.. lets say doing 68km/h on a snowy road, and getting pulled by the cops, and then running away from them.. yup! :mrgreen: and as a proof some I have on video ;) not the police chase one though :( ! I wish I had that 8)

You have an incredible knack for getting into trouble Fayaz! The shop is open next week but Justin won't be back until January so there's not much point dropping in until then as there won't be too much going on...I look forward to hearing your stories though haha....

We've got the 5304 we are going to use lined up too so expect to see that relatively soon!

Adam
 
Read the thread. Got the impression it was primarily around the issues of killing the magnets and/or burning up the windings.

I'm thinking that, absent hot weather, the limiting factor on my 400w eZee is going to be stripping the (nylon?) gears.

Truth or fiction?

Either way, can anybody give a dumbed-down version of what's a safe/non-abusive amp setting for the CA with this motor?

Right now, I've the CA limit set to 13 amps - which seems to translate to 430-450 watts.
 
PeteCress said:
Read the thread. Got the impression it was primarily around the issues of killing the magnets and/or burning up the windings.

I'm thinking that, absent hot weather, the limiting factor on my 400w eZee is going to be stripping the (nylon?) gears.

Truth or fiction?

Either way, can anybody give a dumbed-down version of what's a safe/non-abusive amp setting for the CA with this motor?

Right now, I've the CA limit set to 13 amps - which seems to translate to 430-450 watts.

Can't say about the eZee but here is a picture of the gears on my 250W Bafang after 3,000 miles of use, most at 48V and 15A. The gears don't show anything abnormal and look much better than I expected after hearing all of the horror stories about them turning to mush. I recently changed to a sensorless controller with a 21A limit. The eZee motor is beefier than the Bafang so I would not worry about upping your limit.


Bafang 005a.jpg

-R
 
Merlin said:
3 years later....any news? :mrgreen:

Nopa! But, I'm thinking when we do pursue this again that I'll change the strategy to use a high inertia flywheel as the load while dumping massive current through the windings. That combined with a high rate data acquisition of the currents and flywheel RPM's should characterize the torque vs. amps relationship quick enough that the windings don't have to get so smoking hot.
 
Oh yeah, saturation tests. Do you think people around here can handle that kind of hard dose of reality? My guess is that they will continue to ignore it since they have some people who should know better leading the way in talk about ridiculous current levels, especially phase current. Then they ignore it as the root cause of their heat problems. :lol:

John
 
John in CR said:
Oh yeah, saturation tests. Do you think people around here can handle that kind of hard dose of reality? My guess is that they will continue to ignore it since they have some people who should know better leading the way in talk about ridiculous current levels, especially phase current. Then they ignore it as the root cause of their heat problems. :lol:

John

Personality is nothing. Data is everything. Thread bookmarked.
 
Back
Top