A picture will clear things up a bit. We have techs here that rewind motors, but servo motors are quite a different breed. I think the leads that come off the servo motor windings may need a special type of wire, possibly due to high frequencies used to drive the servo. Thanks
The only special wire I know of for high frequencies is called Litz wire. High enough frequency (RF) signals in a wire tend to run closer to the surface than the core of a conductor, so multistrand wire gets used for those, to give more surface for the "skin effect" to use. But that's for much higher frequencies than motors use, AFAIK. If there are motors that use radio frequencies then it may help them.
But it isn't shielded (though you could add a shield, like a braided sheath, to any wire--keeping in mind that whatever you use to insulate between the sheath and the other conductors inside it creates capacitance, so if you *are* using higher frequencies it could affect the signals. (various kinds of coax may have specific frequency bands they work better with, or specific applications, partly for this reason).
I can't see the actual wire used on those leads in the image clearly, but it looks like it's just the stiff motor winding wire twisted up and a contact crimped to it. They don't appear to have any shielding, and don't look like the litz wire I've seen in RF inductors and such (which was pretty floppy, not stiff, in the ones I disassembled while scrapping things for parts i could use for other stuff).
Litz wire is also made with insulation (at minimum some lacquer/enamel like with motor windings) between each conductor. Makes it thicker and so less well-packed than regular wire would be even if they both have the same number and size of strands. .
And yes, it really confused me when people started calling what we have today AI. To me Artificial Intelligence is a computer that learns, and in order to learn you need feedback from the user (otherwise why turn in your math homework
). I don't think anyone that uses ChatGPT has ever taken the time to reply with whether the AI got things correct or not.
When I've tried to use it, mostly to see if it was worth my time, and if it could actually return useful code (jury still out on that one), it doesn't have a "rating" button to tell it whether hte answer is useful or right or whatever. It doesn't understand feedback in the text itself that tells it it's wrong; it seems to think a new question is being asked, or it gives nonsensical replies, etc.
Google has "labs" taht use AI, and they just recently added a thumbs up / down to the images that the ImageFX produces in response to text prompts. However, the function doesn't appear to do anything, as it doesn't change further output based on using those, in any way, AFAICT.
I use it to create "cover art" for my "music", as I don't have enough time to make the music *and* the artwork, and don't know anyone that is willing to help me out with that (or much of anything else) by making artwork based on what I intend the song to be about. ImageFX sort of kinda does something close enough, after I go thru enough iterations of descriptions. But once it heads down a wrong path, you can't fix that, and it appears to "remember" what it was doing in response to a particular description (even if the words are rearranged but you're still asking for the same thing), so you basically can't get any closer to what you're after once it "goes bad", which will eventually happen with any process with it, if you have to do enough iterations to get what you're after.
