Hi guys,
I'm trying to wrap my brain around some of the fundamentals of motor design.
Much of this will be trivial for those of you with the appropriate knowledge/
background/experience, but I'm trying to catch up fast, so please don't jump on me
for my misunderstandings.
Also, for the purposes of this series of questions I'm for the most part ignoring
"losses" -- induced eddy currents and the like. I know they are important to final
designs, but right now I just consewring the basics.
Starting at the beginning, the typical explanation looks something like this:
Given a magenetic field, and conductor carring a current (into the screen), the
conductor experiences a force (upwards). The force expereinced is proportional to
the strength of the magnetic fields, the strength of the current being carried by
the conductor, and the area of that conductor.
So, given a field strength govorned by the choice of magnet, and the current by the
power supply, to get the most torque (conductors and/or magnets constrained to move in a circle)
we need to fill the gap with as much conductor as possible.
So question 1: why not put one big-assed conductor in the gap?
I think the answer to this is: because a big, solid conductor would experience a
very large back-EMF,
So the typical solution is to fill the gap with lots of small insultated conductors:
Usually, round, but with square magnet wire, you can achieve a "higher fill factor".
Also possible are "foil-wound" coils (Question 2:Though I see little mention of them here or elsewhere. Why?):
My next question 3: does it matter which way the "width" of the foil runs through the gap?
Finally, we arrive at the question that's been bugging me the most, but which I've been
unable to find an answer to despite reading dozens of articals and papers.
Typically, the individual conductors running through the gap are connected serially, as a part of a coil:
With the "other side" of the coil doing duty passing through a field elsewhere in the motor, but
giving rise to losses and cost due to the "end turns".
So, question 4 is: why are they connected serially?
Why not connect the individual conductors through the field in parallel?
I'm sure there is a good reason, because no one seems to do it, I just don't see what that reason is?
Thanks for your time and expertise,
Buk
I'm trying to wrap my brain around some of the fundamentals of motor design.
Much of this will be trivial for those of you with the appropriate knowledge/
background/experience, but I'm trying to catch up fast, so please don't jump on me
for my misunderstandings.
Also, for the purposes of this series of questions I'm for the most part ignoring
"losses" -- induced eddy currents and the like. I know they are important to final
designs, but right now I just consewring the basics.
Starting at the beginning, the typical explanation looks something like this:
Code:
^
|
+------+ - -|- - +-------+
| | - -|- - | |
| | - +|+ - | |
| N | - |/| - | S |
| | - +-+ - | |
| | - - - - | |
+------+ - - - - +-------+
conductor experiences a force (upwards). The force expereinced is proportional to
the strength of the magnetic fields, the strength of the current being carried by
the conductor, and the area of that conductor.
So, given a field strength govorned by the choice of magnet, and the current by the
power supply, to get the most torque (conductors and/or magnets constrained to move in a circle)
we need to fill the gap with as much conductor as possible.
So question 1: why not put one big-assed conductor in the gap?
Code:
/^\
|
+------+ +-----+ +-------+
| | |/////| | |
| | |/////| | |
| N | |/////| | S |
| | |/////| | |
| | |/////| | |
+------+ +-----+ +-------+
very large back-EMF,
So the typical solution is to fill the gap with lots of small insultated conductors:
Code:
/^\
|
+------+ +-+-+-+ +-------+
| | |/|/|/| | |
| | +-+-+-+ | |
| N | |/|/|/| | S |
| | +-+-+-+ | |
| | |/|/|/| | |
+------+ +-+-+-+ +-------+
Also possible are "foil-wound" coils (Question 2:Though I see little mention of them here or elsewhere. Why?):
Code:
+------+ ||||||| +-------+ +------+ ------- +-------+
| | ||||||| | | | | ------- | |
| | ||||||| | | | | ------- | |
| N | ||||||| | S | | N | ------- | S |
| | ||||||| | | | | ------- | |
| | ||||||| | | | | ------- | |
+------+ ||||||| +-------+ or +------+ ------- +-------+
Finally, we arrive at the question that's been bugging me the most, but which I've been
unable to find an answer to despite reading dozens of articals and papers.
Typically, the individual conductors running through the gap are connected serially, as a part of a coil:
Code:
+--------------------------------------+
|+------------------------------------+|
||+----------------------------------+||
|||+--------------------------------+|||
||||+------------------------------+||||
|||||+----------------------------+|||||
||||||+--------------------------+||||||
+------+ ||||||| +-------+ +------+ ||||||| +-------+
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
| N | ||||||| | S | | N | ||||||| | S |
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
+------+ ||||||| +-------+ +------+ ||||||| +-------+
||||||- |||||||
|||||+---------------------------+||||||
||||+-----------------------------+|||||
|||+-------------------------------+||||
||+---------------------------------+|||
|+-----------------------------------+||
+-------------------------------------+|
+
giving rise to losses and cost due to the "end turns".
So, question 4 is: why are they connected serially?
Why not connect the individual conductors through the field in parallel?
Code:
- -----+++++++ +++++++---- +
+------+ ||||||| +-------+ +------+ ||||||| +-------+
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
| N | ||||||| | S | | N | ||||||| | S |
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
| | ||||||| | | | | ||||||| | |
+------+ ||||||| +-------+ +------+ ||||||| +-------+
+++++++--------------------------+++++++
I'm sure there is a good reason, because no one seems to do it, I just don't see what that reason is?
Thanks for your time and expertise,
Buk