tiny_n_terrible said:
They remind me of another old asshat poster here named SAFE.
Do you have your Mothers hair?
Actually, they don't remind you of him at all. You didn't even register until he was gone. Excuse me, didn't register THIS name until he was gone. And mom still has her hair, herself.
Drunkskunk said:
Funny about that. Of all the posters here, Tiny seems most like the old Safe. . . .
Now I wonder how Tiny would even know who he was....
Safe wasn't this bad, at least what I saw of him on other forums. (Haven't read that much of him here.) There's another recent trolling that's more like the Safe that I know. This one, I'd like to call it 99.44% certain, you find the identical behavior if you look up that favorite word of his.
tiny_n_terrible said:
Re: The backers of the Bundy Oregon insurection.
Postby Dauntless » Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:53 pm
You got that a little mixed up: It was as many as 400 Bundites, several of whom were armed, against 200 HEAVILY ARMED Bureau of Land Management (BLM) agents. If the agents had been psycho, they'd have mopped up the Bundites, who were mostly having Gandhi fantasies.
"Financial backers?" Are these the people who brought them snacks? Your description of the whole thing is a little much.
So now you're trying to prove you're wrong? As has been said about you under both your names, you sure do become incoherent.
Was his old name banned, or did he just stop using it?
Ah well, far more interesting is the subject Mr. Physics wants to discuss. A perfectly stable government is a fallacy. But a perfectly stable group of ungoverned people packed in a small area is an even bigger fallacy. The real issue is, as the Romans said, "Who watches the Watchmen?" There's a huge problem in America with the watchmen lashing out when they're watched. Increasingly, government is for the sake of government. Doing incredible harm and little or no good, i.e. Obamacare, the government will tell you that's their their prerogative and how dare wikileaks release the State dept. internal information of Hillary Clinton ordering attacks to destroy people voicing opposition in the U.S.?
As for governments rotting and collapsing from the inside, there has been occasions our own U.S. government has done so, figuratively speaking. As with the last three elections, 2010-2014, those who corrupted themselves into a certain violation of the public trust have largely been thrown out. The beauty of the system has been that another simply grows in its' place, without violent insurrection. The lone exception, the American Civil War, was caused by so much willful disregard that was beyond what has been occurring lately. But we really are progressing toward that point.