Hey ES,
I've now officially read every thread there is about waterproofing electronics.
Two things I've noticed: there seem to be a lot of people against potting the controller, for two main reasons:
1) Heat dispersion
2) Impossible to replace components when something breaks
First of all, let me say that air has a thermal conductivity of 0.026 W/m.K source
This is a very bad heat transfer medium of course, as demonstrated by people oil cooling their hubs.
I think that the hottest parts in a controller are the fets, which are heatsinked to the aluminum case.
There's also a drain down resistor which gets hot:
This I don't understand, as epoxy typically has a thermal conductivity greater than air, so it should help remove heat from the resistor, faster than an air gap (which is what it is now) would.
Anyhow, I found a material which I think would be perfect for potting controllers:
Out of their line-up of gels, I find the SE4445CV to be the best suited: easily removable afterwards due to the fact it does not harden, but becomes a gel like substance, and a thermal conductivity of 1.26 W/m.K, 48 times better than air!
What do you guys think about it?
I've now officially read every thread there is about waterproofing electronics.
Two things I've noticed: there seem to be a lot of people against potting the controller, for two main reasons:
1) Heat dispersion
2) Impossible to replace components when something breaks
First of all, let me say that air has a thermal conductivity of 0.026 W/m.K source
This is a very bad heat transfer medium of course, as demonstrated by people oil cooling their hubs.
I think that the hottest parts in a controller are the fets, which are heatsinked to the aluminum case.
There's also a drain down resistor which gets hot:
Jeremy Harris said:Many controllers use a big power resistor to drop the input voltage to the regulator. These can run pretty hot, so coating them in thick epoxy might not be a good idea. There are controllers on the market that are potted in resin, but some have proven to be highly unreliable. Tongxin sold/sell a tiny potted controller, but they fail because of local heating internally. Two that I've seen have had burnt areas around the current shunt, showing that the potting was acting as a good thermal insulating layer, to the detriment of reliability.
This I don't understand, as epoxy typically has a thermal conductivity greater than air, so it should help remove heat from the resistor, faster than an air gap (which is what it is now) would.
Anyhow, I found a material which I think would be perfect for potting controllers:
THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE GELS
Dow Corning silicone gels are soft and cure to form a cushioning, low-modulus, resilient, gelled material. Cured gels retain much of the stress relief capability while developing the dimensional stability of an elastomer.
Dow Corning offers a line of thermally conductive gels that couple the stress-relieving capability of a silicone gel with the ability to dissipate heat from devices.
These thermally conductive gels can be used as potting materials for transformers, power supplies, coils, relays and other electronic devices that require a low-modulus material for thermal dissipation.
They can also be used as ingredients in formulations for thermally conductive gel sheets.
These silicone gels cure without exotherm at a constant rate regardless of sectional thickness or degree of confinement.
Dow Corning features thermally conductive gels that have controlled volatility, including one UL 94 V-0 approved product.
Specific versions of thermally conductive gels contain glass beads designed to guarantee a minimum bond line, ensuring a reliable electrical insulation.
Those materials find their use as liquid gap fillers and can favorably replace thermal pads.
Out of their line-up of gels, I find the SE4445CV to be the best suited: easily removable afterwards due to the fact it does not harden, but becomes a gel like substance, and a thermal conductivity of 1.26 W/m.K, 48 times better than air!
What do you guys think about it?