Firefly Energy Inc. Chapter 7 bankruptcy

Lock

100 MW
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,082
Location
Toronto Harbour
It's a shame... but likely pure economics: a quote from the article:

The Oasis batteries cost about $450 each, compared with an average battery cost of $146.

"Unfortunately, after three years of extensive efforts to make a commercially-viable alternative to the traditional lead-acid battery, Firefly has not been successful," the news release from the city and county said.

New technology must buy it's way in on the unit performance per $ spent criteria. Looks like Firefly had superior performance, but at 3 X the state of the art cost... it didn't survive. If their claims for Oasis performance were valid, I am surprised they were not the preferred OEM for military vehicle primary batteries. They had a retired general on their board so that opportunity should have been covered.

I would love to be able to do a forensic analysis of their financials, to see where they lost financial control of the company. Those who think starting a company from scratch is easy are nuts, or uninformed... it's a veritable minefield.
 
I guess their strategy of concentrating EXCLUSIVELY on Trucking industry batteries was a whopping success!!

Nine CityLink buses installed Firefly's Oasis batteries in March 2009. Prototype Oasis batteries were also installed in four Freightliner trucks operated by G&D Integrated in Morton in late December 2008.

... and here we are screaming for a lighter alternative to lead but with leads reliability.

Dumbasses.

Oh well at least there is hope that the city will get the patents and they''l probably sell that for pennies on the dollar. Maybe the next buyer will offer a product we can use.
 
fathertime79
2 days ago
Report Abuse
I did work at Firefly for over a year and that place sickened me. I left because they could not consistantly make a battery that worked (they only sent out working batteries for testing and public use) and indeed the management made a great deal of money. The military contracts were funneled to the private sector when needed and they were constantly out of money. It was a horrible place to work and I am very thankful to have found a much better place to be. I feel bad for some of the people who work there who got caught up in this and were just trying to make a living but the management really drove this company into the ground.
 
Lessss said:
I guess their strategy of concentrating EXCLUSIVELY on Trucking industry batteries was a whopping success!!

Nine CityLink buses installed Firefly's Oasis batteries in March 2009. Prototype Oasis batteries were also installed in four Freightliner trucks operated by G&D Integrated in Morton in late December 2008.

... and here we are screaming for a lighter alternative to lead but with leads reliability.

Dumbasses.

Oh well at least there is hope that the city will get the patents and they''l probably sell that for pennies on the dollar. Maybe the next buyer will offer a product we can use.

The Firefly technology might have been slightly lighter than most traditional lead cells, in terms of gravimetric energy density, but it was still really heavy. IIRC the Oasis spec sheet claimed less than 40 wh/kg. It was never going to be useful for EVs, despite all the hype. Even NiCd cells are somewhere around 50-80 wh/kg and LiPos get more like 160 wh/kg.
 
*Bump*
Back in the game, now licensed to India...
http://www.fireflyenergy.co.in/

Press release:
New Delhi, 11 March 2011
Firefly Energy India today announced the licensing of the Battery technology from the USA based Firefly International Energy, post which it plans to manufacture and introduce the deep cycle batteries in Ahmedabad, India.

From here:
http://www.fireflyenergy.com/
On October 1, 2010, Firefly International Energy Co. has acquired assets of Firefly Energy from the Bankruptcy Estate and resurrected its operations at the same location.Firefly International Energy Co. is backed by solid support of technical vision, manufacturing and customer base from India.

Firefly Energy had assembled a world class organization with unique abilities in advanced Lead Acid Battery technology and products. This included all facets of invention / discovery, specific product development and designs, broad test lab capabilities, as well as battery prototype manufacturing capabilities. These abilities came not only from its personnel, but also its excellent 53,000 square foot prototype and test facility located in Peoria IL.

Firefly International Energy Co. understood these unique abilities and quickly moved to retain key staff, all the equipment, intellectual property, building and facilities, as well as key vendor relationships. The key technical talent, including Mr. Kurtis Kelley, the inventor of the technology, is already back on-board and other former employees are committed to support. Firefly International Energy Co. plans to leverage its strategic relationships in India to make the technology much more compelling from a cost stand point, while retaining core R&D and engineering capability with niche manufacturing in USA.

Wonder if Peoria and County EVer got anything back...
loCk

EDIT
Wonder if Peoria and County EVer got anything back...

Here it is. Peoria County Exec.Committee Agenda last September:
http://www.peoriacounty.org/downloa...er/9+-+Special+Executive/100909Execagenda.pdf
Electrotherm Ltd. of Ahmadabad, India has indicated its desire to purchase Firefly's assets.Electrotherm has also indicated that they are willing to satisfy PNC as to the remainder of the amount due on Firefly's loan after the County and City were to pay $2 Million (jointly). PNC has indicated a positive response, but the transaction has not yet been completed. In order to complete the transaction between Electrotherm and PNC, the assets must be capable of being transferred free and clear. Other creditors of Firefly's bankruptcy besides PNC have filed claims of interest in the same assets. The Court-appointed Trustee of the Firefly bankruptcy estate has agreed, subject to the Court's approval, to accept a payment of $500,000 to resolve the claims of Firefly's other creditors for the IP assets. There is a caveat in that the agreement with the Trustee for the $500,000 purchase of the IP assets is independent of the Electrotherm transaction being completed. The Board has previously acted to approve the agreement with the bankruptcy trustee.
In summary, the total cost to the County and City for both proposed payments is a combined $2.5 Million, or roughly two-thirds less than was originally anticipated when Firefly filed for bankruptcy. Under the intergovernmental agreement with the City that was adopted when the Firefly loan guarantee was originally created, the County is obligated to pay the first $1 Million and 41.07% of the remaining balance for a total outlay of $1,616,250. This amount is 64.65% of the total $2.5 Million. As a result, the County would receive 64.65% of any royalties paid by Electrotherm. At this time, Electrotherm has agreed to pay a maximum of $1,000,000 in royalties. If the agreement is denied, then the County and the City will be faced with payment demand from PNC for the full amount of their loan, minus anything received at auction for the equipment. It is possible that litigation could ensue as part of PNC's demand for payment. The potential exists that a loss of litigation would mean the County and the City would owe PNC the full amount and any legal fees that are sure to ensue.
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution that would grant the County Administrator the authority with the concurrence of the State's Attorney to negotiate and execute the final agreement

And the minutes:
http://www.peoriacounty.org/downloa...ember/9+-+Special+Executive/100909minutes.pdf
Chairman O'Neill called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. A motion to move into Executive Session to discuss pending litigation was made by Mr. Rand and seconded by Ms. Pearson. Motion carried.
Executive Session - Pending Litigation
A motion was made by Mr. Salzer and seconded by Mr. Mayer to resume regular session. Motion carried.
Resolution
• Settlement of Firefly Energy Loan Lawsuit w/Electrotherm of Ahmadabad, India
A motion to approve the resolution was made by Mr. Mayer and seconded by Mr. Dillon. The motion carried, with Ms. Trumpe voting nay.
Adjournment
Chairman O'Neill adjourned the meeting at 5:45 pm.
 
Back
Top