cycleops612
10 kW
All too hard for me, i have searched, no joy
Issues re a good cheap durable pouch cell lifepo4 (LFP) utility batteries?
please consider in cheap ass 2-350w mode, not 750w+ US mode
.
Batteries are definitely THE expensive achilles heel of ebike/evs. For the frugal majority on the planet, 350 watts max is often plenty to get around, & 24v 15a can manage that.
He can buy fewer cells, or maybe spend the savings on bigger/better cells for range rather than raw power. A poor rickshaw driver e.g.
EU rules, BTW insist on ~250w max.
So, How do the relevant characteristics of otherwise identical pouch lifepo4 cells, differ due to their size? Internal resistance e.g.
Are bigger cells better/worse in any way?
Recharging issues can be critical to rickshaw productivity. Maybe larger cells can absorb more charge, discerningly applied, with less damage/heat.
Bar the obvious current reasons, could there be advantages to using same wh packs, with less voltage but bigger cells?
Methinks a big advantage of pouches is the simplicity of relatively huge cells vs scores of complexly connected canister cells. So why not extend this logic to, "a bigger lfp pouch beats a smaller lfp pouch"?
Then, we have the converse, related practice, of makers like Ping, using smaller parallel cells for higher c-rates. (their 15 ah packs are made of groups of 3x 5ah cells i think)
How does this tie in with internal resistance etc. as above. Are there downsides? Longevity?
As the quip goes, sorry its so long, i didnt have time to make it short.
I think my query comes down to the specs of internal resistance of differing cells, and the effects of this.
Economics can still trump tech tho. If larger cells are cheaper and more durable pro rata, they are still a buy, lo volt warts and all.
Fewer cells = simpler more servicable battery. Tracing and replacing failed cells is much simpler.
since i am at it, a dimension that can matter a lot in a pack, is that it is narrow enough to fit ideally between the riders legs, yet pedal ok.
this dimension is dictated by the number of pouch cells laid flat in the conventional brick pak. More cells = thicker.
Issues re a good cheap durable pouch cell lifepo4 (LFP) utility batteries?
please consider in cheap ass 2-350w mode, not 750w+ US mode
Batteries are definitely THE expensive achilles heel of ebike/evs. For the frugal majority on the planet, 350 watts max is often plenty to get around, & 24v 15a can manage that.
He can buy fewer cells, or maybe spend the savings on bigger/better cells for range rather than raw power. A poor rickshaw driver e.g.
EU rules, BTW insist on ~250w max.
So, How do the relevant characteristics of otherwise identical pouch lifepo4 cells, differ due to their size? Internal resistance e.g.
Are bigger cells better/worse in any way?
Recharging issues can be critical to rickshaw productivity. Maybe larger cells can absorb more charge, discerningly applied, with less damage/heat.
Bar the obvious current reasons, could there be advantages to using same wh packs, with less voltage but bigger cells?
Methinks a big advantage of pouches is the simplicity of relatively huge cells vs scores of complexly connected canister cells. So why not extend this logic to, "a bigger lfp pouch beats a smaller lfp pouch"?
Then, we have the converse, related practice, of makers like Ping, using smaller parallel cells for higher c-rates. (their 15 ah packs are made of groups of 3x 5ah cells i think)
How does this tie in with internal resistance etc. as above. Are there downsides? Longevity?
As the quip goes, sorry its so long, i didnt have time to make it short.
I think my query comes down to the specs of internal resistance of differing cells, and the effects of this.
Economics can still trump tech tho. If larger cells are cheaper and more durable pro rata, they are still a buy, lo volt warts and all.
Fewer cells = simpler more servicable battery. Tracing and replacing failed cells is much simpler.
since i am at it, a dimension that can matter a lot in a pack, is that it is narrow enough to fit ideally between the riders legs, yet pedal ok.
this dimension is dictated by the number of pouch cells laid flat in the conventional brick pak. More cells = thicker.