U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti ...

wojtek

100 kW
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
1,021
Location
Luxembourg
http://www.businessinsider.com/wikileaks-haiti-minimum-wage-the-nation-2011-6

...the Obama Administration fought to keep Haitian wages at 31 cents an hour. It started when Haiti passed a law two years ago raising its minimum wage to 61 cents an hour.... Thanks to U.S. intervention, the minimum was raised only to 31 cents.

:x :cry: :? :|
 
..wow.
My government keeps getting sicker and sicker..
 
Shows why, even before the drug wars began, the Juarez maquiladoras all shut down. They were having to pay that outrageous five bucks for a 12 hour shift on the sewing machine. The maquiladoras had previously taken the jobs at the Fara plant in El Paso, where the higher end slacks in the Levi's product line had been sewn for something like 40 years.

I also remember some new 501's costing a weeks pay, from my part time high school restaraunt job. Would you buy some Levi's for say, $150 now?

Not justifying the ugly american, just saying you cannot stay in buisness at all today if you stuck to the 1973 methods. That price for Levis did of course, include at least a 150% mark up at the retailer, who was the only store in the region allowed to sell levi product. We wore a lot of much cheaper wranglers then. :D
 
No surprise there at all, this is what the US does. Try looking into the other methods they use to put local business out of operation so they can move in and monopolize local markets. You'll learn why the Corporate Republic of the Americas isn't very well liked in a lot of places.
 
Yes but to be fair it is not just the US, though they seem to provide the military threat to countries who disagree with the free market doctrine. Most western leaders seem to be in agreement with the free marketeers so even if they are not applying the pressure are quietly allowing this kind of callous disregard for the impoverished to continue. I think it hits us all though . When I was in my 20's most towns in Britain were full of factories and workshops doing something worthwhile, like making clothes, washers, bits of machinary, batteries etc. Now my son is 20 there are just service industries, warehouses (selling on nearly all imported merchandise) and supermarkets,. Hard to think of anything we make any more in Britain, not surprising as what business can compete with a corporation paying 30 cents an hour in Haiti, Morroco or whereever. Even my Brooks saddle though still made in Birmingham is owned by an Italian company.
Rob
 
Government Against Blacks

The other day, I went to Times Square to ask people what government should do to help poor people. Most everyone agreed on the answer: "more social programs and a higher minimum wage."

It's intuitive to think that way. I used to think that, too. When President Johnson declared a "war on poverty," he said "compassionate government" was the road to prosperity for poor people. That made sense to me. At Princeton, I was taught that government's central planners had the solution to poverty.

But then I watched them work. Government spent trillions of dollars on poverty programs, and the poverty level stayed stuck at about 12 percent of the population. It's stayed there for about 40 years.

Now I understand that that government poverty programs encourage people to stay dependent. There's money in it. They policymakers would have known this 25 years ago had they read "The State Against Blacks." The author, an economist, said poverty programs destroy the natural mechanisms that have always enabled poor people to lift themselves out of poverty.

That author is Walter Williams of George Mason University. Williams, who is black, says "there's a huge segment of the black population for whom upward mobility is elusive, and it's because of the welfare state — [AZ2]because of government."

Williams elaborates in a new book, "Race and Economics." A chief culprit, he insists, is the minimum wage.

"Let's not look at the intentions behind minimum wage," he said. "We have to ask, what are the effects? Put yourself in the place of an employer who must pay $7.25 no matter whom you hire. Will that employer hire a person who can only add $3 or $4 of value per hour?"

He will not. And so fewer young people get hired and "get their feet on the bottom rung of the economic ladder." This hurts all young people, but black teens most, he says, because "many of them get a fraudulent education in the public school system. So a law that discriminates against low-skill people has a doubly negative effect on black teenagers. The unemployment rate among black teens today is unprecedented in U.S. history. In the '40s, black teenage unemployment was less than white teenage unemployment."

And yet a Pew survey says 83 percent of Americans support raising the minimum wage.

"People have the misguided notion that the minimum wage is an antipoverty tool."

Economists understand the truth. A survey of the American Economic Association found that 90 percent of economists say the minimum wage increases unemployment.

Williams says the minimum wage law has also been a tool of racism. In his book "South Africa's War Against Capitalism," he studied that country's labor markets during apartheid:

"White racist unions in South Africa that would never have a black as a member were the major supporters of minimum wage laws. Their stated purpose was to protect white workers from having to compete with low-skill, low-wage black workers. In the United States we found some of the same reasoning for support of a super minimum-wage law," the Davis-Bacon Act, which forces taxpayers to pay union-like wages for government-funded construction projects.

Williams says other programs designed to help the poor — like welfare payments — have wrecked the lives of millions of black people. He likens the welfare state to a "drug pusher" that keeps people dependent and in poverty.

"The welfare state has done to black Americans what slavery (and Jim Crow and racism) could not have done ... break up the black family. Today, just slightly over 30 percent of black kids live in two-parent families. Historically, from the 1870s on ... 75-90 percent of black kids lived in two-parent families."

Why does the welfare state create illegitimacy?

"(Without welfare,) people would decide, 'I'm going to go out and get a job, I'm going to live more responsibly.'" And that would include getting married before having children, something the welfare system discourages.

I believe the creators of the welfare state had good intentions, but good intentions aren't good enough. Even if deficit spending were not bankrupting America — which it is — America should end these programs.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at http://www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
 
Most anti poverty programs were politically DESIGNED to keep people dependent on them. They were not originally envisioned to be so. For instance welfare. You can't work and be on welfare. That is stupid, someone on welfare finally gets a job it is likely to be low paying and not pay as much as welfare, so the choice is between working for half the income(and paying a babysitter) or staying on welfare. Why were they designed this way? A capitalist economy NEEDS a poverty class to exploit to make the system work. The solution here is to income + match. If on welfare and you get a job your welfare is reduced but you keep enough to actually come out ahead than just being on welfare. Of course such changes are fiercely opposed but certain political factions because they don't want such systems to actually work. They want the poverty class
Particularly in the US one party will implement a system and the other party will sabotage it, or fight the necessary changes to actually make it work.
 
I don't pretend to understand the goverment's reasons behind pushing for a lower minimum wage in Haiti. They could be sinister, or not. But I can see where keeping the wage low would be a good idea at this point in time. Haitians need jobs. They're starving to death, and the country still hasn't recovered from the quake. Any job would do at this point, enough to buy a handfull of rice and a plastic tarp to make a home out of would be more than they have right now. If the minimum wage is to high, then companies won't come back to haiti, and it won't matter how high minimum wage is, there won't be any jobs. You also tend to instagate inflation when raising the minimum wage.
 
Back
Top