AussieJester
1 TW
Maxxis Hookworms with slime filled inner tubes are also good choice if we are talking tires...
KiM
KiM
Exactly what I was thinking!methods said:I think that the mere mortal folks around here could do well by running 12AWG through the axle using your methods
dogman said:Back to the wires issue, the big diameter bearing is the design improvement all motors need. Custom covers so we can mod motors would be nice!
It not only allows any size wire to go through without going though the axle, it allows the wires to enter the motor without getting anywhere near the dropouts and getting cut. the large axle size at the bearing also allows an integrated tourqe arm, so the axle can be normal size and round. Amazing how nuts don't strip when 50% of the threads haven't been machined away to make a flat sided axle. This is how heinzmann did it, no doubt patented, but there has to be a way to make a new design different enough to get around that.
El_Steak said:Wow, this is exacly the info I was looking for! Thanks.
Were you able to remove the cover with a knife/screw driver to pry it off or did you use a gear puller or other special tool?
El_Steak said:Wow, this is exacly the info I was looking for! Thanks.
Were you able to remove the cover with a knife/screw driver to pry it off or did you use a gear puller or other special tool?
Chalo said:I'm curious as to whether you've done a calculation to reckon how much resistance/power you save in this case. It's true that the 9C motor leads are pretty small, but they're also pretty short. We accept small but short conductive paths at connectors and in PCB traces without taking heroic measures to enlarge them (usually).
In my former life as a rocket surgeon, I used milspec teflon-jacketed wire that packed a whole lot of conductor into a small total diameter. Teflon-covered wire would be easier than rubber-covered wire to pull or push through a crowded hollow axle. The silver-plated strands in that wire were superb at taking solder.
Such wire is usually pretty expensive, but this supplier has it for cheap:
http://www.surplussales.com/wire-cable/Wire4.html
Chalo
TMaster said:I've always wondered about this situation with a brushless motor. There is a difference because you are really sending the motor an alternating current instead of direct. I'm not sure how the current/amps works in this situation, but there are 3 wires to spread the load instead of 2. The smaller gauge of wire may go futher in the amperage capability in this situation. I just don't know, maybe someone does?
Just using P = I^2 * R as a guide, and .004 ohms/foot as a conventional value for 16 awg wire, I get 50A^2 * .004 ohm/ft = 10W per foot at 100% duty cycle. 50% duty cycle on three one-foot-long leads equals 15W. That's annoying, but it's an order of magnitude less than what you came up with. Where's the discrepancy coming from?liveforphysics said:Just worked out the numbers. If the factory wires are 16awg, and you just plug them in from the supplied pigtail, then at 25amp battery current with 50% duty cycle, phase current would be 50amps, and V-drop across the wires would be 2.53v. This is only 126watts, but it's 126w being wasted as heat that I would rather be putting towards moving the bike rather than heating it. Of course for larger input currents it will be dropping more voltage and doing more heating.Chalo said:I'm curious as to whether you've done a calculation to reckon how much resistance/power you save in this case. It's true that the 9C motor leads are pretty small, but they're also pretty short.
I mainly did this as a reliability thing rather than performance thing, as I've heard so many folks say the wires get blisteringly hot and melt/short under high current loads.
Chalo said:Just using P = I^2 * R as a guide, and .004 ohms/foot as a conventional value for 16 awg wire, I get 50A^2 * .004 ohm/ft = 10W per foot at 100% duty cycle. 50% duty cycle on three one-foot-long leads equals 15W. That's annoying, but it's an order of magnitude less than what you came up with. Where's the discrepancy coming from?liveforphysics said:Just worked out the numbers. If the factory wires are 16awg, and you just plug them in from the supplied pigtail, then at 25amp battery current with 50% duty cycle, phase current would be 50amps, and V-drop across the wires would be 2.53v. This is only 126watts, but it's 126w being wasted as heat that I would rather be putting towards moving the bike rather than heating it. Of course for larger input currents it will be dropping more voltage and doing more heating.Chalo said:I'm curious as to whether you've done a calculation to reckon how much resistance/power you save in this case. It's true that the 9C motor leads are pretty small, but they're also pretty short.
I mainly did this as a reliability thing rather than performance thing, as I've heard so many folks say the wires get blisteringly hot and melt/short under high current loads.
If folks are burning their motor leads, I'd look at connectors and crimps first.
Chalo
ZapPat said:So for under 1km I used 315Wh --> that's over 300Wh/km in about 5 minutes of riding!!! No wonder it was steeming after 5 minutes of this! Outside temp was about -7oC BTW.
Hyena said:ZapPat said:So for under 1km I used 315Wh --> that's over 300Wh/km in about 5 minutes of riding!!! No wonder it was steeming after 5 minutes of this! Outside temp was about -7oC BTW.
Yikes, no wonder things are getting toasty in there! Good thing the temp is below 0, it sounds like it's the only thing that's been keeping your wires from completely melting.
Luke, is the outrunner style heatshrink you used better than the average stuff from say hobbyking? I've got plenty of the hobbyking stuff here and thought I'd have a go at rewiring my GM hub. I'm not pumping huge current (~50a) so 12ga would suffice and it should make the fit easier.