It's alive!
8)Ricky_nz said:I have split my main state machine so its easier to write tests that can be used for calibration etc and to separate out the normal operating mode........... This also makes it easier to write alternative state machines for special applications.
I would not move the pwm just based on sound.... This chart shows losses go up by a ratio the same as the PWM frequency eg. 40000 hz will have double the switching losses compared to 20000 hz.Kingfish said:Hey Ricky
I’ve been a happy fly-on-the-wall admiring your progress with enthusiasm (subscribed from the beginning)! When you suggest moving the frequency to 40KHz, target 44KHz instead; that’s twice above (perfect) human level and coincidentally the rate at which early CD-sampling used. It seems to me that frequency generators of that range would be very common. Just my ½ watt. I’ll go away now and back to observing from the wall.
Great work! KF 8)
I can pretty much choose any frequency I want. because I have 120MHz divided in in a 32 bit counter to generate the PWM signals so it will be limited byt other apects of the design. It all starts from a 12MHz crystal. These modern micros make it so easy with internal PLLs .Kingfish said:I’ve been a happy fly-on-the-wall admiring your progress with enthusiasm (subscribed from the beginning)! When you suggest moving the frequency to 40KHz, target 44KHz instead; that’s twice above (perfect) human level and coincidentally the rate at which early CD-sampling used. It seems to me that frequency generators of that range would be very common. Just my ½ watt. I’ll go away now and back to observing from the wall.
This is what makes some of this power electronics design tricky is all the design trade offs and the fact that the component manufacturers can't produce 'ideal' components :lol:Alan B said:Dynamic FET losses will roughly double, but the effective inductive reactance will also double and the capacitance ripple current will go down by half so if you have good FETs and drivers it is not clear what the best frequency is without deeper analysis.
I was just thinking about that yesterday!!! Man thats cool i wonder how far you can push it?Ricky_nz said:Just pulled the scope image of the zero sequence injection in action off my flash drive.
The yellow trace is the input voltage to the block for U phase and the blue is the output voltage of the block for U phase.
This is done on all 3 phases in such a way as to get more voltage swing for the motor using sine waves.
The motor still sees full un-distorted sine waves but at a higher voltage than could be achieved without this code.
From memory I think its about 15% peak voltage increase. It relies on the fact of when one sine wave is at max the other two aren'tArlo1 said:I was just thinking about that yesterday!!! Man thats cool i wonder how far you can push it?Ricky_nz said:Just pulled the scope image of the zero sequence injection in action off my flash drive.
The yellow trace is the input voltage to the block for U phase and the blue is the output voltage of the block for U phase.
This is done on all 3 phases in such a way as to get more voltage swing for the motor using sine waves.
The motor still sees full un-distorted sine waves but at a higher voltage than could be achieved without this code.
I haven't had my morning coffee yet so ....Nuts&Volts said:This essentially means you can get up to 15% more power out of a specific motor, controller and battery voltage setup (that is voltage limited), because you can increase base speed roughly 15%. Or in electrical terms you you can combat the BEMF 15% further out and thus send peak phase current 15% more.
What percentage of battery voltage can you now send the motor? I have seen that battery voltage can be about radical 2 (1.41) higher than motor voltage line to line.
Hopefully everything in my head is somewhat right..
Arlo1 said:h0tr0d you are to impatient. There is many of us working on bad ass controllers but if you want it any faster you need to build your own.
No sorry,h0tr0d said:Any updates on this?
Sales thread?
John in CR said:Arlo1 said:h0tr0d you are to impatient. There is many of us working on bad ass controllers but if you want it any faster you need to build your own.
That or figure out how to get the most out of cheapies. I'm getting 15-25kw peaks at well under 1.5cents/watt. 8)