cell_man Li-NCM triangle packs, two sizes now

The only problems with the 20R that I see as of right now is;
1- lesser capacity
2- Unknown cycle life

Although I've seen some pdf's with quoted cycle life that I didn't believe at the time. I'm pushing mine past 100 cycles soon and I haven't seen any reduction in capacity yet. And I always charge using an RC charger and watt meter.

We'll see what other manufacturers bring to the table. The panasonic pd 2.9ah looks promising but it is too damn expensive. Still for a big pack and if money is of no concern that's the one I'd choose.
 
cell_man said:
I will do some cell tests and post up some comparisons.
Huh? So you have been selling this battery for some time, yet you have never done any official test. So how did you come up with capacity and discharge rate?

cell_man said:
I will do some cell tests and post up some comparisons. I don't want to call out anybody, but I have tested large batches of 22P cells, they do not perform as badly as the below listing suggests and I don't know what the test data at 3 and 5A are supposed to be showing:

http://www.dampfakkus.de/akkutest.php?id=73

Just because something is supposedly independent and I am sure it is independent, but it doesn't mean it is accurate. Are those graphs suggesting that a 22P cell delivers only about 60% of it's capacity at 3A? I hate to disappoint, but if that is what they are stating, they need to get some better test equipment, that is absolutely not true. I looked at test data for other cells on that site and most of them looked surprisingly bad at moderate current levels.
Before you question the legitimacy of that independent test, you need to take a second look at the ACTUAL data presented. Where did it say 60% capacity at 3A? It clearly said 2048mAh at 3A discharge. That's 93%.

I'd love to see your test data and how you can justify even 2C continuous discharge, much less 4.5C.

Take a closer look at the 5A (2.27C) graph. The mean working voltage at that rate is only around 3.4V. This is supposed to be a 3.7V cell. And at 5A it only delivers 1927mAh (88%).

This ICR18650-22p cell is at best a 1C continuous cell, regardless of how you or Justin or anyone else claims.

I personally have not tested this cell, but I don't have any reason to doubt this independent test. But if your test shows otherwise, I will personally buy a few cells and verify the results myself.

Looking forward to see your test data.
 
spinningmagnets said:
I want Paul to make a profit, and I want him to stay in business for a very long time.

+1 on that.

For my first ebike project, I built my own battery.
Partly because I needed an unusual configuration, partly as a learning experience.
Among other things, I learned this: fabricating a battery well is a labor-intensive project!
Good learning project though. For example, made me figure out how balancing cells actually works.

For my second project, I bought an EM3ev battery.

Both batteries work well... but in comparison with a professional build, mine looks a bit like it was built by Fred Flintstone.
And I'm pretty sure the all-in economics come out in favor of the EM3ev pack.
 
SamTexas said:
Huh? So you have been selling this battery for some time, yet you have never done any official test. So how did you come up with capacity and discharge rate?

Every single pack we supply has been tested and it delivers what I suggest it should. I haven't felt the need to post up data so far, we are kind of busy. When things quieten down in October, November, a report including tests on the different cells and also motors we offer is on my list of things to do.

The official battery voltage for the 22P Cell is 3.62V (at 1C discharge), the typical capacity is stated as 2150mAh at 0.2C, 2.75V discharge, minimum 2050mAh under the same conditions. Where does it state anywhere this is a 3.7V cell? My own tests indicate that at typical ebike discharge rates, 2.05Ah plus is to be expected, I have not been disappointed, that is what the measured pack capacity test we do on every single completed pack deliver. I do not hear complaints from my customers that these 22P packs do not deliver, nor do I hear complaints about packs made from these same cells, built by others. I have come up with some figures, 3.6V nominal and approx 2.05Ah per cell. I know these cells have a sloping discharge curve, just like every other cell of this type, that is why I use 14S instead of 13S. They are not meant to be a power cell, they have higher capacity than power type cells, they are cheaper than power type cells. It may surprise you, but we have been very busy this year and in 2 weeks our Annual Audit is due. When I have the new cells I am expecting and I have a little time, i will do some comparison tests on my capacity testing equipment, which can work at up to 6A.

SamTexas said:
Before you question the legitimacy of that independent test, you need to take a second look at the ACTUAL data presented. Where did it say 60% capacity at 3A? It clearly said 2048mAh at 3A discharge. That's 93%.

I'd love to see your test data and how you can justify even 2C continuous discharge, much less 4.5C.

Take a closer look at the 5A (2.27C) graph. The mean working voltage at that rate is only around 3.4V. This is supposed to be a 3.7V cell. And at 5A it only delivers 1927mAh (88%).

This ICR18650-22p cell is at best a 1C continuous cell, regardless of how you or Justin or anyone else claims.

I personally have not tested this cell, but I don't have any reason to doubt this independent test. But if your test shows otherwise, I will personally buy a few cells and verify the results myself.

Looking forward to see your test data.

Ok some figures from here on the 22P:
http://www.dampfakkus.de/akkutest.php?id=73

2A discharge to 3V = 2057mAh (100%) 7.311Wh (95.7% of the nominal rated capacity at 0.2C discharge, 2.75V cutoff)
3A to 3V = 2048mAh (99.6% of 2A Capacity) 7.16Wh
5A to 3V = 1927mAh (93.6% of 2A capacity) 6.475Wh

Firstly these figures are not to the stated cutoff point of 2.75V. If you refer to the data sheet posted up earlier by Neptronix, you will see on Page 5 the relative capacities at various discharge rates. It can be inferred from the stated capacity at 3C, that you should expect 95% of 2050mAh, 1947.5mAh. So actually, if you consider that the LVC is higher in the above test than the official 2.75V cutoff, the test actually correlates quite well.

The figures on the 22P cell are no more more overstated than any other cell type. Manufacturers will always try to put their products in the best light. I also think, that you do not really understand what the ratings mean in general. The max discharge rate does not mean that you should use it at that figure, it just means the cells can deliver that figure. Any cell operating at it's max C rate is at the limit. I believe Samsung come to that figure by determining the max current discharged whilst keeping the cell under a critical temperature. The 22P cell are not claimed to be a power cell, they are somewhere in the middle, with good power and reasonable energy density. There are more expensive cells available with better performance, but they are more expensive. If you want to attack the 22P cells, then attack just about every other cell out there, because they are all rated along similar lines. If you have such an issue with how batteries are tested/rated complain about that, not singling out companies and manufacturers.

My comment about 60% capacity refers to the graphs that are shown in the above site. Can someone please explain to me what exactly the graphs (not the figures) are supposed to be showing, because they make no sense to me. Why can't the graphs just show what the numbers indicate, that would make a bit more sense.

As you pointed out the figures give a working voltage of approx 3.4V at 5A, so for a 14S pack operating at a continuous discharge rate over what I recommend, the mid point is 14*3.4V = 47.6V. I would never recommend anyone uses the packs at that continuous discharge rate all of the time. If you refer to my site, you will see the Samsung are now listed as 3C, my recommendations for their usage is unchanged. You can see the SDI data sheet earlier that states 4.6C, I was calling them 4.5C until I changed it.

I also posted up Justin's data earlier on a finished pack which will not be as good as a single cell, due to losses in cabling, terminations and BMS. If you want to question Justin's data, please start a thread calling out his products and his credential, honesty etc. His Ezee packs use the same 22P cell that we use.

Here is the data for the Panasonic NCR18650PD (2900mAh claimed capacity, 10A Rated, so 3C plus rated, 2.5V cutoff), a very well thought of cell, an expensive cell, that I don't hear complaints about:

http://www.dampfakkus.de/akkutest.php?id=99

From the data:

2A (0.69C) discharge = 2695mAh (100%)
3A (1.03C) = 2703mAh (100.2% of 2A rate) (93.2% of the stated nominal capacity, 2.5V cutoff)
5A (1.72C)= 2544mAh (94% of 2A rate)

Personally, I don't understand what the big problem is. There are pros and cons to every battery. Your statements are singling out individual companies and products, when your dissatisfaction with batteries and their ratings apply to the whole industry. You don't qualify you nasty comments towards myself or others providing the products that are putting people on ebikes, by saying, just like everybody else, these batteries don't deliver the Max discharge rate whilst also maintaining a voltage that I am happy to see. FYI, I have changed the listing for the 22P cell, it now states 3C, my recommended usage is unchanged, I recommend a controller with max current approx 2C or a little over with the 22P cells. Anybody that has aspirations of big power, I suggest they use a different cell type. When I have the 20R and 29E cells SDI cells (both more expensive than the 22P), I will give my honest recommendation for those as well and give provide realistic pack capacity values after running my own tests.

Good Day
Paul
 
Paul thank you for your help and gald to have quailty products with great opion's. Thanks again and don't worry about the sour grape crowd.
 
I can't say enough good things about this pack for my needs. Having nearly a kWh in the triangle of a safe pack has spoiled me quickly.

There have been a few other people popping up on the forum showing off their build and satisfaction, and there has got to be lots of silent happy customers out there. cell_man/Em3EV specializes in MAC kits that like to be 1000W or so continuous power, which would stress this pack just above 1C. If you run a cromotor or very powerful direct drive at 3kW, your better options are low sag, high physical volume A123 or low sag, less worry-proof LiPo. Each of those come at an "Experience Price" trade off of either size/weight on the bike or user-friendliness in terms of charging safety. Paul used to offer cylinder A123 triangle packs of similar dimensions but half the AH, and it sound like the only reason that is not so anymore is due to supply of reliable cells (I never saw a complaint about those packs besides price). If these 22p cells with higher Ah per volume than A123 don't fit your needs, Paul is trying his business best to accommodate that by looking at other cells he could try to source:

cell_man said:
Cost (USD)
ICR18650-22P 4.71USD/cell
INR18650-20R 6.40USD/cell
INR18650-29E 7.65USD/cell

My total cost worked out to be:
Popstar said:
At 14s9p, including assembly, BMS, and shipping to west coast, this ICR18650-22P pack comes to $6.62/cell.

Just as reference, the same samsung 22p cells placed in an eZee pack from ebikes.ca work out to be about $12/cell.

Em3ev/cell_man is transparent in the cells he sells, and given a different use case or price point, he will steer a customer in the right direction for their sake and not just his.

Maybe the 22P cell type should be specified in the Thread Topic name in case future packs use different cells.

-Popstar
 
This blog post is quite relevant to this conversation. Especially the parts at the bottom that get into the nits and grits of NCM chemistry and test data.

http://blog.evtv.me/2013/07/2332/
 
Okay, so 800 city commuting miles on this pack since my last post here.

I ended up limiting my power to 1200W (25A) and I spend the majority of the time commuting @ about 800W @ 16A
Not because the battery can't do more, (it can put out 40A), but because I want it and my motor to last a long time.

I did a long range test with it @ 400W (8A) and it did 45 miles @ 15-20mph with a MAC 10T.

I love the weight and size of this pack, it's so tiny. You can hold it in one hand and carry stuff in the other.

It fits nicely into the frame of the bike, so handling corners at 30mph doesn't have you wondering if the back end will wash out. :)

I think cell_man markets it properly for what it is, a great complimentary battery for the types of motors (MAC) he sells.

The no bullshit technical details on the product page are very much appreciated.
 
Yes on the street 28-30 mph is enough. I was setup for 34mph but it rock the bike on the street and at that speed ? Plus lower amps means lot's more range. Just a little amps = great grain, plus save a battery.
How long would this battery last at 18amps set on your C.A. with a 10t.. Dogman help me slow down as see the sunset as appose to looking for the potholes. Pothole at 28mph or pothole at 34mph ?
 
I highly recommend this battery pack.

I just received mine yesterday and can't believe what a difference it makes!

With my old (SLA) battery pack, @ 20mph speeds, with light pedaling, I was averaging about 4 Ah (25-30 Wh/mile) of energy used per half commute (~7 miles).

I picked up a new 7-speed 11t freewheel (also from cell_man). I can now pedal moderately @ 20mph speeds and am actually able to get a at least some amount of a workout in.

Combined with the new battery pack I only used 1.9 Ah (~15 Wh/mile) of energy for the first half commute today (~7 miles), still at 20 mph speeds.

Most of the energy savings probably come from the reduced weight (14 lbs instead of 60 lbs) and the additional pedal assist.

I also picked up top-end speed. I haven't fully tested it, but have gone at least 31 mph on this battery pack vs. about 27 mph on the old SLA pack.

Having substantially less battery weight and positioning it in the triangle (instead of above the rear wheel) definitely makes the bike feel normal again as well.

I hope to take this on a longer trip (trail ride) this weekend to test out the range.

FYI... my chinese direct drive (conhismotor) motor/controller are rated at 48v 1000w. The controller pulls around 30-31 Amps peek. With this battery pack, that means about 1700-1800 watts peak.
 
This is a great thread, thanks for the information, especially these past posts from cell_man!

For me the ICR18650-22p cell packs a serious punch. We were seeing 4 volts of sag in a 10S7P pack using the ICR18650-22P being discharged continuously at 70 amps.

So 5C discharge for 3-4 minutes and only .4 volts per cell sag on average. They pack a punch in larger packs and don't heat when going over 10 c for bursts. I am really interested in what the 18650-30 Samsung cells can really do. Almost a dream cell if it could do 2C comfortably.
 
I'm a new owner of a 50V 25aH batter with the 29E (high capacity) cells. Using a 40amp controller to run the motor. I've not been told otherwise that this was not the proper setup between battery & controller, otherwise, cellman would have advised me to a safer route. He does show on his website which batteries are best suited for higher power builds and generally hints that continuous high amperage usage of some versions of the cells are not advisable, in which case, you should be looking at the high performance cells on list. What is usually general consensus is that the more Ah you can fit in your build, the safer you should be as you won't stress the cells so much with large amp draws. I think, that's why you see the real pros using RC LiCo (because of it's high performance C rating) paired with higher amp controllers and just enough Ah to get them from point A to point B and nothing more.

I can't tell you if I'm damaging these 29E cells from my 40amp controller. But I really doubt it. I rarely peak at 40amps which is at the initial throttle from a dead stop or a high amount of "wheel drag", say from riding on sand or very steep inclines (which I rarely do). The amps quickly settle to 20amps average once my target speed is reached which my CA is saying is 30+ mph. Not too shabby for a 10t MAC which can take more amps due to the higher turn count and not burn the motor in the process (thanx dogman for your enduring suggestions for initial geared motor setups).

Anyways, back on topic, if you haven't figured it out yet, 18Ah in the triangle is now middle of the road. I have 25Ah in the same real estate. 8) I doubt I can use it all in single day just limiting myself to 20mph.
 
Paul now has two triangle pack sizes, and three 18650-format cell choices.

Samsung 22P Best value
Samsung 20R high current
Panasonic 29E extra capacity, longer range

Small triangle pack
$510, 22P, 12.3-Ah
$630, 20R, 11.7-Ah
$710, 29E, 16.5-Ah

Large triangle pack
$725, 22P, 18.5-Ah
$905, 20R, 17.5-Ah
$1,025, 29E, 25.0-Ah
 
Is their any new cells after the 29E in the pipe line ? i.e more then 2.9 Ah per 18650 cell ?

i have heard a lot of talk about 3.2 AH 18650 3c cells how far away are they in these triangle packs?
 
Did some calculations to see whether or not this bag would fit my Paratrooper, seems like it would! Obviously, it's hard to do any measurements without the bag itself, sort of a crap shoot. Unless I made an error somewhere, the horizontal length of the bike's top + seat + head tubes is roughly 630mm; the image has 225mm. So the scale ratio is 2.8. I had to scale down the bag in the image to correspond to the scale ratio. So, the 430mm / 2.8 = 153.5 ~ 154 mm. So it fits, almost barely, but it fits. Now if this is correct, I need to find out from Paul if the top straps can be extended to account for the unusual tube width.
 
To lengthen velcro you just need more velcro.
I have no idea what numbers your crunching, but the dimensions are in the opening post.
 
Does anyone have any experience with either of these triangle packs?
 
Bump...
 
pwd said:
Does anyone have any experience with either of these triangle packs?

Right off the bat, the smaller packs should fit some bikes with dual suspension. But the bigger packs, I highly doubt it. Choose the cell that best fits your motor/controller performance. I chose the 29E for the added range.
 
Back
Top