From what I can tell neptronix asked, researched and did a damn good job of answering the biological questions he asked himself.
Most likely by doing research on
Pubmed:
PubMed® comprises more than 38 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Where searches for biological info is filtered of BS and you get
Peer Reviewed, Published Research papers by the like of Harvard Medical and co.
The Peer review and publishing Process:
Harvard medical for eg. writes a paper.
Before they can publish it, it gets sent off to Stanford, Oxford, Yale, Johns Hopkins etc for Peer review.
If the paper is controversial, as in claims to have for eg. have found a cure for cancer, the other universities will replicate the study to see if they get the same results.
Only if they do and give 'The Nod' to a study, is it white-balled and allowed to be published.
So;
if you want to take a dump on the advice and experiences noted here, lets make it fun:
Link at least 2 Peer Reviewed, Published papers that contravene what was said, or shut TF up!
Can you do that!?
Do you have the mental capacity to hold your emotions in check and do real research and reference it, before you start banging on your keyboard??
Be Flabbergasted:
There are those that ask questions like:
"Why do we age? And what can we do to slow, stop, or even reverse the process?" and find answers.
Then there are those that don't.
For those that
want to argue with me on this point; I'll be happy to do so.
On:
www.longecity.org
Which is a forum frequented by the type of biologists alluded to above, where you DON'T post without said research references.
It's a much more suitable environment for a debate on the topic.
I am Logic there too.
(Do NB the post counts and T points of the various members there as a means of having some clue of whoTF to listen to)
