Dillenger electric screwed me over, don't buy from them.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah this thread has become interesting and its been getting a bit dry here on endlessphere, not even a good lipo fire story for ages or users willing to uploading destruction pics has been quite annoying.

I think some who are taking the vendors side are just a bit frustrated because lately we have had a few users come up who have bought battery packs that weren't to their liking and when users asked to post photos and details we ended getting this incredibly blurry photos that look like was taken with a digital camera from the 90s and everyone's just been like wtf?
I think some users get real enjoyment helping people fix their stuffed crap but not when they just can't get some basic overview info.

I support blackjackel's point of view. I think hes a good example of the yingyang effect where you need some consumers who don't take a light taking it in the arse with a dodgey back rack and want to utilize the full rights of the law as a customer of a warranty new item.

I remember buying some AAA NiMH on ebay that were rated on them 1800mAh which is a ridiculous capacity claim for that chemistry or that battery size but they were cheap. I remember after getting them and being satisfied that they worked at least like other other ones I bought at the local supermarket that the guys ebay rating was like 99% satisfied customers and the fact the ONLY thing he sold was over rated rechargeable NiMH batteries and I came the the conclusion that %99 of people are too nice.

We already have another user on this thread that said the same thing broke on his Dillenger ebike, with the information we have it sounds like a frequent problem. With enough complaints it might get fixed at the site of manufacture.
.
As far as I am concerned I am one of those people who don't like to complain and if I can fix it my self I normally do, I think some sellers pray on consumers like me and its nice to know there are some people who are willing to stick their head up the ass of some retailers to try and set the record straight.
 

Attachments

  • hans-afuss2.jpg
    hans-afuss2.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 2,062
Its about time someone started making steel racks for these heavy batteries.
 
I would like to thank blackjackel as i guess we are not smart enough to do our own research on the vendors we purchase from. Thank god he was there to show us the errors of our ways. :lol:
 
Food removed.
 
Simonism said:
After such a measured response from Dillenger to these posts and other web-based interventions by what is essentially a ungentlemanly and unilateral smear campaign by blackjackel (under the guise of being "information"), I have to say that, at the moment, this very much comes across as Dillenger:1, blackjackel: 0. I may change my view but I may not, too.

Simonism (who has no connection with Dillenger, but has purchased from them)

Please read my next post where I outline why Dillenger's response was not as great as you may have perceived it to be,it will be the post below this.

Punx0r said:
Consumer laws clearly vary around the world, but in the UK, at least, blackjackel would be completely in the right unless he was misusing/abusing the rack.

If a product is defective from new (badly made or designed) then liability is on the supplier to refund or replace. This liability extends to covering the costs of carriage both ways, which is reasonable.

It could be argued in this case Dillinger is relying on the prohibitive cost of tracked international postage for an entire kit to make the warranty return offered uneconomical. Much like the "warranty" you get buying things directly from China.

IMO an amicable resolution would be to offer a partial refund for the rack only, after checking that it had been used correctly/reasonably.

That's not even considering the claim of a "12 month unlimited warranty". That's a dangerous thing to claim, unless the word "unlimited" when associated with warranties has a particular, established meaning in the U.S. contrary to what it implies.

As a side issue, it's unreasonable to say complaining is unreasonable because the product is Chinese junk. That's fair enough if you take your chances and buy directly from China for buttons via some random guy on Alibaba. You know what to expect there. Buying from a western retailer is different: It might be the same product but in exchange for that markup comes liability. Don't want warranty claims and complaints? Don't sell junk. Simple as. Again, this isn't specifically a dig at Dillinger, just at a general trend I've seen in retail.

That's all I'm saying, I'm not getting my rights even under extremely basic warranty requirements much less the "12 month unlimited warranty" that Dillenger touted.

I agree that the product is probably Chinese junk with how poor the welding job is on it. At first I was surprised it broke but when I went ahead and analyzed the welds and the construction of the rack it was glaringly obvious how insufficient it was.

What was the straw that broke the camel's back was the slap in the face of them offering to sell me a new rack for $50..... $50!!! for something that cost them under $10, not only were they ripping me off out of my warranty, they wanted to make even more money off of me. This is when I decided to make the website.

You are making my point exactly, if I bought the rack for $6 off alibaba, and broke, I wouldn't complain much because I got what I paid for, but I pay nearly $1000 for this kit, I shouldn't get Chinese junk, and if I did, it better damn well be replaced for free....

Thank you for that breath of fresh air of a response! It's really nice that you're looking at this from a purely logical perspective.

TheBeastie said:
Yeah this thread has become interesting and its been getting a bit dry here on endlessphere, not even a good lipo fire story for ages or users willing to uploading destruction pics has been quite annoying.

I think some who are taking the vendors side are just a bit frustrated because lately we have had a few users come up who have bought battery packs that weren't to their liking and when users asked to post photos and details we ended getting this incredibly blurry photos that look like was taken with a digital camera from the 90s and everyone's just been like wtf?
I think some users get real enjoyment helping people fix their stuffed crap but not when they just can't get some basic overview info.

I support blackjackel's point of view. I think hes a good example of the yingyang effect where you need some consumers who don't take a light taking it in the arse with a dodgey back rack and want to utilize the full rights of the law as a customer of a warranty new item.

I remember buying some AAA NiMH on ebay that were rated on them 1800mAh which is a ridiculous capacity claim for that chemistry or that battery size but they were cheap. I remember after getting them and being satisfied that they worked at least like other other ones I bought at the local supermarket that the guys ebay rating was like 99% satisfied customers and the fact the ONLY thing he sold was over rated rechargeable NiMH batteries and I came the the conclusion that %99 of people are too nice.

We already have another user on this thread that said the same thing broke on his Dillenger ebike, with the information we have it sounds like a frequent problem. With enough complaints it might get fixed at the site of manufacture.
.
As far as I am concerned I am one of those people who don't like to complain and if I can fix it my self I normally do, I think some sellers pray on consumers like me and its nice to know there are some people who are willing to stick their head up the ass of some retailers to try and set the record straight.

You summed up why I'm doing this to the T. I couldn't have put it any better myself.

There might be 1000 people that this problem (or some other problem) has happened to, there may be hundreds of others mistreated by Dillenger, but nobody will know... because those people will say "Well, crap, it's only $50, I'll just go buy a replacement part on ebay"... and just let dillenger get away with it. I almost did it myself, till the insulted me with offering to sell me the part for $50 instead of providing the warranty they promised... I decided this is a company that nobody should ever purchase or deal with, or at least that the consumer should know what they're getting into before they get into it.

It was such a load off my mind to read that "unlimited 12 month warranty claim", and as of 3 weeks ago it was such a headache, nobody deserves to go through that.

When I'm sold junk from china for a couple of bucks, then I get what I deserve.... but buying from a western retailer for many many many many times more than I Would have paid to get the product directly from china, I expect a certain level of accountability. A western company that touts to have as much trust as they do should NOT shy out of providing the due warranty that their customers paid for.

KINNINVIEKID said:
Its about time someone started making steel racks for these heavy batteries.

That would be nice, but not 100% necissary, if they had 3 welds spanning across the entire underside of the rack, it would have more than sufficed... instead they put a single weld on the bottom of the rack that spans less than 1/3 of the surface of the rack, and the other two welds are on the side handles which are hollow aluminum tubes.... They didn't even weld the entire tube in, just the very edge of the tube.... this is supposed to hold a 10 pound battery through all sorts of vibrations... ridiculous.

slacker said:
I would like to thank blackjackel as i guess we are not smart enough to do our own research on the vendors we purchase from. Thank god he was there to show us the errors of our ways. :lol:

It's not about you being smart or dumb.... it's about the (possibly) 100's of other people out there that didn't do anything when Dillenger screwed them over... I am their voice. Many others probably came before me that though it was too much of a hassle to deal with Dillenger over a $50 dollar part... I am that exception.

tomjasz said:
Ten minutes on Google and I'd have found a different vendor. Looks to me like folks got the service they earned.

Are you saying I changed your opinion on purchasing from Dillenger? I thought it might take a while for the website to take off, but to hear that it's already having an effect is wonderful to hear.
 
Dillenger_Australia said:
To 'blackjackel'

Sorry you feel like we've done the wrong thing by you. Given the extremely low failure rate of the rear rack battery carriers, and the consecutive failures you have experienced, it is obviously not meeting your requirements.

You're not admitting any wrongdoing on your part, you are saying "Sorry you feel that way" instead of "Sorry for what we did". The fact of the matter is that you promised me an "unlimited 12 month warranty" and refused to live up to that promise.

As someone who rides their kit 100% of the time on paved city roads what exactly do you think my requirements are? As I previously said, I'm not using your product to do any BMX tricks or any off roading or anything like that. This leads me to believe that it's only a matter of time before the rear rack breaks for other people, but that might likely take place outside of the warranty period for them. I doubt you'd replace the part for everyone past the warranty period so perhaps you should design your products in a way that they last a long time even if used in extreme situations (and I'm not saying I used mine in extreme situations). The welds on that rack were clearly insufficient to hold up a 10 pound battery and withstand the vibrations involved in a city road that might contain cracks and other such imperfections.

Dillenger_Australia said:
To 'blackjackel'

We are not intending to avoid our obligations under the warranty, but sending you a 3rd rear rack would be a waste of your time and ours.

This is an outright lie. If you weren't intending to avoid your obligations under warranty:

1- why did you offer to sell me the part for $50 Plus shipping costs?

2- Why did you ignore me for two weeks when I asked you to send me a copy of your warranty policy along with the exact clause that is preventing you from sending me another replacement?

It is not up to you as a company to decide if it will be a waste of time for your consumer or not, your obligation is to deliver what you promised, which is an unlimited 12 month warranty for your product.

Dillenger_Australia said:
To 'blackjackel'

As the product is not meeting your requirements feel free to send the entire kit (including the 2 broken racks if available) picked up and returned to the warehouse in California. Upon receipt of the kit to the warehouse in fair order you will be refunded in full.
I've already washed my hands of your company. Had you made that offer prior to my going through the effort to repair the broken rear rack, and prior to you ignoring my support ticket for two weeks, I would have taken you up on it.

I must admit, I do not find fault in your motor, or controller. The only issue I had was with your treatment of my support needs, your reneging on your warranty promise, and the refusal to admit that your product (the rack) was faulty... instead diverting the blame to me.

Instead of utilizing the information I provided you with, in regards to improving your product and guaranteeing a better experience for myself and your other customers, your belated offer of a refund sidesteps the issue at hand. I don't care to return your product.

Dillenger_Australia said:
To 'blackjackel'

RE trademarks:

Our trademark is not our logo on the products. It is the word 'DILLENGER' so both of the domains registered are currently using our trademark.

I won't comment on this till I speak to a trademark lawyer. The earliest I will be able to speak to a lawyer is next week. In the meantime, I'll be studying up on this and asking around prior to meeting with a real lawyer.

Dillenger_Australia said:
To 'blackjackel'
That's the most we can possibly offer, along with an apology - sorry.

Sam
Dillenger

An apology is worthless without admittance of guilt as well as a willingness to resolve the original issue at hand for your other customers. You've done none of those things, you've apologized for the way I feel rather than your own wrongdoing and instead of offering to fix the issue for your other customers you've simply offered a refund. Also, for a company to apologize once it's been outed for wrongdoing carries very little weight with me... this is why I decided to wash my hands of you, because I knew that you would only spring to action once I brought attention to how you treated me.

It's too late to apologize Dillenger. All you can do now is change your business practices and treat ALL your customers better in the future. Revisit the designs of all your products instead of blaming the consumer. Stop relying on cheaply manufactured and designed racks and products that you may not have designed or manufactured yourself.
 
@blackjackel

Few things I can say that might help you in life:

1- Once the girl said yes, take it or leave it but stop asking.
2- If you didn't like the girl, stop asking her and do it by yourself.
3- Once your load is gone, it is gone and you don't really want it back.

4- Passed a certain age, crying won't convince anyone to wipe the shit off your arse.
 
madrhino, priceless. As i work in a middle school the op act's like a whiny 8th grade school girl when told no you cannot act that way. :mrgreen:
 
Food removed
 
tomjasz said:
$500 lawyer, $50 rack...

I've spent much more than that for a lawyer, last time it was for a $23 overdraft fee that the bank had no right to take. Ended up walking away with all my lawyers feed paid and even made mong off of it. I can't talk about which bank because part of the settlement prevents me from doing so.

If they sue me, I expect to profit off of it. It would be ludicrous but I'm already preparing for that possibility. If it happens, 'm expecting a gag order this time and have already prepared the legal loopholes to get around it. If they decide to gag me before they sue, you will hear about it on the media, I just won't be able to legally speak to anyone about it myself. The groundwork for going to the media Will be laid and a "warrant canary" style trap will be used to trigger it, but I'll stop replying to these posts myself to comply with the warrant.

Right now it's not costing me much at all to speak to my lawyer since I'm tacking it on to other legal work that has to be done anyways, it will only start costing me if they decide to sue... And once either a settlement is reached or a verdict is rendered, I expect that I will win, and get all my lawyers fees paid with a little extra on top. I will be speaking to a trademark lawyer next week, and it seems that won't cost me anything either.

I have no problem putting money where my mouth is to defend myself.

As far as my knowledge I have done nothing illegal.
 
MadRhino said:
@blackjackel

Few things I can say that might help you in life:

1- Once the girl said yes, take it or leave it but stop asking.
2- If you didn't like the girl, stop asking her and do it by yourself.
3- Once your load is gone, it is gone and you don't really want it back.

4- Passed a certain age, crying won't convince anyone to wipe the shit off your arse.

I'm not asking Dillenger for anything for myself, just to cut the crap they pulled with me when it comes to other customers :)
 
Oh boy, my bad for feeding...20 posts all trying to convince the forum you've been hurt. What's the point? No don't answer. This is exactly the kind of thread, post, and poster that ought to be deleted. Every other bright forum I've been on would have called BS 15 posts back.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 1,950
tomjasz said:
Oh boy, my bad for feeding...20 posts all trying to convince the forum you've been hurt. What's the point? No don't answer. This is exactly the kind of thread, post, and poster that ought to be deleted. Every other bright forum I've been on would have called BS 15 posts back.

Not trying to convince anyone of anything, just sharing my experiences with Dillenger so others can make up their own mind.
 
Keep it up; I think that you're really assisting Dillenger to acquire new customers. I won't tell you to get a life because it's obvious that you don't want one.
 
blackjackel said:
If they sue me, I expect to profit off of it. It would be ludicrous but I'm already preparing for that possibility. If it happens, 'm expecting a gag order this time and have already prepared the legal loopholes to get around it. If they decide to gag me before they sue, you will hear about it on the media, I just won't be able to legally speak to anyone about it myself. The groundwork for going to the media Will be laid and a "warrant canary" style trap will be used to trigger it, but I'll stop replying to these posts myself to comply with the warrant.

1. A woman sued my parents because she tripped in front of my parent's house. She had previously tripped in front of someone else's house and received about 300k in compensation. Figured it was the same thing, and thought she'd get even more money. Long story short, the judge decided that one tiny difference was enough, and she ended up having to PAY US 120k in legal fees. Be careful about "expecting to profit" from it. And if this post is quoted in court, expect to get slammed. Nobody is ever expected to profit from a court ruling. At best it's meant to be recompense.

2. If the court decided to gag you, Dillinger could bring this post up as well, and if you tried it, you could be done with contempt of court. Showing prior intention to defy a court order is serious business - criminal, actually - even when coming from a civil case - more likely the order will be phrased "<real name> and his agents". That means anyone you can influence to post on your behalf. And being a civil court, they don't have to prove you influenced them, just judge it was likely that you did.

In other words, so far, if legal action does happen, you're digging your own grave as you post. Don't forget this forum will let you delete posts, but lets anyone check post history, so you can't deny that you posted it.

Dillenger is an Australian company, and in the screen cap you yourself posted, their email ends in .au - that generally means Australian consumer law applies, rather than your consumer law. Under Australian consumer law, vendors have the right to force a settlement by refund rather than continue to cede to unreasonable demands to repair or replace a product that is not suited to purpose.

In all likelihood, I don't see this going any further. So far the response seems to be at least 70:30 in favour of Dillenger, so you're probably giving them more positive PR than the small amount of buyers you're scaring off. Really, you've been Streisand effected yourself.
 
+1 sunder, The op is a jackass who is only digging a huge hole for himself and i pray that he can return to reality. Glad to hear dillenger's side of the story also. Good day. :shock:
 
blackjackel said:
tomjasz said:
Ten minutes on Google and I'd have found a different vendor. Looks to me like folks got the service they earned.

Are you saying I changed your opinion on purchasing from Dillenger? I thought it might take a while for the website to take off, but to hear that it's already having an effect is wonderful to hear.
More food for the troll. No I would have discovered that it's a nice kit for a beginner without much creativity or dream. I out grew that sort of kit in the first month of reading about which direction I would take. If I wanted a kit for a kid I would have considered it. However there's far more exciting and fun bits and pieces out there for someone who wants to grow into the hobby or a better ride. Their business model and kits don't excite me. I'd suggest anyone who wants a very basic setup with no interest in the hobby to consider their kits. A good alternative to the funky little kit sellers who really are a potential problem. From my view they've done far more than I would have done. By a LONG shot. I hope as my little parts business grows, I learn to sniff out the kind of PIA customer you've proved to be, and not sell them a loose screw. I actually had a modicum of sympathy until the BS about lawyers and $23 overdraft whine got vomited.

Again, my favorite forums would have nuked your BS on the second post. I think it's ridiculous that the good folks moderating here let you prattle on. All you've really managed to do is prove that there are incredibly petty people in retail sales. K?
 
Tomjasz,spot on and could have not said it better my midwest brother,happy trails sir. :D
 
Sunder said:
blackjackel said:
If they sue me, I expect to profit off of it. It would be ludicrous but I'm already preparing for that possibility. If it happens, 'm expecting a gag order this time and have already prepared the legal loopholes to get around it. If they decide to gag me before they sue, you will hear about it on the media, I just won't be able to legally speak to anyone about it myself. The groundwork for going to the media Will be laid and a "warrant canary" style trap will be used to trigger it, but I'll stop replying to these posts myself to comply with the warrant.

1. A woman sued my parents because she tripped in front of my parent's house. She had previously tripped in front of someone else's house and received about 300k in compensation. Figured it was the same thing, and thought she'd get even more money. Long story short, the judge decided that one tiny difference was enough, and she ended up having to PAY US 120k in legal fees. Be careful about "expecting to profit" from it. And if this post is quoted in court, expect to get slammed. Nobody is ever expected to profit from a court ruling. At best it's meant to be recompense.

2. If the court decided to gag you, Dillinger could bring this post up as well, and if you tried it, you could be done with contempt of court. Showing prior intention to defy a court order is serious business - criminal, actually - even when coming from a civil case - more likely the order will be phrased "<real name> and his agents". That means anyone you can influence to post on your behalf. And being a civil court, they don't have to prove you influenced them, just judge it was likely that you did.

In other words, so far, if legal action does happen, you're digging your own grave as you post. Don't forget this forum will let you delete posts, but lets anyone check post history, so you can't deny that you posted it.

Dillenger is an Australian company, and in the screen cap you yourself posted, their email ends in .au - that generally means Australian consumer law applies, rather than your consumer law. Under Australian consumer law, vendors have the right to force a settlement by refund rather than continue to cede to unreasonable demands to repair or replace a product that is not suited to purpose.

In all likelihood, I don't see this going any further. So far the response seems to be at least 70:30 in favour of Dillenger, so you're probably giving them more positive PR than the small amount of buyers you're scaring off. Really, you've been Streisand effected yourself.

You are right, I did use the wrong word. the right word is compensated. I expect is to be compensated for my time and effort as well as for the distress caused by dillenger. So yes, it would be recompense. I wouldn't ask for an unreasonable amount, just enough to cover my legal expenses, my own personal time and effort, as well as punitive damages for the distress they brought me under by refusing my warranty. I'll ask my lawyer if there are any grounds to a counter suit for false advertising as well as breach of contract.


All I have to show is that I am complying with the court order by obeying it myself, I am not required to stop others from breaking the court order. The gag order would only apply to me and asking as I don't speak about the court case to anyone I would be following the letter of the law. I cannot be convicted of not breaking a law, this is why these loopholes are completely legal. Well known corporations like Google and Apple employ these tactics (which are well known) to get around gag orders, and so far nobody has ever been held in contempt of court for it. For a gag order to be effective it has to be used swiftly and on someone that's either not expecting it or not planning for it. this is as far as I understand the law from the research that I have done. But I am not a lawyer, so we'll just have to see what happens :)

Google the word "Warrant Canary" to see what I'm talking about :)

Also, you don't seem to understand... I am not demanding anything of Dillenger. I am no longer demanding to have my rack replaced or repaired, that ship has passed before I even decided to start this post... Dillenger does not have a right to force a refund against my will. I am making no demands. I put my website up so that Dillenger can, of their own volition, realize that they should not treat their customers like they treated me because there are consequences for it. That they should revisit the design or manufacture of their products instead of ignoring the consumer. To not send cheap Chinese crap while claiming the best parts in the business. To not put 3 welds the size of my thumbnail on a part designed to hold a 10 pound battery, to deliver on their Warranty promises and any other promise they make to the customer.

Anyways, as I understand consumer law... Australian consumer law does not apply in this case even though the company is Australian. The consumer law that applies is that of the country that the Sale took place in, not the consumer law of the Company origin (that would be ridiculous), so Dillenger has no leg to stand on even if Australian consumer law says they can resolve by offering a refund.

But if we want to talk about Australian laws.... what about Australian laws against false advertising? Do those exist? If so then Dillenger would be breaking that law by promising a 12 month unlimited warranty on all parts then refusing to repair under warranty.
 
tomjasz said:
blackjackel said:
tomjasz said:
Ten minutes on Google and I'd have found a different vendor. Looks to me like folks got the service they earned.

Are you saying I changed your opinion on purchasing from Dillenger? I thought it might take a while for the website to take off, but to hear that it's already having an effect is wonderful to hear.
More food for the troll. No I would have discovered that it's a nice kit for a beginner without much creativity or dream. I out grew that sort of kit in the first month of reading about which direction I would take. If I wanted a kit for a kid I would have considered it. However there's far more exciting and fun bits and pieces out there for someone who wants to grow into the hobby or a better ride. Their business model and kits don't excite me. I'd suggest anyone who wants a very basic setup with no interest in the hobby to consider their kits. A good alternative to the funky little kit sellers who really are a potential problem. From my view they've done far more than I would have done. By a LONG shot. I hope as my little parts business grows, I learn to sniff out the kind of PIA customer you've proved to be, and not sell them a loose screw. I actually had a modicum of sympathy until the BS about lawyers and $23 overdraft whine got vomited.

Again, my favorite forums would have nuked your BS on the second post. I think it's ridiculous that the good folks moderating here let you prattle on. All you've really managed to do is prove that there are incredibly petty people in retail sales. K?

By holding this opinion you must believe Dillenger to be in the right and for me to be in the wrong... Correct?

Do you not believe that Dillenger should have sent me a replacement to the rack after promising a "12 month unlimited warranty"?

Did you see the pictures of the rack? Do you believe those weld points to be sufficient enough to hold a 10 pound battery up through the normal vibrations of city roads?

I'm not trying to change your opinion, I'm just curious as to why you hold it.

I'm starting to suspect that many people here have not visited the site or seen any of the evidence I put up to show why the rack is insufficient and decide to label me a troll before even investigating what happened.
 
Australian consumer law states the product must be. "Fit for intended use" ... And if it's not , then the customer is entitled to either a replacement, or refund.
But, get real, it's a cheap Chinese made bike rack, not an expensive hand made suit, !....what do you expect ?
A little thought and reading would have forewarned you this would not last, so part of the fault is yours for even buying it.!
Eventually you will have to get over this, for your sake, do it sooner rather than later
 
Blackjackel, I understand your anger. You need to move on. Think of it as a learning experience. (Geez that's what my teachers used to tell me) I've spent a ton of money on learning experience. Eventually you'll have the ebike you want. You'll will have learned how to put together every nut and bolt of the bike.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top